Masthead Menu

  • About this site
  • Contact Me
  • Archives
  • Mastheads
  • Shop
  • FAQ
  • community
  • view
  • view
  • view
dooce® - dooce.com

A word or two about vaccinations

A few weeks ago I taped some footage for a Momversation about vaccinations, and yesterday it went live:

Here I willingly admit to not understanding parents who choose not to vaccinate their children, an opinion that is now as controversial as refusing vaccinations used to be, and I will admit that this is a bit of a misleading and unfair statement, something I will further explain in a minute.

Thing is, I didn't always feel this way. In fact, my opinion about the choice to vaccinate your child used to look much like my opinion about most other parenting decisions (breastfeeding, co-sleeping, homeschooling, etc) in that I think you have to figure out what works best for you and your children and ignore all the people who are screaming at you that you're doing it wrong.

But let me back up a second... when Leta was born five years ago I had very few friends who were mothers and wasn't participating in any sort of parenting communities online. All of the mothers I did know had vaccinated their children with no lasting side-effects, and my pediatrician, a man who had vaccinated all eight of his children, talked me through what it all meant and assured me it was in Leta's best interest to have her vaccinated. I had heard stories about certain parents refusing vaccinations, but at the time their concerns were not about autism or side-effects but about fears of a government conspiracy, something I did not take seriously.

Things have dramatically changed in the last five years, and there is now so much more information available to parents about vaccinations, information and warnings and horror stories. And in these years I have listened to many women talk convincingly about how their children developed symptoms of autism in close proximity to the time they were administered certain vaccinations. And then there were the women whose children suffered terrible fevers and rashes and sometimes seizures. This naturally raised some questions for me, and for a time I could totally see why someone would choose not to vaccinate her chid.

I can still identify with these concerns.

However, the issue totally changed for me when news broke last year of a measles outbreak in Southern California that occurred because a seven-year-old boy who had not been vaccinated brought the disease back to the states from Switzerland:

The boy's measles immunoglobulin M (IgM) positive laboratory test result was reported to the county health department on February 1, 2008. During January 31--February 19, a total of 11 additional measles cases in unvaccinated infants and children aged 10 months--9 years were identified. These 11 cases included both of the index patient's siblings, five children in his school, and four additional children who had been in the pediatrician's office on January 25 at the same time as the index patient. Among these latter four patients, three were infants aged <12 months. One of the three infants was hospitalized for 2 days for dehydration; another infant traveled by airplane to Hawaii on February 9 while infectious...

... Overall, approximately 70 children exposed to children with measles in the school, a day care center, the pediatrician's office, and other community settings were placed under voluntary home quarantine because their parents either declined measles vaccination or they were too young to be vaccinated.

And I put myself in the position of the mother of that ten-month-old baby who caught the disease because they happened to be at the doctor's office at the same time as the infected boy. A ten-month-old baby whose immune system is such that there is a possibility of death. And I realized, I do not think that I would ever be able to forgive the parents of that infected boy. That is my raw, honest emotion toward that scenario.

That our children do not have to fear death from diseases like measles or polio or whooping cough is a miracle made possible by modern technology and science. And I guess the crux of this really complex problem for me is that as the number of parents who choose not to vaccinate their children increases so does the likelihood that these diseases will become a problem again. If you've decided that the risks are too great to vaccinate your child then you are counting on the rest of us who are willing to take those risks to decrease the chances that your child will be exposed to these diseases. You are counting on us. Maybe what I don't understand (in reference to my statement in the video) is the act of and willingness to give up that control. The choice to refuse vaccinations just seems to me to be a first world luxury.

In some of the footage that got cut from the final video I talk about how the standard vaccination schedule can seem very aggressive, and I totally understand and support families who want to work with their doctors to modify that schedule (you can read one mother's level-headed and articulate experience with that here). And I know of and support mothers who have had to change pediatricians who were unwilling to take their concerns about the schedule seriously. I understand that some children are allergic to certain ingredients in some vaccinations and this prevents them from receiving them. Which is why I think it's crucial to maintain what I've heard referred to as herd immunity so that those who really have no choice, who cannot receive vaccinations, are protected by those of us who can.

Perhaps by phrasing my opinion as, "I don't understand parents who don't vaccinate their children," I am misrepresenting my stance, and I will blame that on the fact that I had to film footage in the five minutes I could wedge into a packed SXSW schedule on a Monday afternoon a few weeks ago. Because what I'm really feeling is an unease, one that is directly proportional to the unease that causes certain parents to refuse vaccinations, an unease at what might logically happen if more and more parents refuse vaccinations, even if that refusal is well researched.

I know many of you disagree with me and that I risk some of you feeling alienated by even bringing up this topic. And I'd love to hear from you because I don't think that any of the unease on either side can be addressed or alleviated until we start communicating with each other in a tone that suggests we really want the same thing: health and safety for all of our children.

04.07.2009 Daily 1180 comments
Previous Post Next Post
  • 301. Erin said:

    Thank you, Heather. Thank you for using the power you have here, and in such an eloquent, well-spoken way. I don't say this lightly - You are my hero. Best wishes to you and your family :-)

    BTW, with a M.S. in Microbiology and working on a Clinical Lab Technology degree, I couldn't agree with you more.

    Erin

    04.07.09 - 08:02 PM
  • 302. Molly said:

    Heather, I'd go even farther than you did and say that I really think that it is reckless not to vaccinate your child. I absolutely agree that it should be a requirement for entry into schools for children (when I was a kid it still was), which is as close as we can get to making it legally compulsory. My cousins don't vaccinate your children. And like you said, the thing about this choice--unlike circumcision, unlike breast feeding--is that it poses an active threat to others. It exposes children--including these parents' own children--to grave harm. I really support having discussions about this that are *not* the usual whatever-floats-your-boat; I think we need to actively campaign to keep this recklessness from expanding and scaring wary mothers into making dangerous decisions.

    I also think that this movement comes out of a real head-in-the-sand contempt for science, and the truth is that no one has ever found that vaccinations do more harm than good. Far, far, to the contrary.

    04.07.09 - 08:03 PM
  • 303. Sarah @ BecomingSarah.com said:

    My husband and I have chosen to delay the vaccination schedule for our children.

    At first, it didn't go over well with the family, but hear me out. I want all of our children to have all of their recommended vaccinations. I have known people who survived polio and whooping cough, and those diseases are devastating. It's a miracle that they survived, a MIRACLE, and I would rather run a very minute risk of my child having a negative reaction than run the risk of my child dying or causing the death of another child. MAYBE by getting the vaccinations, I open my children to the possibility of death, but the likelihood of death is SO MUCH GREATER if they catch the disease naturally. I can understand not wanting to vaccinate your children for one or two vaccines if you KNOW beyond a shadow of a doubt that the vaccines caused a severe negative reaction in one of your kids and I can understand delaying the schedule to spread out side effects or skipping something that has an allergic reaction tagged to it, but after that, it's just too great a risk for me.

    The ONLY reason that we decided we will delay the vaccination schedule at all is because I have an auto-immune disorder. There is a very small chance that I will pass that on to my children, and an even smaller chance that it would manifest itself in them before they were teenagers, HOWEVER I would rather not tempt fate as complications from any chronic auto-immune disorder can and sometimes will kill. So we decided we'll delay the vaccination schedule for a couple weeks, something that the pediatric gastroenterologist worked out with us and the pediatrician we selected.

    This is an excellent topic and I hope you don't get too much hate mail for it. It's a difficult subject to broach, but I think it's very important for all parents to understand that just because we may differ in our opinions or our circumstances, it does not mean that we differ in what matters most to all of us. And what matters most to all of us is the security and the health of our children and the children of others.

    04.07.09 - 08:06 PM
  • 304. Gail said:

    Hi Heather!

    I just had to say my opinion on the whole vaccination debate really shifted a lot after learning about that same outbreak.

    I don't have kids yet, but will immunize when I do.

    If you don't listen to This American Life, well, I think you'd love it. But the fantabulous episode where this very story was covered (and from which I changed my opinion) was Episode #370: Ruining it for the Rest of us (12/22/08). Give it a listen!

    04.07.09 - 08:07 PM
  • 305. Ninabi said:

    My children are in their twenties now.
    But before my firstborn went to college, I urged one last shot.

    I didn't want her to die from meningitis in a dorm room three states away.

    I always made sure the kids were protected- no matter how old they were.

    04.07.09 - 08:08 PM
  • 306. frank-b said:

    Great post, thanks.

    I'm not really so fond of alternative vaccine schedules a la "The Vaccine Book." The CDC immunization schedule is put together by a consensus of world-class immunologists, virologists/bacteriologists, and various other -ists. "The Vaccine Book" is just written by one guy whose dad is famous.

    Actually all of the current childhood vaccines put together have fewer antigens than one dose of smallpox vaccine did, back before there was such a thing as a childhood immunization schedule. There are more vaccines but each one is more purified and targeted to create an immune response without provoking a big systemic reaction.

    04.07.09 - 08:09 PM
  • 307. Beth said:

    Thank you for being so measured and articulate. I cannot be. My partner is immunosuppressed. Every unimmunized child sitting in the pediatrician's office could kill her. I have sympathy for parents who were initially bamboozled by a study proven over and over again to have been bad science. But I have no sympathy for those who continue to ignore the hard evidence and put their own children and other children at such risk out of narcissistic paranoia. Those same parents are often driving SUVs and buying baby gadgets from factories that spew out the environmental poisons that will, I am quite sure, be proven the cause of accelerating rates of autism. Not immunizing your kid is like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

    04.07.09 - 08:10 PM
  • 308. wumples said:

    My mother chose not to have my siblings and I vaccinated when we were growing up, and none of us have ever suffered any illness or disease because of it (so far). Her concern was mostly over the contents of the vaccinations, their containing formaldehyde and various animal fetuses (and so forth). You've raised a great point about a herd immunity, that it does eliminate most of the chance that those of us who have not been immunized will catch something nasty.

    However, I think that immunizations should be used in instances of necessity, rather than instances of needless prevention. One child in the country caught measles - in Sweden - and brought the disease home. The child would not have infected others or have gotten ill himself had he been vaccinated before leaving the country, before entering a foreign region with different ideas and rules about how THEY operate vaccinations. As a rule I think that children (and adults, for that matter) should be vaccinated before entering any kind of area that their immune systems are not accustomed to, out of the country travel being the real example. If the diseases are eliminated at home (as they have been with generations of standardized, nearly mandatory vaccinations), and precautions are taken against world travelers bringing foreign illnesses home, there wouldn't be a need for mass immunization.

    04.07.09 - 08:11 PM
  • 309. PinkPoppies said:

    Dooce said "...as the number of parents who choose not to vaccinate their children increases so does the likelihood that these diseases will become a problem again. If you've decided that the risks are too great to vaccinate your child then you are counting on the rest of us who are willing to take those risks to decrease the chances that your child will be exposed to these diseases. You are counting on us."

    Thank you for summarizing how I feel about those who choose not to vaccinate. Herd immunity is more important than most people realize, and it frustrates me that many people in the first world decry vaccination while thousands upon thousands of children in third world countries could have a better chance at life if vaccines were more readily available.

    These are not benign diseases. And really, I don't mind people riding my and my children's coat-tails vis a vis vaccination, but at least be honest about the fact we are carrying the risk (and I don't deny one exists), and you are not, thanks to me and others who do. You meaning those who don't vaccinate. Thanks for writing about this so clearly.
    Pink

    04.07.09 - 08:11 PM
  • 310. Amber said:

    Thank you for posting about this.
    I live in San Diego (where the outbreak occurred), and luckily my daughter wasn't yet born during that time. Because my daughter has cancer, and because of her chemotherapy treatments we've had to delay immunizations. When her immune system was severely compromised due to the chemotherapy, I often thought about parents that don't vaccinate and the possible results of that if my daughter came into contact with one of their children, who happened to be carrying some disease. Luckily nothing like that happened, and I'm counting the months until she can receive her first vaccinations. You are right in that it's not just a personal, or family decision not to vaccinate, it affects the entire community, especially children that are too young for vaccines, or haven't received them due to medical issues.

    04.07.09 - 08:12 PM
  • 311. Elle said:

    I totally agree with your post. It wasn't that long ago that losing a child to a disease was very common. We are so fortunate to have the means to prevent these illnesses in our own children. Our youngest has a severe egg allergy so we're holding off on his Measles booster shot for now. It does concern me that he'll be exposed to it by someone who isn't vaccinated.

    04.07.09 - 08:12 PM
  • 312. Sarah said:

    I don't understand why people would choose not to vaccinate. We can eradicate some of these diseases if everyone vaccinated. If your child is allergic I understand but if not. WHY NOT?

    04.07.09 - 08:13 PM
  • 313. Anonymous said:

    Societies thrive when the "greater good" is considered in individual decision making. We are in a very selfish, hedonistic human phase which is reflected in this issue.

    Disease will return to us all, thanks to the selfish act of a few who believe the lives of their individual children are more important than the survival of the species.

    04.07.09 - 08:17 PM
  • 314. Chris said:

    I homeschool, breastfed and co-sleep. I also have all of my children vaccinated. I have friends who have chosen to not vaccinate. I kept my kid away from thier kids until my kids were fully vaccinated. I just couldn't take the chance. I live in S. CA, we have lots of immigrants, illegal ones that did not have to prove that they did not bring disease into our Country and to my kids. My choice, I will not argue it or debate it.

    04.07.09 - 08:18 PM
  • 315. Louise said:

    I am the mother of 4 and have had all mine vaccinated. The only problem I have with it is how much they try to do at one time. They always try to give my children 4 to 6 different ones and I always have to explaine that I will only allow 2 at a time. Once they get over the "shock" they just pick the ones they think can't wait 4 to 6 weeks. My worry is that there are so many they are shoving at you that if your child get sick or has a reaction then you don't know which one caused it.

    04.07.09 - 08:22 PM
  • 316. Audrey said:

    Vaccines don't simply cut down on diseases--they also cut down on fear. Back when polio swept through every couple of years, can you imagine how terrified the mothers were? How horrible it would be as a child to lose friends, classmates, relatives, siblings, or see them crippled? That's only one disease, too.

    I feel lucky that I don't live in a time where one in five children died before puberty. All my friends from childhood are still alive. One or two kids (that I didn't know) died in high school, but not from diseases. All my cousins, aunts, and uncles are alive and healthy. None of the kids in my elementary schools died while I was there. The reduction in child mortality isn't only the result of vaccinations (better child care, better water/nutrition/hygiene, better health care in general, and other things all factor in), but it does help, especially in a world where measles is still one of the top five causes of child deaths.

    Gardisal/HPV and chicken pox vaccines I can understand holding back on. Chicken pox is usually very treatable and the vaccine has only been around in the States for less than fifteen years. The effects of Gardasil/HPV vaccines haven't been tested beyond five or six years, so they're still new, too (I've studied Gardasil). Even the flu, because it is easy to treat and often not serious, I can understand not getting.

    I do think more research on the effects of vaccines could be done (even if the autism/MMR link is refuted, certainly there are other potential links to diseases that could be examined), and I fully support modifying the vaccination schedule to be less aggressive. I also support parents researching the vaccines and modifying which vaccines their children get (as I said, not getting chicken pox/flu vaccines may be fine; I don't know the risks vs. benefits of all vaccines). That said, parents who don't vaccinate should consider not only with whether it's the right choice for their children, but whether they'd be able to bear risking the children of their friends and neighbors. A lot of diseases are contagious before symptoms show up. That doesn't mean the potential illness/death of a neighbor's child would be their fault, but it could still ruin their friendship or leave them feeling guilty.

    Personally, I'm glad that the ones of us who are immunized can 'protect' the ones who are allergic.

    04.07.09 - 08:25 PM
  • 317. Allison said:

    I wish I had more time to sit on this blog and read the comments...I am sure I would be both enlightened and frustrated. As a mom of three (the last one is three months and was born with a congenital heart defect), I am a huge advocate of respecting science and its practitioners. I feel that there has been a huge movement in North America of distrusting the experts (with the proliferation of the Internet, everyone can start performing their own diagnosis) be it in the field of medicine, law or politics. Yes, there are horror stories (hell, my kid was one of the 3 out of 100 who got the chicken pox vaccination and then got full-blown chicken pox), but these people are trained professionals. Can we put a little more enlightened trust back into these people who have trained and practiced their profession for any number of years? Thanks for the post...hope it doesn't scare you off from more of the same (although, given that you are the "Heather Armstrong", how could it?).

    04.07.09 - 08:26 PM
  • 318. Allison said:

    I wish I had more time to sit on this blog and read the comments...I am sure I would be both enlightened and frustrated. As a mom of three (the last one is three months and was born with a congenital heart defect), I am a huge advocate of respecting science and its practitioners. I feel that there has been a huge movement in North America of distrusting the experts (with the proliferation of the Internet, everyone can start performing their own diagnosis) be it in the field of medicine, law or politics. Yes, there are horror stories (hell, my kid was one of the 3 out of 100 who got the chicken pox vaccination and then got full-blown chicken pox), but these people are trained professionals. Can we put a little more enlightened trust back into these people who have trained and practiced their profession for any number of years? Thanks for the post...hope it doesn't scare you off from more of the same (although, given that you are the "Heather Armstrong", how could it?).

    04.07.09 - 08:26 PM
  • 319. Anonymous said:

    There is NO link between autism and vaccinations. If you take the time to find the information and understand the claims and the actual proposed mechanisms - there just isn't any science to back up the claim that there is a link. I am a parent. I understand the fear. I feel for people who believe what they do. But the truth, the cold hard, science - it rests squarely with the fact that there is no link. Further, parents who don't vaccinate put their children and the rest of us at risk. It's irresponsible.

    04.07.09 - 08:26 PM
  • 320. Ella said:

    I didn't read the entirety of these comments, but I'm sure they're full of people with their own stories and opinions.

    All I know is that my little nephew came into contact with an unvaccinated child when he was 2 months old, contracted whooping cough, and almost died. They had the priest in there two nights in a row, giving last rights and comfort to my inconsolable sister.

    None of my family can forgive that child's parents. My nephew has had lung problems ever since. It was a horrifying traumatic experience, and my nephew wasn't the only victim.

    04.07.09 - 08:29 PM
  • 321. Rochelle said:

    I have two children and both are immunized. When my son was born the Autism issue became more of a topic of discussion. I was afraid to have my son immunized and I worried for weeks after every round, but just like #314 Chris, I live in CA, where we have many illegal immigrants who do not have to prove that they are not bringing diseases into our country and to my children. I had to weigh the risks. I felt that there was a greater chance of my son contracting a potentially deadly disease from an unvaccinated person than him developing autism from being vaccinated. Both children are fine.

    04.07.09 - 08:34 PM
  • 322. Jordan Rosenfeld said:

    I totally understand where Heather is coming from--we chose to start our vaccinations later, at 6 mos rather than 2, since a baby's immune system is so unformed at 2 months and they want to pump so many vax in at once. Our pediatrician was fine with that. We did miss a few as a result--rotavirus (stomach flu), big whoop, and we are choosing not to do chicken pox, but other than that, some parents don't even realize that starting late and spreading them out is an option!

    04.07.09 - 08:34 PM
  • 323. Robin said:

    I may only be an 18 year old high school senior with no children and no plans to have any ever, I have to say this post was really great to read for me.

    When I was 8, I had a heart transplant and thus, I have been immunosuppressed for roughly 9 years. In short, if you get a cold for a week, I'll get it for two or three.

    My family and I are constantly on high-alert about any illnesses or bacteria or anything nasty going around so that we can be prepared to deal with it if it gets to me.

    I'm going to college this fall and I'm forever grateful that many colleges force you to get vaccinated for meningitis and many other nasty illnesses. If I were to get anything like that, I would die very, very quickly.

    It's unfair to decide that you just can't risk your perfectly healthy child getting sick to protect the lives of other people. Your child gets very ill, an immune-compromised child that is in contact with them might very well die. How would that feel?

    Dooce, you presented both sides of the argument very well and I am constantly impressed with your fairness and your willingness to breach those tough topics that other people won't. Keep it coming!

    04.07.09 - 08:35 PM
  • 324. Sarah V. said:

    Public health is a community effort, and vaccines are very much a part of that effort. I can't imagine hearing my child is autistic and thinking it was in some way my fault. That I hadn't protected him. But we are part of a much larger picture, and we cannot ignore our responsibilities to the community at large. I agree with you wholeheartedly.

    04.07.09 - 08:37 PM
  • 325. Christine said:

    After 2 years of evaluations and appointments, we're expecting to finally have a diagnosis of autism in our son, now 4.

    The signs became obvious after 12 months (and the MMR) when he experienced a severe regression in language.

    When he was 2 1/2, we had our second child. We now know our son exhibited signs of autism since birth. We just didn't recognize it; they were subtle. My son is a really weird 4 year old, but he's a great kid. This is just who he is.

    Since other people brought up pets...I'm a vet. We overvaccinate animals. Seriously.

    04.07.09 - 08:38 PM
  • 326. Anonymous said:

    So many people who have gone along with their doctors' schedules for immunizations are telling those who didn't to do more research. I think those folks might want to do some reading as well. As parents, it's our job to think for ourselves and decide what is best for our individual, unique children, not to blindly accept a one-size-fits-all plan that was partially created by people who get richer and richer each time a new vaccine is added to the mandatory schedule. Our babies are babies. We need to be their advocates. The CDC and the FDA aren't going to do it for us.

    04.07.09 - 08:39 PM
  • 327. Anna said:

    I'm delurking!
    Heather, thank you for your honest and thoughtful opinion on this topic. I agree with you 100%.
    I am a nursing student, and last year I saw something which firmly swayed me onto the 'pro-vaccination' side: The most beautiful 18-month old baby girl in the pediatric ICU with viral meningitis, which is preventable by vaccine. To this day I do not know if she made it but if she did, she will have terrible and irreversible brain damage and pain lasting the rest of her life.

    Absolutely, the vaccination schedule is heavy and possibly fuelled by cost-efficiency rather than the wellbeing of children (In British Columbia, where I live, Hepatitis B is being added to the infant vaccination schedule, though it was never given until sixth grade before). And I would never tell a mother whose child developed symptoms of autism soon after vaccinations that this is merely a coincidence, a matter of timing, because nobody knows for sure.

    But I have seen the alternative and the pain it causes families, and I would never wish that upon anyone.

    04.07.09 - 08:40 PM
  • 328. Rosemary said:

    I am at a crossroads with my son's vaccinations. When my son was 2 he was diagnosed with PDD-NOS (an autism spectrum disorder). At the time I didn't want to believe anything that wasn't verified by doctors, i.e. that a vaccination could cause my son's disorder. Since that time so much has changed.

    I understand your thoughts and concerns completely. I too want to protect my child and other children from disease, but I truly feel that these vaccinations are poisoning our children. Until you have an autistic child of your own, you can never know how devastating and crippling it is to not understand anything about your child. The thing that keeps parent's like me from vaccinations is the drowning fear of regression. It is a daily fear in an autistic parents mind, that for no reason, you child is going to lose a part of them that you have worked months or years to help them achieve. I have seen it happen first hand.

    My son is up for vaccinations again before the start of school, and I don't know what I will do. I want so badly to not have to think about these decisions. I want to trust my son's doctors, I want to trust the scientists who make the vaccinations, I want to trust the world to care about my struggle. The truth is that the same person who would call me out for not vaccinating my son, is the same person who will say in the grocery store "You need to learn to control your child", the same person who looks over from an opposite table in a restaurant and is disgusted with my child's behavior, the same people who will make fun of someone with disabilities, and who will do everything they can to make life for us harder.

    I wish I lived in a world where people could understand my autistic son, where they would help to accommodate everyone. The truth is that we don't. It's every man for himself, and will always be that way. When I make the decision about my sons vaccinations it will be the decision best for my son, for his life.

    Heather, I have been reading your website and other work for years now. I was reading before my son was diagnoses, before he lost his speech, before he changed into someone I didn't know. I used to compare his development with Leta's from the things you wrote about her in the corresponding newsletters. I even tried to tell myself that my child wasn't autistic because Leta was difficult at times, and did strange things, and she is such a brilliant beautiful child. I respect your opinion on the matter, and think it's a smart one, but only hope that I shed some light on what it is like for me.

    04.07.09 - 08:40 PM
  • 329. Michelle A. said:

    This brought up something that I've been wondering about for a while. When I was pregnant (1986, my son is 22 now) I had heard the arguments about not vaccinating, but I worried more what might happen if I didn’t have him vaccinated than what could happen if he had the vaccinations, (my younger brother and I had the whooping cough he was 5, I was 10 from what my mother said it was pretty bad). What I did worry was the use of ultrasound. It was fairly new and since I had no health issue that required one, I chose not to have any ultrasounds. I wouldn't even let the doctor use the fetal heart monitor, except once so my husband could hear the heart beat, but after that I only allowed him the use of his stethoscope.

    I’m sure no one wants to hear this (and I even hesitate to post this comment), but with the rise of Autism, I’ve been wondering if there could be a relationship between the use of ultrasounds and Autism. After I read your post I did a google search “correlation of sonograms for pregnancy and autism” and there were quite a few articles.

    It's just a thought and I certainly hope I’m wrong. But if it is possible - saying no to an ultrasound is less risky than saying no to vaccinations.

    04.07.09 - 08:41 PM
  • 330. Jen B said:

    Just another personal experience: I'm a 35 year old mother of a 4 year old and a 2 year old, both vaccinated. I'm also a cancer patient, and I'm having a bone marrow transplant this summer that will leave me immunologically the same as an unvaccinated newborn. In my extended circle of moms, the vaccination issue doesn't come up often; it is considered personal, and a little taboo, and as illustrated here, people are really wedded to whichever side they are on. So while I know of two unvaccinated kids that my children play with, there may well be many more.

    So here I sit, trying hard to keep life as normal as possible for my kids while I undergo treatment, and that means lots of playdates, preschool, camps, play groups. And while I am not super concerned about the statistical blip that would have my immunized kids bringing these diseases home to me, I am very concerned about direct exposure. Because even though all of these moms know I have cancer, it is my impression that, having made the non-vacc decision, they just don't really consider the implications on a day to day basis. They aren't keeping their kids away for newborns for sure, and I don't think they'd even realize the risk to me if I didn't point it out.

    Which I will, of course, because my life is worth an uncomfortable conversation or two, but man, it would be nice if all of those who could be immunized, where.

    04.07.09 - 08:42 PM
  • 331. Jessica said:

    I completely agree on this one. I'm sure a lot have said it in above comments, however, I'm messing around a little before doing homework and didn't really have time to read each and every one of the 312 comments. I am a mother of 2 under 2 years old right now. I have always and will continue to vaccinate them right on schedule. My family physician has been my doctor since I was 4 years old, delivered my brother and both of my kids, and will continue to be my children's doctor until he retires. If he truly thought that the risks of giving my children the vaccine outweighed the need for them, I'm sure he would let me know and we wouldn't be giving them to my children. He just has the best interests of them at heart. Like someone else said at the beginning, yes, if my child showed signs of autism because I immunized them, I would be crushed. But what if they ended up getting polio because of me not immunizing them?

    04.07.09 - 08:43 PM
  • 332. Katherine said:

    It's not like you don't have enough comments. But thanks for writing about this. Parents who will not vaccinate are a constant frustration for me. And most of the refuse on purely random reasons.

    Many people are afraid to vaccinate infants and decide to hold off immunizations until their children are older. But the diseases are most dangerous the younger the children are. I have taken care of children with devastating disease that could have been prevented by a simple shot.

    04.07.09 - 08:44 PM
  • 333. Brat said:

    Heather said: "Which is why I think it's crucial to maintain what I've heard referred to as herd immunity so that those who really have no choice, who cannot receive vaccinations, are protected by those of us who can."

    Yes!

    Heather said: "The choice to refuse vaccinations just seems to me to be a first world luxury."

    Yes, again.

    Excellent post, Heather.

    04.07.09 - 08:44 PM
  • 334. Mandy said:

    I totally agree that the spread of disease is about 10 years away if parents continue to stop vaccinating their kids. I don't feel at all like I will be "herding" my kid into getting her shots(I'm due in 5 weeks). Rather, I feel the exact same way as you. Thanks for wording my opinion in a great way!

    04.07.09 - 08:48 PM
  • 335. Vicki said:

    I COMPLETELY agree with Sharon (#234). My daughter is 12 and considered severely autistic. Back in 1996 when she was born, 1998 when we were suspicious that something just wasn't quite right, autism awareness wasn't nearly where it is today. Because we lived in remote Alaska, her immunizations were even crazier and more aggressive than they were for children in the continental U.S. or larger cities. Poor kid, it's no wonder that this bewildering condition, which I too believe to be an auto-immune condition, was triggered. We will always wonder how she might have been if not for this thing called autism and if the medical community had not been so gung-ho and pressuring to immunize in an "efficient" manner. If I ever had another child, yes, I would immunize, but at a pace that I would dictate and if the pediatrician balked, then he or she would be fired and we'd move on to the next. I'm sick of doctors who play God and think that no one dare question them let alone seriously listen and consider a parent's opinion ( or experience).

    Some people might lump me with the consipiracy theorists, but my concern with that is that time and time again, greed has trumped the public welfare--if not with vaccines ( and yes, maybe with vaccines--trying to make ALL children get vaccinated if they want to attend public school puts a lot of money in SOMEBODY'S pocket), then that greed has been revealed with other prescription drugs that have been pulled from the market for killing a small number of people.

    But as I said, if I was ever faced with this decision again, I would vaccinate. I'd just feel uneasy and VERY watchful.

    04.07.09 - 08:48 PM
  • 336. emily said:

    live with my parents for one day. live with them and the life they lead as the parents of a 25 year old child with autism. because that is what he is. a child. he will never move on, he will never have his own life. never fit in anywhere, never cease to threaten bodily harm to my parents on a daily basis. he will never grow up and my parents are trapped. stuck.

    try being the sibling of this child, one of the three siblings who were ignored their whole lives. not because parents didn't try, but because it is impossible to deal with that and be a parent at the same time.

    you can excuse all the reason i've given so far, but can you excuse this:

    my brother knows he has autism. he knows he isn't normal, he comprehends that, he knows it won't be fixed. forever trapped. he knows what is going on.

    deal with that for 25 years and then tell me which you'd rather have. a child with any ANY life-threatening disease with a VERY HIGH survival rate or a child with autism.

    if you grew up in my house you wouldn't take the chance. sadly even if it meant threatening the lives of children around you.

    04.07.09 - 08:50 PM
  • 337. Heidi said:

    I'm a public health major soon to graduate, and I actually just wrote a paper on the Switzerland measles outbreak. I have to say, I am big on herd immunity. Being immunodeficient also, I have to say, vaccines are probably the best things out there. I have a friend, incidentally, who is doing research on autism and how it is acquired (vaccines, heredity, etc), and so far they've only found that some sort of illness in pregnancy has caused it, in addition to hereditary factors. While mice are not people, it does present an interesting case.

    Anyway, when I have kids, they are getting those shots. If they're immunodeficient as well, I can't risk wasting time.

    04.07.09 - 08:51 PM
  • 338. Jana said:

    My son contracted whooping cough (pertussis) at 5 weeks old and almost died as a result.

    So someone else chose not to have their vaccinations and infected my newborn, me (my immunity was low as a result of the pregnancy), and my Dad who was on chemo at the time.

    I can't help but shake my head at my friends who think it's somehow healthier for their kids to forego vaccinations.

    People, these disease _kill_ kids.

    04.07.09 - 08:52 PM
  • 339. Anonymous said:

    "I have two children, 18 and 16. Neither of them have been vaccinated. It was a personal choice after much research. My daughter had a few shots before we moved to India when she was an infant, as a precaution."

    Those shots for India WERE vaccinations and they were a precaution against possible diseases. I have to wonder (and I say this completely without sarcasm but rather with bewilderment) why one would vaccinate a child for life in another country but not for life in your own.

    I am an American adult currently living in China and it has never occurred to me to ask whether I was immunized as a child. That's definitely a conversation I need to have with my parents, just to be certain. I also need to discuss possible boosters with my doctor.

    I appreciate the need for every parent to make the decision that they feel is best, but I truly hope parents who decide not to vaccinate keep these conversations going as their children grow into adults. It is a global community and so many people travel and work abroad. My parents are still around to discuss this with but in a couple of decades today's children will be adults making decisions about their own health and it will be so important for them to know about their own immunity. If their parents aren't willing or able to answer questions, they won't be able to make well informed decisions about their own health care.

    04.07.09 - 08:55 PM
  • 340. Anonymous said:

    I wonder if people who DO vaccinate their children keep them away from people with a comprised immune system when they receive a live virus vaccine. Seeing as you can be contagious for a while after getting these kinds of vaccines, children who were recently vaccinated can just as much of a threat as the ones who weren't. If not more.

    I wonder how many people even know this or are told this by their doctor. I certainly never was.

    I think the important thing is being informed about what you are doing, whatever you do. There is no right way to do it.

    Also, blaming non-vaccinated people for infecting your vaccinated self makes very little sense. If you are up to date on your vaccinations then you should be protected or at least get a very VERY mild version of the disease. If you think the vaccines give you such bad protection, then why are you getting them in the first place?

    04.07.09 - 08:57 PM
  • 341. Michele said:

    Thank you Heather for posting this! I think it is a really important conversation to be having, and for Mom's to be speaking out in support of vaccination. I think there Mom's are often too polite on this topic and too scared to voice their opinion. and the small percentage that don't vaccinate get so much attention that it seems like they are the majority, when in fact it is the opposite. there is a lot of community risk to not vaccinating and we are seeing more and more diseases starting to come back. there is so much misinformation out there that can be hard to sort through, and stories of sick children are heartbreaking and parents believes in links to vaccines can be very moving. We all want to do what is best for our children, and having honest conversations and being willing to speak out will help us get there and help protect our communities.

    04.07.09 - 08:57 PM
  • 342. A. N. Davis said:

    one thing i'd like to bring up to those who feel the chicken pox vaccination is unnecessary: the chicken pox virus does not leave your system, and can resurface as shingles at any time. when you're 70 and hit with shingles, it's ten times worse than the chicken pox. there is pain involved, not just an irritating itch and a fever. as a matter of fact a friend of mine had shingles at 24, and she said it's an experience she would rather not repeat. the pain and discomfort was enough to shut her down for a week or two, and she has numerous scars from her encounter. unnecessary? i think not. if you want to protect your children from shingles when they're older, you have the power by choosing to get them vaccinated against the virus that causes chicken pox.
    that aside, well written post, i agree completely. i would move heaven and earth to protect my child from Things That Could Kill Her, and do not understand the thought process of those who think that autism is going to be more dangerous than polio, or rubella, or mumps.

    04.07.09 - 08:58 PM
  • 343. The niffer said:

    Great post, Heather. I'm a little suspect that someone else wrote this - you're abnormally articulate for eight months pregnant. I distinctly remember losing the ability to form sentences at that stage of pregnancy.

    04.07.09 - 08:59 PM
  • 344. Kelly said:

    This is a hot issue. I have vaccinated both of my children, and am in the process now with my 5 month old. I think its crucial to the health of us all. In Africa and other 3rd world countries, the diseases that we have vaccines for, they do not, so many people die from preventable diseases every day. I remember a lady trying to get me not to vaccinate. Ger argument was how much autism and other auto-immune diseases have risen in occurance in the last 100 years, increasing at least 3 fold. Upon researching census reports, the population of the US has increased more than 3 fold since 1900. Coincidence? I think not! Man, I hope this whole stigma about vaccines will diminish soon....

    04.07.09 - 09:01 PM
  • 345. Sheryl said:

    My first comment after reading the Dooce for a long time :) Forgive me if this subject was already touched on, as there are so many comments (though I did go through quite a few of them).

    Children whose parents refuse to immunize them may have a very hard time immigrating to other countries if they ever wish to do so, such as was my pretty obligatory decision when I, a Canadian, fell in love with an American - one of us had to immigrate in order to be together (I moved there/here). There is a pretty rigorous investigation of one's past to affirm health and social stability, including providing up-to-date and thorough immunization records. I don't know if an applicant would be rejected for refusing to become up to date - which if they agreed to do could be pretty traumatizing all at once, if you've resisted immunization which is set to an aggressive schedule even over the course of growing up - but from the immigration horror stories I've heard and read (and experienced), I would bet on it.

    So there's another unoft-considered variable I thought I would throw out there :) Overall, I agree with Heather, and appreciate as always her experienced and balanced and compassionate opinions.

    04.07.09 - 09:02 PM
  • 346. Anonymous said:

    @284

    Re: WHO and tetnus and HCG

    Please read:

    http://www.who.int/immunization_monitoring/milstien.pdf

    WHO's goal is to save the lives of newborns and you do that by immunizing women. The vaccine does not affect fertility.

    04.07.09 - 09:03 PM
  • 347. Kim said:

    I pre-empt this by saying that I am not a doctor. I studied pathogenic bacteriology in school but stopped at my bachelor's degree. I became extremely curious about this subject and have read and studied a lot and I firmly believe that the increase in autism has more to do with the older age of parents now and the increase in fertility issues/treatments and drugs more than any link to vaccines. It's just coincidence that they occur around the same time as most autism cases first manifest. That combined with better screening so that even the more minor autism cases are diagnosed when before they may not have been leads to the increase of cases.

    But like I said this is just my belief, not backed up by any scientific studies or anything of that sort.

    When I have children I will definitely vaccinate them, but most likely on a modified schedule to decrease chances of multiple vaccines causing reactions or amplifying side effects.

    04.07.09 - 09:03 PM
  • 348. Kate R said:

    Thank you so much for this post.

    My sister, who has two kids, and I have had countless conversations about this and we cannot understand why people think it is okay not to vaccinate. As Heather said, this is truly a modern miracle that we are not all dying of these diseases anymore. Measles kills kids. Mumps kills kids. Polio kills kids. I'm not sure what about that makes the decision to vaccinate difficult.

    If my five month old son got sick because some other parent had decided for whatever reason not to vaccinate my rage would have no bounds. Forgiveness would not be an option.

    04.07.09 - 09:04 PM
  • 349. Kylie ... said:

    Heather, thank you for having the courage to raise such a contentious issue.

    Measles is NOT just a harmless virus that runs it's course within 10 to 14 days.

    Secondary bacterial infection, measles pneumonia, acute and subacute measles encephalitis, subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE) and myocarditis are just a few complications of the measles virus. All can be fatal.

    Nine years ago I witnessed the slow and painful death of a child who had developed SSPE as a direct result of not being immunized. It was nothing short of harrowing.

    My heart still breaks for those parents. Their choice to refuse immunizing their daughter ultimately meant they had to bury her.

    04.07.09 - 09:04 PM
  • 350. Karen said:

    Heather, great post and I agree with you completely.

    As an adoptive parent to a young child born in India, who suffered paralysis from Polio, and now lives with those effects, I am reminded daily the reason why the US public wanted so dearly to eradicate the disease. Please know it is NOT eradicated world-wide and can come back, to each and every unvaccinated person. Vaccinations are not perfect but they reduce the risks and that's beneficial.

    04.07.09 - 09:04 PM
  • 351. Lisa said:

    As a pediatric RN I say Amen, and Amen again. That being said, the whole vaccination thing is a bit like religion and politics... there is no changing the mind of someone who is convinced of their stand and no good can come of trying. On a personal level of what happens without vaccines. When my daughter was 22 months old, she got terribly, terribly sick with rotavirus and spent 5 days in the hospital. Mostly this is not something kids in a country with access to IV fluids and the most basic of medical care die of... mostly. Kids do die of this in our country. It is not on the level of other more serious illnesses for which there are vaccines. When she was an infant there was no rotavirus vaccine. Now there is. Do I wish there had been? You betcha! Would have saved her and us much grief, misery and missed work. Not to mention the $3,000 out-of-pocket insurance deductible + several thousand more out of our insurance companies pocket. It is of course about much more than money but this does factor into the equation as well.

    04.07.09 - 09:05 PM
  • 352. diana said:

    so happy you clarified your thoughts beyond the momversation thing. thanks Heather.
    forgive me if this has already been said somewhere here. has anyone heard about Jenny McCarthy's autism organization? go to the fourteen studies she has on her site, http://fourteenstudies.org/
    & read what is there. It's important for people to know that there is a lot we need to change in order for our children to be vaccinated safely. I hope this awareness is what comes out of all this discussion.

    04.07.09 - 09:09 PM
  • 353. Suzanne M said:

    A.N. Davis @ 342:
    Unfortunately, the varicella vaccine doesn't protect against shingles. If you're vaccinated instead of exposed naturally, you can still develop shingles later on. Indeed, one of the criticisms of the varicella vaccine is that it may have contributed to an increase in the number of shingles patients. Some doctors believe that one of the things that prevented shingles in many people was repeated post-immunization exposure to chicken pox from infected children, and that now so few children get the disease that the natural boosting of the immunity has vanished. I'm not sure how well this is supported by evidence, though.

    There is, however, now a shingles vaccine. The CDC recommends it for people 60 and older. It's very new, and not the most effective vaccine out there, from what I understand, but it does cut down on both the incidence of the disease and the subsequent neuralgia (which, I gather, is excruciating).

    04.07.09 - 09:09 PM
  • 354. Sarah said:

    I agree with you. I have a 7 month old and I fear every time I think of the summer holidays when we will visit relatives who have kids between 5 years and 16 months. I wonder if those kids are vaccinated, if they go to places where other kids are sick. I believe in science and I was vaccinated when I was a kid,I have to say I never had any of the "typical childhood diseases". I dont want my son to be exposed to other kids at all if this trend becomes more popular in my community.
    I agree with the puppy/kid analogy too. We could get rid of so many diseases if we all work together. In my early school years I knew a girl with a polio sequel and I havent seen any more kids with polio sequels ( thank God!) because of an exhaustive campaign to get rid of this disease.
    :) Good video.

    04.07.09 - 09:13 PM
  • 355. Anu said:

    I find it troubling and hard to understand that many parents here chose not to vaccinate their children. I come from a third world country where vaccinations were and still are a luxury for 75% of the population. The lack of vaccinations also mean a very good chance of death. You are right that choosing to vaccinate or not sure is a first world luxury.

    04.07.09 - 09:16 PM
  • 356. Anonymous said:

    I completely agree with you 100% Heather. I briefly had a room-mate whose mother 'forgot' to immunize him. He went through so many diseases as a child and is stricken with polio.
    Also, people think that chicken pox affect the youngest the most and once you're grown up, you're out of harms way. My neighbor got the pox when he was 40 and it almost killed him.

    I honestly think that your immune system also depends on the environment you grow up in. My dad's a doctor so I got every shot under the sun, but I was raised in India and have yet to make a trip to the hospital for anything other than physical injuries.

    I'm not married nor have kids. But if I ever do decide to have kids, I will vaccinate them - no questions asked.

    04.07.09 - 09:18 PM
  • 357. Courtney said:

    My son, who is almost 4, was diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder at the age of 2. He was vaccinated. When something is wrong, people tend to get the crazies looking for answers. I don't blame the vaccinations. I felt like the choice that I made to have both of my kids vaccinated was the same as the choice that I make everyday by not letting them walk to school, on the interstate, in rush hour traffic. It's my job to protect them.
    What if vaccinations play a part in autism. What if they don't.
    What if grandma had balls, she'd be grandpa. Just sayin'.

    04.07.09 - 09:22 PM
  • 358. Jane said:

    I will keep this short and give my 2cents worth-

    I haven't immunized my kids. My daughter had chicken pox when she was a baby.
    Do I think there could be a correlation between vaccinations and autism? There could be. Would anyone (ie goverment or pharmaceutical companies) admit it? No! There would be lawsuits like you would not imagine. All those companies would go under and then there would be no companies making medicines for diseases that are currently around.

    If I was to immunize my children- it would be on a delayed schedule. There is no need for most babies to be immunized at such a young defenseless age with all those viruses. Vaccinations shouldnt be started so early- especially if the child is at home and not in a daycare setting. I think there needs to be more lobbying to have a delayed schedule.
    Why give 3 shots at once? One at a time. Spread out.

    And to the people who did give vaccinations- and whose children had no problem. Give thanks to God everyday.
    It's like smoking. Some people can smoke everyday of their life and never get cancer. Others smoke and get cancer and die.

    Personally I think that Autism is more of a "death" sentence than having chicken pox for a week or having measles for a month. Come on. YOu usually get better. We live in a first rate country with great doctors. They can control the disease if you do get it. Autism is not curable.

    04.07.09 - 09:22 PM
  • 359. SS said:

    I've read all 331 comments so far at the start of my writing, and I'm beyond thrilled at the thoughtful intelligence of your readers.

    As a pediatrician, I know a lot of other pediatricians, and I know people who work at the CDC and my state's health board. All of the people I know in these positions vaccinate their children, and it is because they are fully informed and can systematically assess the medical literature. Both you, Heather, and many of your prior commentators have well addressed why the concern about vaccines being related to autism is an unfounded one, so I won't keep reiterating that. But there is something I do want to address.

    Much as I appreciate non-vaccinating parents who study up on this on their own out of love and concern for their kids -- and I do, and I am glad that we are on the same side of wanting to do the very best for their children -- I have yet to meet anyone not trained in medicine, sociology, or epidemiology who can assess medical studies in a way that is comprehensive and scientific.

    I teach medical students, and let me tell you, most of *them* can't really assess medical studies well during the first two years of their training. This is why clinical rotations have "journal clubs," where the staff meet with those in training, watch them present studies and try to assess them, then step in and explain how to address what wasn't addressed by the student or resident. Which, frankly, is almost always a lot, especially in the first years of medical school.

    Reading online information for 100 hours, even if that includes reading the actual medical studies, isn't doing scientific medical research. Unless you know what to look for, how to use that information, and how to reassess to make sure you hit all the notes, it's just reading. Again, I am glad and impressed when non-professionally-trained parents do it, but -- and this is a big "but" -- when I gently ask them how they assessed the scientific literature, I have yet to hear an answer I would accept from even a first-year medical student (and again, most first-year medical students haven't a clue how to do this yet).

    When I ask what they look for in a good study design, how (and whether) to calculate an odds ratio, which populations the conclusions can be generalized to, how to compare control and intervention groups, what significance really means in all of its many uses as a term -- none of that most basic level of analysis is accurately answered, much less the full spectrum of approach for a thorough technical assessment.

    That's okay, and that doesn't mean the reading hasn't been a worthwhile use of time, and it sure doesn't mean the parents are not intelligent, caring, thoughtful, smart people. It just means they aren't trained to do this, and, more importantly, they don't know what they don't know. Furthermore, it takes me months to teach medical students who already have a background training and the medical vocabulary to do this right -- I can't teach even the smartest non-professional how to do this in an office visit! (Or two, or three, or ten visits. Not well enough to be reliable and scientifically thorough.)

    But here's the kicker: it's what we don't know that we don't know which makes us the most unreliable scientists and presents the most risk to our children. This is also what makes medical students, residents, and even a few licensed physicians unreliable and risky to patients: they don't know (yet) what they don't know, and so they have no idea that they need to know more, much less where to begin.

    However, in every parent I've had this conversation with, there has been love, and heartfelt concern, and smartness and brains and fierce protectiveness, and I've found that we really are on the same side with regards to what we want and care about. It's just that the expert on one side of the desk happens to be the expert in medicine, and the expert on the other side of the desk is the expert on that particular child. Just as I cannot be a good parent to that child, so that parent cannot be a good doctor to him or her. We can, however, work together and pool expertise.

    But I know that even after ten office visits, I'm never going to be an expert on your child -- not his needs, or her fears, or his idiosyncracities, or how to comfort her. My loss. And similarly, you will not be an expert in medicine. Thank goodness we have experts on both areas at the table, and thank goodness we both care so much about these kids.

    04.07.09 - 09:23 PM
  • 360. Lifeasthemotherof4 said:

    Wow. I use to feel the same way about vaccines as you do, until two of my normally developing children became autistic two weeks after routine vaccinations. One of them, mind you, I was told was not autistic one months before his shots by the same professional who told me my older son was on the Autistic spectrum.

    Now, unfortunately, I have done a tremendous amount of research on vaccines and I realize that I didn't know what ingredients were in the shots my children received. I didn't know how common side effects were. I didn't know who was on the boards that approved the shots and what financial ties they had to pharmaceutical companies. My sons' pediatricians did not ask the right questions before my sons received vaccines because quite frankly they didn't know the right questions to ask. I mindlessly allowed my children to be sacrificed to the false god of herd immunity without researching vaccines for myself.

    The Federal government has conceded in two cases in vaccine court that vaccines do cause autism in previously normal children -- Hannah Poling and Bailey Banks.

    http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=980CE5DE1130F93BA35750C0A...

    http://www.ageofautism.com/2009/02/government-again-concedes-vaccines-ca...

    But there is too much information and studies "proving" both sides to really have this argument here.

    I hope you never have cause to research vaccines to the extent I have. But honestly -- I'd take measles any day of the week over autism. And I will never again choose "herd immunity" over the health of my children.

    04.07.09 - 09:25 PM
  • 361. Kelly said:

    I couldn't have said this any better than you just did. Thank you for articulating it in such a wonderful way. I haven't read the other comments, but I hope that no one flames you for your opinion.

    Thanks for your blog, I absolutely can't go a day without reading!

    Take care!

    04.07.09 - 09:26 PM
  • 362. Briana said:

    My mother went back to school in 2000 to work with handicapped children. Her final project was on autism and links to vaccinations. Previously my sisters had both been stopped from having certain vaccinations (due to severe allergies). Then after doing her research, my mother decided she did not wish for us to have any more vaccinations. Studies that had come out in the past couple of years showed evidence that they were possibly linked. Although schools here require children to receive certain vaccinations to attend school, my mother was able to get around these requirements.

    Now in light of new information that some studies had been fabricated (and that I am now an adult), I think I will renew my vaccinations I did not receive. I was tested recently and only my rubella needs to be renewed. I understand why people feel strongly about receiving vaccinations and giving them to their children. However, as my mother works closely everyday with autistic children, I completely support her decision in light of the information and research she had done at the time.

    04.07.09 - 09:29 PM
  • 363. Leah said:

    I think that people simply forget what happens when people aren't vaccinated. It wasn't many generations ago when mothers didn't expect all of their children to survive to adulthood.

    Vaccinations are the foremost reason why the childhood mortality rate has declined to a level where the death of a child is an uncommon tragedy and not a sad rite of passage for all families.

    04.07.09 - 09:29 PM
  • 364. momomatic said:

    As the mother of two boys that have gotten each and every one of their immunizations, I offer up an agnostic amen! Only in this freakin' country would a parent say "Eh, not necessary" to vaccinations that ABSOLUTELY can save a child's life.

    This is one of those instances where I want to beat the crap out of my fellow Americans.

    04.07.09 - 09:33 PM
  • 365. happyhedonist said:

    I think you've articulated your thoughts very well here. I also observe that we're all working with incomplete information - as is always the case with science, especially medical science - *and* a very heavy media bias, one that exaggerates the risks of not vaccinating; vaccinating being the 'norm' pressed upon parents who go to pediatricians for well-baby care.

    I don't think 'pressed upon' is putting it too harshly. It may be putting it too *mildly*.

    Information on reactions to vaccines is not readily available. There is a lot of pressure on the medical community to downplay, obfuscate, and ignore the risks and reactions posed by vaccines that are the centerpiece for very profitable well-baby care. This seems to be a logical and predictable result of 'health care' operating as a for-profit industry.

    The media, which is also paid for by a well-monied advertising industry, is similarly deaf to reports of risks and adverse reactions. Government is heavily affected by lobbyist dollars. You get, as always, exactly what you pay for. And individual families who have suffered at the hands of vaccine manufacturers do not have the wherewithall to compete financially with these enormous and profitable industries. If every story was worth a dollar, we'd have balanced information to be going on with ... but they aren't, so we don't.

    The stories we *do* hear challenging vaccine efficacy and reporting adverse reactions and risks are therefore likely to be emotionally charged anecdotes from individuals in public forums; impassioned and reflecting the hurt that comes with not only the initial betrayal and physical suffering, it is tempting to dismiss these stories which are muddied with feelings of having been ignored, put off, and disbelieved by those financially powerful outlets (medical and media, and government). No one wants to believe their families could be similarly victimized.

    Hearing complaints of government conspiracy therefore does not shock me, or inspire in me suspicion of those complaining of it. Finding these organized groups and their money stacked against you as an individual and realizing your powerlessness seems like the perfectly logical reaction to the game as it is set up for us to play it. No one who wasn't harmed would need to dig deep enough into the bureaucracy to reveal these relationships. It's easier to dismiss injustices you don't share than to dig for their roots.

    All medical care involves risk, just as all of life involves risk. Our lives are made up of people, all of whom are perfectly human and flawed in their own ways. It's fine to admit you don't understand someone else's choice, as long as - like the choices you make for yourself and your own family - you accept that they are their choices to make. Just like I don't want Rush Limbaugh insisting that he has a right to influence my vote, no one who doesn't sleep in my house has a right to assert their will on my family's health care choices. Period.

    As a parent, the relevant question is: Where do you hope to get accurate information about the risks you're taking, with vaccines or without them? And if the information you can get is clearly biased, then how do you make a choice, and whom do you trust?

    Parents have to trust themselves to choose for their children and families; some trust the judgment of their doctors; some prefer to research and trust themselves; some prefer to trust friends or the experience of other parents. No method is inherently superior to the other. There is always risk.

    04.07.09 - 09:36 PM
  • 366. kellie said:

    I'm not a parent or a health care professional-- I'm a 19-year-old childless college student with minimal scientific skills (yeah, English majors), but I still definitely have thoughts on this subject.

    Because of my age, I grew up before the immunization debate became prevalent, and so everyone I know in my own age range was immunized. Now that I'm in charge of my own health care decisions, I continue to get vaccinations-- for meningitis, before I started living in my college dorm, and for HPV. The latter is simply a personal choice, but I like to think that I got the former due to its impact on others, not myself. When I travel to other countries that have a prevalence of diseases to which I have not been exposed, I get any vaccination my doctor recommends-- not because I don't want to get sick on my vacation and have a shitty time but because I don't want to get my friends sick upon my arrival back in the States.

    My brother, who is two years younger than I am and was also vaccinated, has an autism spectrum disorder (which, believe me, is NOT the worst thing that's ever happened to my family); my parents do not blame vaccinations and continue to stick by this belief after reading a lot of research on the subject. I asked my mom tonight after reading this post and some of the comments if she's ever questioned that-- she admitted that she has, but that, ultimately, she'd feel much worse if her un-vaccinated child passed along a disease that killed another child. Her exact comment: "No one wants to lose a child-- I'd rather have a slightly more difficult child-raising for myself than rob someone else of theirs."

    Obviously, everyone has different beliefs and different experiences, and they are all valid. I'm not trying to fight anyone, just expressing the experiences of my own family and how they've shaped our thoughts on the subject.

    04.07.09 - 09:40 PM
  • 367. Karen said:

    A very well put post, Ms. Armstrong. I'm impressed with the thought put into your post, and after reading one page of the comments that follow, I have to say that I'm extremely impressed by how smart/thoughtful your readers are! You attract a fine breed of blog-readers, Heather!

    04.07.09 - 09:42 PM
  • 368. CJC said:

    My brother died of AIDS. I took care of him for the last 3 months of his life. I got a good detailed look at what happens when you don't have a functioning immune system. I was so eager to get my kids vaccinated!! Being able to get protection from a list of horrible diseases is a huge blessing. It's sad that people so totally disregard the experiences of others who are 2-3 generations older.

    My husband's aunt got Rubella while pregnant. Her child was born with a number of problems, including deafness and mild brain damage. It seems to me those handicaps isolate her as much as autism.

    My mental concept of autism is that there are a number of underlying causes (viral, bacterial triggers, chemicals, ??) that affect a similar part of the brain, thus creating a set of symptoms that looks the same. I think there's some kind of trigger that hasn't been identified yet which is creating the hugely increased number of autism cases. I've recently been diagnosed with Lyme disease and have been reading a lot about it. I was surprised to learn that there is a higher-than-normal coincidence of Lyme disease and autism. Lyme can affect brain function in a number of ways; perhaps it is a trigger as well.

    Thanks for the great post. Impressive comments by everyone else, too!

    04.07.09 - 09:53 PM
  • 369. Megan said:

    Heather-

    I've read for a long time, and as someone who "shares" their house with an Aussie (and by that I mean in constant battle with said dog), I've loved every minute and photo. But I am also a research scientist who works on the immune response to infectious diseases. And so I finally post....

    Thank you for such a brave and honest, and honestly conflicted post about childhood vaccination. It's hard to distinguish what we know best about society's health with what is best for an individual. But your phrasing was so eloquent and well stated; you should be quoted in ethics lectures in medical schools for how to talk to new parents! Those that can tolerate the vaccine should do it - for their health, and for the health of the FEW who can't. The concept of herd immunity is so important, as evidenced by the recent measles outbreaks we've seen in this country. But herd immunity - the idea that we will not spread infection past the first unlucky few if the rest of the "group" is protected is important. This is why children in our country no longer die of totally preventable diseases.

    I encourage all parents of children, all parent of pets, all children of elderly to utilize the vaccines that have been developed to prevent these infections. How painful to lose someone you love to something preventable - how terrible to jeopardize others and inflict that pain on another family.

    This is an instance where I truly feel it is important to think about the world as a whole, not just the world within your walls.

    04.07.09 - 10:05 PM
  • 370. Terri said:

    Oh course I vaccinated my children. The alternative was unheard of "in my day" (I can't believe I say things like "in my day") and no one gave us a choice! Additionally if you didn't vaccinate your child didn't get into school.

    Yes, people should make their own decisions, pro choice and all that, but PEOPLE, HELLO, WAKE UP...VACCINES PREVENT serious LIVE THREATENING diseases. Life Threatening as in YOUR CHILD COULD DIE.

    That said my kids suffered from ADD. I've often wondered, lately (they are in their 30's now) if it was due to the vaccines. But, unless they can prove to me that was the cause I have to chalk it up to just another thing I might have done to my child without knowing it (along with having wine at 9 months pregnant - at my Dr. suggestion), smoking (fortunately I was too sick to do it often but when I wasn't smoking I was traveling on an airplane or eating next to people who were), sticking them on the car seat beside me because at the time there was little else to do with a baby...so, sure, I hope I did my children no harm. And, if I had it to do over, today, I'd make the same decision based on the information available.

    But I'll tell you as a mother the thoughts of "did I make the right decisions" never completely go away. Never. They just run along beside you ready to pounce when you least suspect it. So, regardless of what you decide today I can assure you to some extent twenty years from now you will question your decision. It goes with the territory. I made some decisions a year ago and have wondered just this week if my husband and I did the right thing. I think we did - but questioning "was it right for my kids" is something you'll have to live with the moment you decide to have a child.

    04.07.09 - 10:07 PM
  • 371. Anonymous said:

    Seriously whoever wrote this (see below) scares me a HELL OF A LOT more than any vaccine ever would:

    I have not immunised my children.... and have strong opinions about live virus vaccinations which precluded me from doing so. They are now 10 and 12 and have had measles, chicken pox and even whooping cough after being exposed to immunised children who became ill. I took the responsibility of my choices seriously and quarantined them for their entire illnesses.
    I do, however, not judge anyone who chooses to immunise their own. I agree that it is a first world luxury to choose. And I'm grateful for that luxury.
    What I wanted to say to you, however, was that I appreciate how wonderfully worded your post was. I read no judgement and if more people were willing to have open discussions about controversial topics WITHOUT flaming, the world would

    04.07.09 - 10:09 PM
  • 372. Kim said:

    I gotta say, Heather, I completely agree with you, especially about protecting the children who can't be immunized with the children who are immunized. I have a son who is a heart transplant recipient and spent the first 7 months of his life in the hospital. He has to take drugs that suppress his immunity in order to keep his body from rejecting his new heart. One of the problems of this is that he cannot have live virus vaccinations which include the MMR vaccination. Because of his compromised immunity he is the perfect target to catch anything and everything that is floating around and to put it bluntly, I am scared sh@!less that my son could die because a parent decides not to vaccinate their child. Don't get me wrong, I respect a parent's opinion and their instincts but the bottom line is that this is not just about their child, this is about everyone's child and I didn't spend months and months watching my son struggle for life to have it be taken from him because of what I feel is an irresponsible decision. I know that to some people those are fightin' words but I take this seriously. I feel very strongly that when you make the decision not to vaccinate your child you are asking every parent around you to put their own child's life at risk. It is frustrating for me because the only position I am able to have is one of a complainer. I get that every mother only wants what is best for their child, I just feel like my decision of what I feel is best for my child (and my situation where I can only vaccinate him for certain things) becomes ineffective when there are others who's decisions cancel out mine.

    04.07.09 - 10:09 PM
  • 373. Mandi said:

    Great Post... and great comments by everyone. I live in Oklahoma and right now the law is that you MUST bring your vaccination and immunization record so that the public schools know that the children are immunized. This makes PERFECT sense to me. Let's keep our children safe. I know many mother's who are upset by this law, and think it's not "fair". I chose to immunize my daughter, and had no problems at all. It was great to hear so many sides of this issue. Thank you.

    04.07.09 - 10:09 PM
  • 374. D said:

    As the mother of a child on the autistic spectrum I opened your post today very warily. Few things make me as mad as people who use the possibility of their children developing autism as a reason not to vaccinate. What a relief to read your wonderful post and all these sensible comments. Thank you Heather and everyone! My beautiful boy has a condition that makes him see and interact with the world in a different way to the 'typicals' and we are trying our hardest to help him and us deal with that. That is not a life threatening condition. It is heartbreaking to think that the pain experienced by parents searching for answers may have generated this pseudo science.

    04.07.09 - 10:09 PM
  • 375. Brian in Chicago said:

    What's interesting also is just how long this debate has been waged in the United States and just how intensely debated it was and continues to be. Benjamin Franklin, back in his "newspaper" days used to stir up sales of his paper with "guest columns" about the then emerging notion of vaccinations. As I recall, the disease in question was smallpox, but folks weighed in mightily about the efficacy of these medicines and whether they would work.

    As always, Heather, your empathy and humor are most appreciated. After four years + of reading your blog, I am always entertained and enlightened here. Great to meet you in Chicago last month for the book signing. I don't get out of the Loop much, so it was more than an adventure to see you in Oak Brook.

    I hope the rest of your tour goes well -- along with the book sales.

    04.07.09 - 10:11 PM
  • 376. Laura said:

    To reiterate #69...Correlation does not equal causation!!!

    Autism is a form of mental retardation. We don't give a certain food to a baby and then it all of a sudden turns into a baby with Down's: so why would we give a shot to a baby and then say the baby has autism?

    The doctor that made the correlation is a quack, and unfortunately, the damage was done. No matter how much science and logic try to counter the "claim," it will always be fact in some people's minds.

    Take it from a speech path that works with autistic children.

    04.07.09 - 10:12 PM
  • 377. Swati said:

    You are right. Each person who decides against vaccination is doing so with the knowledge that disease - debilitating, killing disease - is rare enough to weigh the odds against vaccination. And why is that? It is because all the others have been vaccinated. Vaccination is more than a choice - it is also a public duty. Modifications, yes. Avoiding certain vaccines because of medical reasons, yes. These are acceptable. Rest, in my opinion, is plain foolish as well as inconsiderate.

    04.07.09 - 10:12 PM
  • 378. Julie said:

    My husband is an immunologist and we both thank you for bringing this issue to the forefront in such a level-headed and informed way. We've vaccinated both our children and wouldn't dream of doing otherwise, for their sake and our community's sake.

    04.07.09 - 10:13 PM
  • 379. Catherine McP said:

    I havent read any of the responses and my kids are in their 20's. but WHAT ARE PEOPLE THINKING ABOUT THAT DONT GET THEIR KIDS VACCINATED? To me thats insane, Lets bring the iron lung back in fashion.

    04.07.09 - 10:15 PM
  • 380. jen said:

    maybe it is time to rethink the recommended schedule since so many more people are requesting alternate schedules that space the shots out more? no one wants their baby to get sick and certainly no one wants someone else's baby to get sick from their baby. maybe there is a new schedule everyone - parents and drs - can agree on?

    our pediatrician admitted to us that the current aggressive immunization schedule is partly due to interest in reducing administrative overhead (cramming so many shots into so few office visits). my OB admitted that the hep b shot given at birth and during infancy is a "societal safety net" - the assumption is that a certain % of people will act stupidly later in life so why not nip hep b in the bud starting at birth?

    we are immunizing our son on an alternate schedule. for me, all it took was one look at MY immunization schedule compared to the current CDC recommended schedule to think twice about just blindly following it (so many people say "but you got all the shots and you are fine": yes, i got all the shots recommended back in the 70s. a fraction of what is on the current schedule).

    immunizations are a miracle, but health care is also a business. parents need to get informed and stay informed on this issue.

    04.07.09 - 10:28 PM
  • 381. Paige said:

    Thank you, thank you, thank you!

    It breaks my heart to hear women blogging about abandoning vaccinations. Delaying vaccinations, that's one thing,and I can support a mother's choice to do such.. but I've heard more and more people deciding not to vaccinate--at all.

    I think one problem is people who are rearing their children at this day and hour do not know the horror of epidemic disease. I don't know the horror of epidemic disease myself, but as a (soon-to-be) nurse, I've read countless studies citing the safety and NECESSITY of vaccines.

    04.07.09 - 10:30 PM
  • 382. Anonymous said:

    I think your post was very well worded. Certainly vaccinations can produce adverse effects/outcomes on some people, AS CAN ANY MEDICAL PROCEDURE intended to help someone. I think following on to the 'logic' that many people use, they should therefore avoid any preventive, palliative, or curative medical help at all lest it should prove harmful in their particular situation. Yes, I am saying they should eschew any medical attention whatsoever in case they might possibly have an unforeseen or unknown problem with it. Even if it means it would prevent a known health risk or problem down the road. That's right. Risk your health and your life and the health and the lives of others. Let's get rid of doctors while we're at it. And hospitals. And medicine. Yeah, medicine.

    04.07.09 - 10:32 PM
  • 383. lukymom22 said:

    I don't remember much about being 5, but I do remember how ill I was with the measles. Thanks for taking the time to reflect and then write on this; you may have saved some lives. Hope so.

    04.07.09 - 10:35 PM
  • 384. Tracy said:

    I live in Switzerland.

    Currently, no child must be vaccinated in order to attend school.

    Measles? A huge problem in Switzerland. Such a problem that it was written about to warn travelers during the European Football Championship.

    http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=8043

    It is starting to get the media attention that it deserves here. The mothers I talk to have vaccinated their children for measles and talk about their feelings about whether or not other kids should be as well. They seem to agree that all children should be vaccinated for measles in order to attend school.

    Last week, all parents were asked to give our childrens shot records to their teachers. I think that the teachers want to see what vaccinations the kids have had and particularly if the kids were vaccinated against measles.

    A school in Switzerland recently had a huge measles outbreak and a young girl died. She wasn't vaccinated.

    My kids have had all the vaccinations that they need.

    I, also, made sure they had the chicken pox vaccine while we were visiting in the States a few years ago. The feeling here in Switzerland is that chicken pox is not life threatening. My daughters teachers told the parents of infected children to go ahead and send them to class which resulted in most of the kids catching it. The bus was full of pox covered kids. All the mothers laughed about it. My girls did not catch it because of being vaccinated. I do know that some children have died from chicken pox. When I was in third grade I got it so bad that I could not walk because it was on the soles of my feet. I was miserable.

    I have, also, had measles. I was around three years old and can still remember thinking that I was dying. I was so sick that I can not explain it but after over thirty years I still remember it.

    I am for vaccinations and will continue to keep my kids up to date according to the US standards.

    In my humble opinion, prevention is the best medicine.

    04.07.09 - 10:38 PM
  • 385. Sarah said:

    I'm with you 100 percent. You couldn't have said it better. I heard the This American Life broadcast that included this story and it made me so angry about this issue all over again. I know that parents have the right to choose for their children, BUT- they don't live on a remote island. The parents who do not immunize their children are not thinking about the fact that they live in a collective society, and that we must all work together to protect each other from things like deadly diseases. It's our responsibility- to EACH OTHER, if we all want to live peacefully among each other, to protect ourselves and our neighbors.

    Another thing I just don't understand is the reliance on "other people" to immunize their children. I mean, they're not vaccinating their own children because they believe they won't catch the disease because other kids are safe--- which means they KNOW that vaccines work... they're just willing to let these "CERTAIN" side effects harm other people's children? And I know others have already brought it up, but the "scientific data" linking autism to vaccines was FAKE. Seems a lot more like self-preservation and leeching off of the parents who decided to take the sane route and vaccinate rather than a stance against the pharmaceutical companies and healthcare system.

    04.07.09 - 10:38 PM
  • 386. Ally said:

    I used to read this blog for a short time, but I STOPPED reading because all the advertisements were overpowering and obnoxious. Now, I can see that your opinions are overpowering and obnoxious, and I have NOT missed anything. You're only alienating your readers, with your biased, unprofessional opinion. You obviously are NOT perfect with raising your daughter, so don't criticize other mothers for their beliefs.

    04.07.09 - 10:40 PM
  • 387. Mary B said:

    Pro-vaccination propaganda and scare-mongering makes me laugh. It's normal for children to get measles and chicken pox. It doesn't really do them any harm and their bodies develop a natural immunity that prevents them from getting those diseases again.

    What really makes me laugh are the parents of vaccinated children who are worried about them associating with un-vaccinated children. Won't the vaccination protect them?

    04.07.09 - 10:45 PM
  • 388. Crystall said:

    Well, I have to say, first of all, that I agree with you and believe that childhood vaccinations are a must. I also feel that they should be given according to the schedule typically followed at most pediatricians offices.
    But, in saying that I also confess that as we speak, my 7 month old daughter is overdue for some vaccinations and part of me is terrified. I am not typically one to drag my feet. I know that she is in some danger of contracting a potentially life-threateing disease; however, in December, my daughter (then three months old)was lying near death in a hospital bed with some mystery illness. She was an inpatient for a month. She was seen by 4 neurologists, 5 pediatricians, and a GI doctor- none of which expected her to survive. Obviously, the whole ordeal was a complete nightmare. Her pediatricians did NOT rule out her vaccinations as the cause; so, truthfully, I worry. I have gotten two vaccines for her since she has been home; and, as previously stated, she is due for two more this week. Thankfully, her pediatrician agrees that we should proceed with my daughter's vaccinations with caution and at a slower pace.

    Having said all of this, I will still go to get these vaccines for her. I may pray a lot and cry my eyes out while doing it, but I will. Vaccines protect children from too many illnesses to ignore and prevent many many more illnesses than they are accused of causing. That is a fact.

    04.07.09 - 10:48 PM
  • 389. Cherie said:

    I definitely agree with your thoughts on the "herd" immunity. Flu vaccinations are currently available for free to children under 5 in Australia because there have been several fatalities in recent years due to aggressive flu strains. My son is not able to have a flu vaccination because he is allergic to egg so I rely on other people to vaccinate their children so that his exposure is minimised. I cringe when I hear people say oooh I don't know if I will, the little ones get so grumpy with flu vaccinations. Spend some time in the children's ward at the hospital, grumpy doesn't even begin to cover what the alternative means for the children and their families.

    04.07.09 - 10:49 PM
  • 390. Cactus Petunia said:

    If the parents who choose not to vaccinate their children for these easily preventable, yet sometimes fatal "childhood diseases" would think just a bit farther along the thread, they just might conclude as I did-that it would be far preferable to vaccinate and save possibly many other lives than just my own child's.
    And the small possibility that the immunizations could trigger autism in my child weighed against the larger possibility that my child COULD DIE, or cause another child to die through the spread of a disease that I could have prevented? No contest.

    Thanks, Heather for your heartfelt and eloquent statement.

    04.07.09 - 10:49 PM
  • 391. Tracy said:

    To insane mombrain...

    All countries in the world have immigration.

    American is a country of immigration. You would not be there otherwise (unless you are 100 percent American Indian).

    I am an American living in Switzerland.
    I am an immigrant.

    People travel...Internationaly. The world is more and more connected.

    Scary,huh?

    Perhaps, Americans should wrap up the entire country in aluminium foil?

    That might keep all the bad "germs" out. ;)

    04.07.09 - 10:53 PM
  • 392. Uma said:

    This is the kind of debate that makes me realize how short people's memories are. The Salk vaccine was only discovered in the 50s and polio is still very much a problem in a lot of countries. I grew up in India where polio still exists because not all kids get vaccinated, partially out of poverty and partially out of ignorance, and some kids whose parents took all the precautions still get caught infected. No educated parent in India will ever question vaccinating kids against diseases such as polio. Polio can only be prevented through mass immunizations, so sometimes it is about collective responsibility and it isn't always up to the parents to decide. I agree that parents do have a right to question things but does it really have to be all or nothing?

    04.07.09 - 10:55 PM
  • 393. Lotta SVOBODA said:

    I'm with you on this one all the way. I think we need to work on campaigning for cleaner vaccines. (No mercury, etc.) But we can't endanger other children by not vaccinating.

    04.07.09 - 10:57 PM
  • 394. insane mombrain said:

    Hi, 275 again,
    Just thought I should clarify a bit. My son that had the reaction received them in 1996 when the vaccinations still contained thymerisol (sp) and mercury. Also, I live in Utah, and only 1 one of my 5 children is statistically current on his immunizations. When you go to register them for school, if they are not current, you have to either bring them current in an insanely short period of time, or go to the health dept. and sign a paper which puts them in a database, and then you get a lecture. Basically just to let you know that you are a rotten parent. It is just a delightful experience. They do not care about modified scheduling, don't even know what that means, and act as if you are some sort of hippy idiot.
    Also, even though it was years later that I finally found a doctor who confirmed that it was the vaccines that caused my sons problems, it was, apparently, too late to file a Vaccine Adverse Event Report, or VAERS. I asked numerous doctors at that time to file a report, but was always told that there was no proof that it was caused by the shots. I feel that by not reporting these incidents, they are robbing every parents of the right to make an informed decision. I also believe that there is a HUGE link between the rise of autoimmune disorders, asthma, ADD and ADHD, just to name a few, and the numerous vaccines shoved down our throats. My son is the only one of my 5 children to have ADHD, and I don't feel that it is just a coincidence.
    As for all the new vaccines, I am waiting. I didn't give any of them the chicken pox vax, and as my only daughter is just 4, I have time on my side to see what is going to happen with the HPV.
    As someone else said, I resent the hell out of a government that dictates that I have to put these chemicals into my childs body, then refuses to acknowlege that there may be a problem, like the inability to BREATHE anymore, or think clearly. There is a need for vaccines, I truly believe that, but every child is different, and it is time we all realize that.

    04.07.09 - 11:04 PM
  • 395. Alison said:

    Here's my story: I had my kids in France in 1995 and 1998. The only vaccine I didn't allow was HepB; it was new when my second child was born. My kids had the vaccines they needed in order to enter day care, preschool, and school. At the time, I had no clue that there might be a link between vaccines and autism, and can say I'm glad I was clueless!

    Here's my friend's story: She had her first child in Australia. The vaccine "regime" seemed a bit aggressive and a bit much. When her second child was born in France, she didn't have her vaccinated. The second child contracted whooping cough. My friend had her third child vaccinated.

    I have a couple of acquaintances whose children showed signs of autism after being vaccinated; my heart goes out to them. But you are right: vaccines save lives. There's no reason not to do it.

    04.07.09 - 11:05 PM
  • 396. julie said:

    thank you thank you thank you thank you

    04.07.09 - 11:19 PM
  • 397. Alison said:

    It's Alison of comment #395 again...

    Both my kids had had chickenpox before the vaccine came out. The three-year-old gave it to the baby, and it was done.

    However, I'm not sure about Gardasil for my about-to-be-14 year old daughter. I get it. I get the importance. Someone gave me genital warts in college, so I *really* get it. As far as I know, the vaccine is not yet available in France (where my kids still live). On verra...

    04.07.09 - 11:23 PM
  • 398. Emma said:

    Vaccines are not a replacement for good hygiene. As a mom who has deferred vaccinating my 19month old I know that I must make other choices beyond just not vaccinating including extended breastfeeding, careful hand washing and not spending time in large groups of children. It is a careful and thoughtful process. It requires a commitment.

    04.07.09 - 11:29 PM
  • 399. insane mombrain said:

    To Tracy from 275

    I knew that was going to be taken WRONG, and I could have worded it better. I do not just blame immigration as a the sole reason for the new outbreaks. In fact, I have a cousin who visited China about 10 yrs ago and contracted SARS, which I can assure you, is a horrid condition. Did she catch it in her local grocery store? No, but she rarely leaves the house to protect others. I also have a medical condition that effects my immune system adversely, and I have no answers for that conundrum, and it may be easier if I were able to wrap myself in a protective coating to avoid any risk. I don't have the answers, and I was not just referring to people immigrating to this country, but I do believe that when in Rome...if I am in essence required to vaccinate my children, shouldn't others entering the country have to do the same?
    I realize that we are ALL immigrants, and I am not of the opinion that we should all bubble wrap ourselves, and I know we are all connected....thus herd immunizing...which I kinda resent. Did not mean to offend, but I know of MANY people in the area of the country I live in who feel exactly the same. But I don't have the answer, and unless you have a great surplus of foil, I don't think you do either. And America isn't the only country with immigration policies, in fact, all of them do. I am just suggesting that by skirting them, we are ALL at an increased risk. I am sure you are not living in Switzerland illegally are you? This is TOTALLY off topic...sorry you feel offended

    04.07.09 - 11:37 PM
  • 400. joyluck76 said:

    Great post. I will add that I agree with some of the posters who've mentioned the trigger can be saying vaccinations don't cause autism. But, the fact is, there is NO SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE to support a statement that vaccinations can cause autism. The problem lies less with vaccinations and more with how little is known, historically, about autism and it's causes. A lot of parents don't realize that signs of autism don't show up until about the time certain vaccinations are given, which can lead to an impression in parents that the vaccination was the cause of the autism. There may be something to the idea that a vaccine could exacerbate symptoms of autism, but that is likely also a stretch. There simply is no proof vaccines cause autism and as many here have stated, including yourself Heather, the risk of not vaccinating our children has much greater, proven repercussions. Great post. Thanks!

    04.07.09 - 11:43 PM
  • 401. Linda said:

    My son and his wife have decided not to immunize their children which terrifys me. And they also live in Switzerland right now which, by the way, is the least vaccinated country in the world. I'm so afraid one of my grandchildren will get polio or whooping cough. I don't understand their decision at all. They base their decision on mercury in the vaccinations and the control of the huge pharmacy countries. I understand their concerns but am so worried.

    04.07.09 - 11:43 PM
  • 402. Emily said:

    off the subject... What is SXSW?
    And definitely all for vaccinations. Another outbreak is inevitable!!!

    04.07.09 - 11:57 PM
  • 403. Kate said:

    I had my oldest daughter (now three) immunized completely and on schedule. I felt fine about it. My second daughter who is now one has only had her 2 month shots. I have a gut feeling that tells me to hold off and do them slowly. I realize there are risks, and I have tried to talk myself into just continuing now and stop being a freak about it, but I have this stupid gut feeling. And what is motherhood if not a bunch of gut feelings about what is best for your child?

    04.08.09 - 12:02 AM
  • 404. Marina said:

    One thing to consider is that official vaccination programs differ from one country to another. I moved to Brazil when my son was 6months old and had already completed most of the required vaccinations within the UK, but once in Brazil, I found that there were many required vaccinations there that he hadn't received (BCG, of course, but also chickenpox which isn't administered in infants in the UK). In a truly global society, perhaps there should be a global vaccination scheme. In the UK, children receive the MMR at 13months - in Brazil they receive it at 2 years. Are you going to blame the child from Brazil for catching measles and spreading it on at 18months old when he visits/moves to a first world country because he hadn't been vaccinated yet?

    Also - I'm not certain of this, but I have heard that when a lot of kids react to their vaccines, it's primarily the preserving agents and chemicals (to prolong their shelf life and keep the virus stable) that they react to. I'm getting my son immunised (his final round is today, in fact!), but I'd sure feel more comfortable knowing exactly what was in these shots and if there could be a more 'organic' way of getting them into his system (e.g. without all the preservatives and chemicals).

    04.08.09 - 12:09 AM
  • 405. Tracye said:

    I think, that it is easier to question this subject matter because the women on MOMVERSATION, their kids weren't affected by vaccines. If your kid was affected by them, you'd probably be singing a whole nother tune.

    Vaccines are important but it is also important to not line up blindly and not question the establishment because you were vaccinated as a child.

    Parents who are lucky enough to not have their children affect with triple doses of vaccines purging through their tiny bodies like a virus and leaving them a shell of what their child once was, consider yourself fortunate.

    04.08.09 - 12:32 AM
  • 406. Anna Pocock said:

    In the UK, we are encouraged to give our children something like 20 different vaccines before the age of 2. Additionally, many of them are given as a multiple shot - so my 3 month old was given 5 vaccines in just one single shot. He was, perhaps understandably, a bit peaky for the following week - as I think anyone might be when your immune system is suddenly called upon to fight 5 different (and albeit dilute) types of disease as one time. But I was grateful for the protection they afforded from nasties like polio and whooping cough.

    But I had to draw a line at the MMR and instead went privately to give both my children a single measles vaccine. Neither Mumps nor Rubella are life-threatening diseases and the reasons for giving them lumped in with the really quite nasty Measles vaccine, is down to economics. I intend to ensure my daughter has the Rubella jab once she is a teenager (and long before she is sexually active) as it's vital she has protection before she ever gets pregnant. Mumps is just not a concern. I appreciate there can be some complications in adult males affecting fertility but the risk is so minute (especially compared to the fevers and convulsions that the vaccine itself can incur) that it's just not worth it at this stage.

    Thank you for bringing this important subject to light in your own imitable way.

    04.08.09 - 12:33 AM
  • 407. Alli said:

    I agree with you 100% and I thought you put that beautifully.

    Thank you..

    I have an autistic child, and his autism was NOT caused by the vaccinations he was given.

    04.08.09 - 12:44 AM
  • 408. Mona said:

    I am a first time reader of your blog (after seeing you on Oprah) and a parent presented with the decision to vaccinate my 12-month old daughter (or not). I have been toiling over this decision since her 6 month shots were administered, all the while, conducting my own research about the correlation between vaccines and autism. I consider it serendipitous that this topic was presented at the very moment that it has been top of mind for me. I wanted to thank you for opening up the subject with such candor and thoughtfulness, and to also thank everyone for their fantastic opinions and anecdotes. It gives someone like myself, a first time mom who was indifferent to the subject before motherhood, great insight into the variables at hand when making such a decision. Thank you.

    04.08.09 - 12:48 AM
  • 409. Anne said:

    Thank you Heather for your measured and clear comments on this.

    04.08.09 - 12:49 AM
  • 410. Shalini said:

    Thank you for such a well -written post on this subject.

    My then 9 month old daughter (this was May 2006) was exposed to Chickenpox at the doc's office, and was previously too young to get the vaccine... to complicate matters we had just flown to Seattle when symptoms (i.e. fever, and a couple spots) started to be apparent... for a new mom in a city that she didn't know far away from her pediatrician, you can bet I was PIZZZZZED off at the idiot lady who had her 10 year old at the doc's office with chxpox... there was NO Neeeeed for him to be there as he was old enough for the vaccine... luckily my daughter got on antiviral meds which really lessened the symptoms.. but it just makes me so sad that when there is really no clear cut links that say vaccine = autism that ppl just up and don't/won't research about vaccines, they just take the media created frenzy and the put others at risk.

    I understand that what we want is for all our kids to be healthy, but be responsible about it.. like the first commenter who didn't do vaccines for various reasons and then QUARANTINED her kids... that's what everyone should do when there is a threat to other children's health.

    Again thank you for bringing up a very timely topic!

    04.08.09 - 01:00 AM
  • 411. Anonymous said:

    I really value that so many people here have been respectful and tolerant and supportive of other people's choices.

    I do think most people are well intentioned. And I think every parent wants to protect their child and has their welfare at heart.

    But I also think many people make less than great choices for their children on a regular basis based on a variety of reasons (lack of education, spiritual beliefs that trump scientific evidence, etc) and the same is true when it comes to vaccinations.

    The problem is compounded in this case because not vaccinating is in vogue now due to the autism scare. So the social construct around vaccination is crumbling at the same time we are losing our collective memory of the dangers of the diseases the vaccines were meant to prevent.

    We have got to get to a place where people can assess information more intelligently. Better education, maybe mandatory public health classes.

    And this may be controversial to say but I really hope we can get away from validating this or that "belief" and start to differentiate belief from facts. It is not the same thing. We should be respectful of how people feel and try to find the best way to convince them to do what's best for their family and their community. But it seems to me in an effort to be inclusive we elevate the fringe to the center at times. And we do so at our own peril. We have seen the same thing happen with other more public policy issues like global warning and evolution. Suddenly one day the President announces that "creationism is just another theory about the origin of life."

    No. It's not.

    The same goes for vaccinating.

    We have allowed individuals to deter the discussion away from public health and now a lot of unsuspecting parents are being duped by the misinformed into thinking not vaccinating is a reasonable alternative to vaccinating ordinary children. It is not.

    I am not trying to turn the discussion in another more contentious direction. The reasonable tone of the discussion seems to be helping people who are on the fence. But I for one long for a day when we recognize that people believe a lot of crazy stuff, but as a society we agree to be guided by something more than vague, fleeting, frequently contrary gut feelings. If we do not have that, we clearly haven't moved far past the superstitious days of old.

    04.08.09 - 01:13 AM
  • 412. Chrissy said:

    As a mother of a son who has autism, I agree 100% with you. In my cases (and in most cases of autism), my son showed the symptoms from BIRTH. I cannot imagine how awful it must be to see your child suddenly regress at 18 months or 2 years. However, science cannot see a link between autism and immunizations. So, if I were to have another child, I might adjust the immunization schedule for that child but I would definitely have him/her immunized. To me, the benefits outnumber the risks.

    (And I think this battle is a LOSER for the autism community. Let's focus on getting more children ABA therapy - the one thing scientifically proven to work on reversing the sighs of autism. Stop using our voice/money/effort on battling about immunizations and focus on HELPING THESE CHILDREN GET OUT OF THE CLUTCHES OF AUTISM!!!)

    04.08.09 - 01:16 AM
  • 413. Anonymous said:

    Just wondering, why are your children getting sick if you have chose to vaccinate? I thought vaccinations were to protect you children when they do happen to be exposed. Also vaccinations contain aborted cell tissue, many women feel strongly that abortion is murder.

    04.08.09 - 01:17 AM
  • 414. Aspartame said:

    My mother is completely deaf in one ear from having measles as an infant. She contracted it in the hospital where she was born, since this was before the vaccine. And she got off relatively easily. Strangely enough, her sister lost her hearing on one side in a freak thing when a wave knocked her down and popped her ear drum many years later, and now when they talk on the phone they can only hear the other gabbing.

    So I'll vaccinate my kids because measles are preventable. I'll still let them swim in the ocean even though freak accidents are not. And some weird thing could happen creating one more half deaf relative no matter what I do. It is what it is.

    04.08.09 - 02:12 AM
  • 415. Alex said:

    The more level-headed arguments concerning the link between autism and vaccines also include research which points to an increase in food and skin allergies among children over the past 25 years. While our children ARE remarkably isolated from "childhood illness" that used to be common (and sadly, commonly fatal) they have developed a rash (bad pun, sorry) of new ailments that seem to be tied to our modern, industrial lifestyle. The most persuasive arguments take a multitude of factors into account; from auto-immune disorders that have become as common as the cold, to psychological illnesses such as ADHD and autism which cases are increasing dramatically.

    I completely agree that the right to chose should be available to those who have real need and who understand the real responsibility of containing the disease should it manifest. But then there are the cases of diseases which are communicable before symptoms manifest, and what we end up with is an argument for balancing the needs of the many with the needs of the few.

    That being said, a bacterial or viral infection is equal opportunity. It doesn't know class, race, economic level or creed. Or, unfortunately, education level. I'm not willing to place (potentially) millions of children at risk because a few mothers are afraid of what "might" happen based on their incomplete understanding of the information available to them. I fully support further research into the problems, but until we come up with a better solution for eliminating the very real threat of childhood diseases and their very real, very established, consequences, I cannot support any parent who puts many others at risk to protect their own. Even as I understand it, that maternal urge to protect at all costs, I cannot rationally endorse it.

    04.08.09 - 02:28 AM
  • 416. Jennifer said:

    I agree with you. I vaccinate but we live in Italy and the vacc. schedule is not quite as dense as it is in the States. There was a whooping cough outbreak in the town where we used to live when someone from Eastern Europe brought it from their country. None of the children who were vaccinated got sick.

    04.08.09 - 02:33 AM
  • 417. Lottie said:

    I don't think it's such a straightforward issue. I think you have to do your research based on your own children, your values and your medical history - which is what Heather has done.

    Actually, one of the first polio vaccines was the CAUSE of the disease experiencing a resurgence in the early part of last century, the legacy of which is seen in a generation still living:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polio_vaccine

    And the fact that rubella can cause complications for pregnant women and their unborn children, why don't we just vaccinate women around the age of puberty? I can't condone an unnecessary vaccination for a relatively benign disease in my son, when the issue is not around how the disease will affect him. I understand that with the current vaccination structure his remaining unvaccinated would impact pregnant women but there are other ways that don't impact his immature immune system.

    Likewise, mumps is very unlikely to cause long-term complications in today's children with medical advancements are they are. Why are we vaccinating against these milder diseases when exposure would mean children would develop natural and total immunity to the disease? Boys who hadn't been exposed to the wild form of the disease could be vaccinated around puberty also, after which the implications are much more serious.

    You really can't assume either that, by vaccinating, your child will remain unaffected from diseases - they are well known not to be 100% effective:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine#Effectiveness

    And when vaccination is widespread, diseases are known to mutate and become vaccine-resistant or escape vaccine altogether. This could be very dangerous for the next generations - no natural immunity passed down from mother to child, no immune system-strengthening exposure to the milder diseases - I wouldn't want to be in that position with potential new strains of disease floating about.

    My child was born with a potentially deadly disease, was taken from me at less than a day old, had fluid taken from his spine, x-rays, blood tests and was put on intravenous antibiotics for his first week of life. He survived, and yet I still wouldn't throw him into the standard vaccination schedule without questioning, researching, understanding and then making informed choices for me and my family. But then everyone is different. It's a difficult decision to make, there are implications either way, and I understand that for some, it's a difficult issue to contemplate and vaccinations are the path of least resistance. I mean that in the kindest way.

    04.08.09 - 02:36 AM
  • 418. Mango Girl said:

    There is a reason men and women have worked their whole lives to discover these vaccinations...

    04.08.09 - 02:41 AM
  • 419. Anna O'Brien, UK said:

    Thank you for raising this crucial subject. My 13-month-old is about to have the triple measles, mumps and rubella vaccine - that which was erroneously linked to autism by a doctor who has since, I believe, been struck off the medical register in the UK. I have read thoroughly around the subject, and believe ABSOLUTELY that vaccinating my baby is the right thing to do. As a liberal myself, I live in a liberal community where vaccination compliance rates are relatively low and it scares the f*ck out of me that my baby's classmates at nursery may not have been vaccinated and might bring measles to the community. Measles proves fatal for one in fifteen children at her age and, like you, I would never forgive any parent who brought it to the community by not vaccinating their child.

    I applaud you for raising the very different issue of the vaccination schedule which I also believe to be fairly aggressive. I sat with my family doctor when my baby was 2 months old, and worked out a vaccination schedule that would leave her fully protected, but would give her body time to adapt to the vaccinations being introduced into her system. If anyone has a doctor not prepared to do this, then look elsewhere. It's the least you can expect.

    04.08.09 - 02:58 AM
  • 420. Jessica said:

    Hmmmm.... an autistic child vs. a dead child... I don't get the issue here. Yes, autism is a terrible thing. And yes, my heart goes out to all parents of children who have autism. But my heart goes out more to the parents who have lost children to illness.

    I have chosen the vaccination route too. With all three kids and I never batted an eye. My grandmother contracted polio and was in the hospital for 9 months in an iron lung while her two very young children lived, frightened at home awaiting her safe return. The doctors were pretty certain that the kids were exposed to the disease though they themselves never became infected she did. She spent the next 50 years in a wheel chair, paralyzed from the waist down.

    I couldn't handle the thought that my decision not to vaccinate a child might gravely affect the life of someone else's child.

    Now these are my thoughts on the vaccines for childhood diseases, not for newer ones like Gaurdicil which may prevent certain but not all cervical cancers and which is much too new for me to even concider without fully knowing the reprocussions.

    Autism is out there and yes it is growing but so are childhood allergies, especially the fatal ones. But vaccinations are not the cause.

    04.08.09 - 03:16 AM
  • 421. Kat said:

    I am very much like yourself in regards to the research, I actually used to work with Austic children, so heard all the other side....I did my own research extensively and discovered of the many studies there are no conclusive scientific studied linking autism to immunising..and believe I search high and low...

    I thought I'd post a link to a case of similar controversy in Australia in regards to the effects that non immunisation can have...http://www.danamccaffery.com/
    there is a recent out break in the area of whooping cough where this little baby girl lived and contracted whooping cough due to a outbreak in an area with low immunisation rates..

    I chose to vaccinate despite there be some risk, at the end of the day the risk of non vacinating my child was higher than vaccinating..

    04.08.09 - 03:19 AM
  • 422. Anonymous said:

    Emily's post, #336, has got to be one of the dumbest things I've ever read.

    04.08.09 - 03:37 AM
  • 423. Amelia Sprout said:

    I wasn't vaccinated until I started school. I totally understand parents who don't want to do it.

    I was however raised in a small town, in the country, in the middle of nowhere before immigrants and regular overseas travel with the thing (at least in Scandinavian Minnesota)

    I chose to vaccinate my daughter (nearly on schedule, we broke up a couple of things because she doesn't react super well) because I live in the city, in the heart of populations of people who's vaccination status is unknown.

    If I had been raising my daughter in a place like where I grew up, I would have made different choices. If she had shown early signs of of autism or I wasn't sure about it, i would have made different choices.

    However, there was a measles outbreak around here too, and I just couldn't life with the knowledge that if something had happened to her, I didn't do everything I should have.

    04.08.09 - 03:41 AM
  • 424. Kathy said:

    I live in Switzerland and have a 10-month old, and this issue has been on my mind a lot lately. She won't get vaccinated against measles for another two months. I am doing my PhD at the engineering university in Lausanne, while living in Zurich (so I work from home 99% of the time), and recently had to cancel a day of meetings in Lausanne because there's an EPIDEMIC of measles right now on the campus, and I would have been bringing my baby along with me. I read recently that they have at least a little version of this epidemic nearly every year in Switzerland, because only about 88% of children get vaccinated for measles. It's scary, and I hope I'm not making a mistake waiting until her 1-year visit to get her vaccinated.

    04.08.09 - 03:44 AM
  • 425. Kristen said:

    With such a powerful platform at your disposal, I feel that you have a responsibility to the parenting community to respect opinions that might be contrary to your personal beliefs. As a new mother with a 2 year old child who is suffering from severe, life-threatening allergic diseases, which cannot be traced back genetically, a parent begins to wonder how and why. Granted, my daughter's condition had nothing to do with vaccinations as far as I'm concerned, but her condition has taught me the most important lesson of all: do not judge! My daughter is up to date on all of her vaccines except for the MMR which is grown on egg cultures. She could die if she were exposed to egg. While the most common discourse on the topic of vaccinations is focused upon the risk of autism, I prefer to leave that very personal decision to the discretion of the parent, without judgement. You all should feel very blessed to have healthy children. Unfortunately, not everyone is handed the same deck of cards.

    And finally, in your story above, the 10 month old baby in California would have been exposed either way because, as far as I know, the MMR vaccine is not administered until 12 months old.

    04.08.09 - 03:47 AM
  • 426. Kathy said:

    I am old enough to have been a child before most of the vaccinations were available. I remember childhood illnesses. They were miserable. I would venture to say that most of these moms who opt out of vaccinating against measles never had the disease itself. It was a miserable experience and one I would never willingly repeat. I did survive and did not become deaf or have other lasting effects from the disease but others of my generation did.

    04.08.09 - 03:54 AM
  • 427. The Scarlett said:

    I'm one of those parents who firmly believe that my oldest son became autistic after his MMR vaccination. I have video evidence that shows that he changed quite dramatically; before he was a quite vocal child with very engaging eye contact and after he didn't speak for two years. At fifteen he still only looks you in the eye with great difficulty when prompted to do so. I believe that some children are born without the tolerance for the ingredients.

    That said, I did cautiously immunize my second son. I waited on the MMR until he was five. He was fine and so I believe that since he has a different father he came wired with a different set of tolerances. I also had him immunized for chicken pox, an illness that the rest of us had already experienced. He still got the chicken pox so that seems to me to have been a waste.

    As a child I had the measles and I can tell you that it really wasn't bad. I was five and stayed home wearing sunglasses and mittens. I don't believe that people trotted their young babies all over the place like we do now unless it was an absolute necessity. The next year I had chicken pox. By the time the symptoms appeared I had been contagious for a couple of days and had exposed my brother. People used to actually call up their friends to let them know that there was an opportunity for their kids to catch chicken pox so that they would be immune in the future.

    We don't live in a third world country. We are educated people that understand the dangers of dehydration and high fever. But I just bet those infants less than 12 months were not traveling on the plane because of actual need; they were probably going on a vacation because their parents just couldn't wait. You can't be immunized from the selfishness of adults.

    04.08.09 - 03:57 AM
  • 428. MiniHipster.com said:

    This is a very very tricky subject and there is so much information to learn from both sides. I will say however that there is also an option for those children who cannot have the standard vacination, and that is to be vacinated homeopathically. Now i do not pretend to know all the answers to this method, nor am i saying that this is the best way. I will say that it is effective and a 20 year study on this method has just been completed with positive results in its effectiveness.

    www.minihipster.com

    04.08.09 - 03:59 AM
  • 429. Jan said:

    I have vaccinated my daughter as recommended by her pediatrician. However, based on the much publicized debate, I did delay the MMR until her next visit at 18 months. I never planned to not vaccinate, just decided to wait a bit for the "big" one. I would never pass judgement on any parents choices and I try to stay steady when others pass judgement on mine. Thank you for the discussion. Makes me feel less isolated in my concerns and allows me to hear other viewpoints.

    04.08.09 - 04:03 AM
  • 430. Mary Rose said:

    I might be a little extreme in my opinion, but I equate not immunizing your children to willing smoking around them or not buckling them up in the car. They are too young to know the risks and dangers or make informed decisions, and that is where it is the parents duty to step in and make those decisions until they are old enough to. If a child can't tell you that secondhand smoke can harm them, or that they should be buckled up in case of an accident, they certainly can't tell you that they don't want to get terribly sick with illnesses that can be avoided with immunizations.

    I also had never heard of altering the immunization schedule so that multiple immunizations were not given at one time. I will be discussing this with my pediatrician when I have my 2nd baby in August. My first child seems to have reacted fine. Well, she's two, so I guess we'll have to wait out this age until we get to see her "true" nature. Thanks for the information, and for having the cajones to address this issue without sounding as fascist as I do :)

    04.08.09 - 04:04 AM
  • 431. Alison said:

    My daughter received a heart transplant at age 8, and from that moment forward, could receive no other live vaccinations because she needs to be immunosuppressed to be able to keep her new heart. We rely on others in the world maintaining their vaccinations in order to keep her healthy. Please, if you are considering not vaccinating your child because you feel it's your choice to deal with the consequences, realize that your choice can impact many, many others. Please think of more than just yourselves.

    04.08.09 - 04:08 AM
  • 432. Danielle said:

    I've just started reading your blog. You've put into words how I feel exactly. That being said, I live in Switzerland. Very close to the place where the measles outbreak you spoke of started. A young girl who could not be vaccinated died because of other peoples decision not to vaccinate their children who COULD be vaccinated. I was so thankful that my own four children had their shots. As a mother, I could not imagine watching my child suffer with a disease, knowing I could have prevented it with a simple trip to the pediatrician.

    04.08.09 - 04:21 AM
  • 433. calvalshrk said:

    To vaccinate or not. That is the question. It is a difficult question for any new parent. While the internet can be a great source of valid information the sheer volume of it all can muddy the issue. Add to that the fact that, as a biologist, I have access to journal articles many don't but even that didn't help me make the decision to vaccinate my daughter any easier. I do not regret for one moment that because of her vaccinations my daughter has a much smaller chance of suffering through some really horrific illnesses. As the planet gets more densely populated we all stand a much much greater chance of being exposed to some very scary stuff. I do understand why a parent would choose to not vaccinate, but I really hope my children don't come in contact with them if/when they have preventable illnesses.

    04.08.09 - 04:22 AM
  • 434. Anonymous said:

    I'm currently pregnant. It wasn't entirely deliberate, though my husband and I are delighted. One unfortunate side-effect of the pregnancy being not quite intentional, however, is that we didn't find out until after I was pregnant that sometime between my daughter's birth and now, my immunity to rubella wore off. If we'd been 'trying', we'd have checked it first. So I'm at risk from any non-immunised child, or adult like myself with no immunity, who may be exposed to the disease.

    Numerous studies have proven that there is no link between the vaccination and autism. They have also shown a link between autism and exposure to rubella in the womb. So to parents who weaken the herd immunity by refusing to vaccinate, on the grounds that there is a (disproven) link to autism, if your non-immunised child catches and spreads the disease, you have taken away *my* right to have a child without autism (or deafness, blindness or whatever God-awful result of exposure in the womb there might be if it happens).

    (That said, I'd rather have a disabled child than a dead one. Also a possibility if I'm infected.)

    We are all part of a society and all need to start taking collective responsibility for that society's wellbeing by vaccinating our children (and getting boosters as adults).

    04.08.09 - 04:26 AM
  • 435. Dee said:

    As a parent of two kids I can tell you I TOTALLY agree with you. I won't let my child die of measles because I am too scared to get them vaccinated.

    I didn't get some of my vaccinations when I was a kid because I was allergic to something in them. I got them later and it hurt like h***.

    I also never had chicken pox, nor was I ever vaccinated, and I live in fear of contracting it.

    Bless you for speaking out for our side.

    04.08.09 - 04:26 AM
  • 436. Bodnoirbabe said:

    For all those people who don't vaccinate because of the link to autism, you need to read this. It came out so long ago and if it's a repeat, I'm sorry, but:

    THE DOCTOR WHO SPARKED THE SCARE OVER THE SAFETY OF THE MMR VACCINE FOR CHILDREN CHANGED AND MISREPORTED RESULTS IN HIS RESEARCH, CREATING THE APPEARANCE OF A POSSIBLE LINK WITH AUTISM.

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article5683671.ece

    Continuously this doctor's papers were rejected by respected medical journals because they didn't hold any real numbers or correlation between the vaccine and autism.

    Another thing, yes, the amount of children being diagnosed with autism has gone up. But what has also changed in the past twenty years is the diagnostic standards. Prior, most children who would be considered autistic today were simply labeled as retarded. There was no distinct classification and it has only now started coming out with tests. So yes, more children are being diagnosed with autism, but this is also because autism is now a diagnosis.

    I know that it's scary, but people really have to read the entire issue, not just the parts they want. The long and short of it is that there is no medically recognized correlation between autism and vaccines and the doctor who says that there is was found to have lied and changed the results to get his conclusion.

    Stop with the unnecessary fears, people. There is enough to be worried about with your child without you making shit up as well.

    04.08.09 - 04:29 AM
  • 437. Kristin said:

    You are dead on regarding the herd immunity. And another thing (as if we need one) that should be considered is that in this lifetime, our lifetime, the vast majority of antibiotics will be rendered useless. Although I realize that vaccinations deal with viruses and antibiotics do not, it is still something to consider that a scratch while playing in the dirt could lead to a fatal bacterial infection. Perhaps we should take advantage of any immunity we can get.

    04.08.09 - 04:33 AM
  • 438. Working Girl said:

    Thank you for writing this. I'm an OB RN -- but I also grow most of my own food, teach yoga, and just generally take modern medicine with a grain of salt. While as a nurse, it is my job to educate my patients and support their decisions, I feel that the anti-vac movement is conspiracy theory at it's ugliest.

    04.08.09 - 04:46 AM
  • 439. corrin said:

    I heard the story of the measles outbreak on NPR a few months ago and I'm on the side of vaccinations being a public health issue. The risks are much less to much few people by vaccinating our children then not.

    04.08.09 - 04:48 AM
  • 440. Laurie said:

    "Which is why I think it's crucial to maintain what I've heard referred to as herd immunity so that those who really have no choice, who cannot receive vaccinations, are protected by those of us who can."

    Thank you for this. My son is a liver transplant survivor. Our transplant center believes in vaccinating their transplant recipients with all available vaccines, but many centers do not allow their patients to receive live vaccinations (Varicell Zoster, MMR, etc). These families rely so desperately on "herd immunization" to safe-guard their children. Without it, these children, whose immune systems are deliberately weakened, can die. The medication my son takes to keep his body from rejecting his liver causes him to take a week more than the average child's body does to eliminate an infection. Even WITH his immunizations in place, he spent four days in the hospital last year because he MIGHT have been exposed to Chicken Pox and had to receive IV anti-virals!

    Thank you!

    04.08.09 - 04:50 AM
  • 441. Nicole said:

    I just 100% agree with you. Thats all.

    04.08.09 - 05:00 AM
  • 442. Stacy said:

    I think that your post was incredibly thoughtful about a very difficult subject. Thanks for opening this can of worms in such an engaging manner.

    I vaccinated my boy in part because I took my responsibility to the herd very seriously.

    04.08.09 - 05:01 AM
  • 443. nobody said:

    There are vaccines and then there are vaccines. Diseases like measles, mumps, diptheria, typhoid, polio are very serious and highly preventable at very low risk. Parents choosing to forego these vaccinations against these and their like are benefitting their children from the risks my kids have borne, without running those risks themselves. This is hardly admirable.

    Over the past decade we've seen the development of vaccines for much less serious diseases, like rotavirus and flu (which isn't a great health risk for small children). Some, like chicken pox, are of debatable value to begin with as the disease is more serious in adults and the immunity from sickness lasts much longer than the immunity from the vaccine.

    The benefits of these are less dramatic, but the public health community doesn't distinguish these from the real important ones. I think it's a mistake to insist that the risk/reward balance is the same for _every_ vaccine, and that _every_ vaccine is crucial to personal and public health.

    04.08.09 - 05:05 AM
  • 444. Susan said:

    First World luxury to Third World health, possibly in the matter of a generation.

    Vaccinated my child.

    04.08.09 - 05:12 AM
  • 445. Anonymous said:

    I think one need look no further than the international flights coming into any major airport on an HOURLY basis. Not just from Europe - though I believe the measles from Switzerland should belie that myth - but from India, South America, Africa... A dear friend of mine was in Singapore on business, flew back thru Hong Kong, spent 6 hrs in SFO and then flew into the midwest to visit us. How many people did she come into contact with? How many did the hundreds of other people on her planes contact? Herd immunity only applies if you live in, um, Utah (kidding!)

    04.08.09 - 05:18 AM
  • 446. Brooke said:

    I really appreciated what you had to say and it actually opened my eyes to a new way of looking at this debate. I think you are right. I vaccinate my daughter. I think it's important and the responsible thing to do, not just for her but for others. I just wanted you to know I totally agree with what you wrote.

    04.08.09 - 05:20 AM
  • 447. Christine said:

    The explanation of why we vaccinate has been most cogently laid out here, by Jim Macdonald at Making Light:

    http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/010978.html#010978

    I would encourage everyone to read through it, especially those who are on the fence about whether or not to vaccinate their children.

    04.08.09 - 05:26 AM
  • 448. Anonymous said:

    I agree with you when you say foregoing vaccination is a first world luxury. As someone born and raised in a third world country, such a thing isn't even up for debate. It's like, are you CRAZY? First world countries have managed to overcome many diseases by immunization, but if everyone started skipping it, it sounds to me like a regression. Also, the risk of catching something outside the home or in other countries are very high. I don't know, the pros outweigh the cons for me.

    I'm not pointing the finger at anybody, but to me, it just sounds a bit reckless to expose your child to potentially life changing diseases like polio on the off chance and on oft-disproven conspiracy theories.

    04.08.09 - 05:28 AM
  • 449. Kendra said:

    Wow, I had to stop reading all the comments, because there were just too many--and I have to get something else done today. But I really appreciate your thoughtful expression of your feelings on this issue, and the throughtfulness of your readers.

    When my first son was born, I went ahead with all the vaccinations, no questions asked, until the chicken pox vaccine. It's new, since my own childhood, when it was simply an illness kids got and got over. So we hesititated to give it to him. But after a lot of discussion with my husband and our pediatrician, I realized that our dr. felt very strongly about this immunization, for all the reasons you listed, including potentially deadly side effects of getting ill with a "childhood disease." He's a wonderful dr who has seen us through numerous injuries and illnesses of our three kids, and he always takes my opinions and questions seriously. And that's why we have a pediatrician instead of treating them for everything ourselves: because I just don't know as much as he does, when it comes to kids' health. So I feel that I'm not relinquishing control of my children's health; I'm trusting someone to help me with it, because it's what he's good at. Just the same way other parents trust me to care for their children while they work. We've had no ill effects from any vaccines and I feel very strongly that we've made the right choice.

    04.08.09 - 05:29 AM
  • 450. moggit girls said:

    UGH All we got was a prelude and then a Target commercial...

    We have to agree that vaccintaing your children is a sound thing to do - of course in every vaccination there are going to be (a small majority) of children that react differently. That doesn't mean we should all throw out the baby with the bath water. Level heads people! More children are helped than harmed.

    04.08.09 - 05:31 AM
  • 451. Sharon said:

    Heather, I couldn't agree with you more. Thank you for thoughtfully and eloquently wording your opinion.

    04.08.09 - 05:32 AM
  • 452. Melanie said:

    I immunized my children on schedule, after consulting with my trusted doctor. Subsequently, I was on a forum where I was attacked by seemingly sensible, intelligent mothers for vaccinating. They pointed me towards all sorts of internet anecdotal or otherwise questionable research. I'm not a doctor (although I watch House and therefore think I am on a weekly basis) and wouldn't dare to presume that I know more than my trusted physician. A friend of mine says that when anyone starts a sentence with, "Studies have shown..." whatever comes out of their mouth next is a goddamn lie. Anyway, what shocked me about the women on this forum was that they actually said that given the "research", any mother who vaccinated their child, whether on the well-meaning advice of their doctor or not, was "abusive". It was simply amazing to me that the debate has become so polarized. All I was saying was that I was not convinced by the internet gobbledygook and decided to believe my doctor, and I was labeled abusive. Shocking.

    In my community, you cannot attend school or regulated daycare without being vaccinated. I agree wholeheartedly with this - it is an issue of public health.

    Great post.

    04.08.09 - 05:33 AM
  • 453. Vesta said:

    I agree 100% with you Heather! It infuriates me that people do not vaccinate their kids. Vaccines work! I realize there are potential side effects and that it can be scary but the alternative is so much more fightening to me. I vaccinated both my children on the aggressive schedule. I wanted to ensure that they did not come down with any of these awful diseases. I'm already thankful that my daughter will be able to receive the Gardasil vacine when she is older. (I would get it if I was within the age limit!)

    For those parents that choose not to vacinate their children, I can't respect your decision. I'm sorry. It seems to be a decision based on fear rather than logic. Yes, I was mildly concerned about the side effects but I'm worried about side effects with any medical procedure. The benefits far outweigh the risks. With antibiotics no longer working as well these days, I can't help but wonder if the treatments for these diseases would work if a child did catch mumps, rubella, whooping cough, etc......

    04.08.09 - 05:42 AM
  • 454. Michele said:

    Volatile waters these debates shove us overboard into!

    My problem with the way vaccines are presented to the huddled masses is this:

    They are foisted upon everyone regardless of individual immune function, socio-economic status or family history.

    Coming from a place of relative privilege-- a white woman living in America with a middle-class income, immuno-healthy children, access to clean water, health-care and the ability to take time off if my children are sick, I am opposed to vaccines for my children "just because".

    If our circumstances were different, if we choose to travel extensively or if my children develop issues with their immune systems, I'll revisit, I'm open to the possibility.

    While in nursing school (I live and practice in NY state), we had someone from the CDC talk to our class about vaccines and I took it as an opportunity to really investigate the issue with someone who has a very different view than mine. The bottom line from his perspective? Vaccinations vs. naturally acquired immunity is more *cost effective* from the CDC's standpoint.

    Cost effectiveness; it bears repeating. I found his admission to be enlightening to say the least and at most, shocking. I don't need or want the State of NY making parenting decisions for me based on how much money they'll save.

    I'm fortunate to have 3 very healthy children and a life that can afford me the time to tend to them if/when they become sick.

    04.08.09 - 05:45 AM
  • 455. Jojo said:

    When I was pregnant and first started researching vaccines, I could understand why why fear resulting from a now discredited study would prevent people from vaxing their kids. The more I learn, the more concerned I became. I no longer just shrug off that some people don't vax because there are areas where the rates are so low that heard immunity cannot be maintained.

    I've watched as study after study has demonstrated that vaccinations do not cause autism, as small outbreaks of these diseases have occurred in vaccinated populations, as changes to vaccines has not resulted in lower ASD rates, and really thought this would help to end the anti-vax movement. I hoped that it would because if it doesn't, the outcome is going to be unthinkable.

    I've now resigned myself to the fact that the horrible outcome is unavoidable. We are going to see a significant resurgence of these diseases in the USA. Kids are be maimed and kids are going to die, and it could all be prevented. 15 years from now, we are going to look back on this whole mess and wonder how we could have let such a thing happen. It makes me very sad.

    04.08.09 - 05:45 AM
  • 456. Glyn said:

    re GreenWeaver:

    Thanks for that. He may have had the vaccine in the last year or so, I'm not sure (he lives in another city now).

    Knowing my mother (and her change of opinion), she probably hassled him enough that he has done so. Fingers crossed he has from my perspective!

    Thanks again,

    Glyn

    04.08.09 - 05:49 AM
  • 457. Tracy said:

    I can also see the point of both sides. BUT I am worried about the disease becoming vaccine resistant. A child who has only recieved part of their shots picking up measles or whooping cough from a child that hasn't been vaccinated.
    That is the truely scary thing for me. That these other parents will remove that "choice" for me and others.
    I have 5 children and none of whom have had any problems with vaccines. I did consider not vaccinating the baby but I couldn't find any actual evidence that convinced ME that not vaccinating would be more benificial than vaccinating.

    04.08.09 - 05:49 AM
  • 458. Anonymous said:

    I thought the same way till I had a boy. Then it all changed. He has had all his shots up till 12 months then I got scared and stopped. There seems to be too many links between the shots and autism. To be perfectly honest I'm scared and don't know who to trust.

    04.08.09 - 05:51 AM
  • 459. Tierney said:

    What you fail to realize is that no vaccination is 100%. I myself have had 2 boosters for MMR and just recently found out that I have no immunity to either measles or mumps and that in order for me to get immunity I will have to actually be exposed to these diseases.

    I have chosen to selectively vaccinate my children on a delayed schedule. I am very grateful that I live in Canada, a country that will allow me to do so without fear of being "kicked-out" of my ped. practice or shunned by my community.

    While I don't have a problem with vaccinations per se, where my issue lies is with the "One size fits all" schedule. Not every child is the same, not every child's immune response will be the same. If my child were to show horrible side effects from vaccinations, I would be incredibly hesitant to get any more.

    But really, what it boils down to is: If you have kept your child up to date with their vaccinations, then you really have nothing to fear right?
    Oh, and you (as an adult) have been getting your boosters, right? Because even as adults we should all be keeping up to date on ours. ;)

    04.08.09 - 05:51 AM
  • 460. Tierney said:

    One more comment about the 10 month old. That child could have gotten measles from anyone, seeing as how they themselves don't get the vaccination until they are 12-15 months old. It's a risk you take when you travel with a child of that age. Who's to say a vaccinated person with no immunity (like myself) couldn't have contracted measles and passed it along. I would have done everything I could to prevent getting them, but would have anyway and unwillingly passed them along.

    04.08.09 - 05:55 AM
  • 461. Meg said:

    I love how eloquently you worded this post. You were able to state your side without attacking the other side.

    I, personally, immunized my child. I have a fear of crazy, scary diseases and feel protected, knowing my daughter is immunized. But there are many who fear the dangers of vaccines and I think their fear should be treated just as legitimately. Fear is what drives us to make choices in life. I don't fear autism and sensory disorders because they are still abstract to me, but I fear diseases that can kill people. Some people legitimately feel the opposite. I don't think we will ever reach a general consensus when it comes to this issue, but I love to hear the reasoning for both sides.

    04.08.09 - 05:57 AM
  • 462. Kate said:

    HERE HERE Heather!

    I have 2 children, the older who has autism. When my 2nd child was born around the time of #1's diagnosis, I researched vaccinations. The major issue of the vaccines was thimerosol -- a mercury based preservative.

    I phoned the companies who produce the vaccines who informed me that all the regular childhood vaccinations were "live" viruses -- they contained no thimerosol because the thimerosol would destroy the vaccine.

    I elected to vaccinate #2, but I was also a bit taken aback by the schedule. So in a few cases, I broke things up a bit. I would sometimes wait another month to get the next shot.

    My autism affected child is now in Grade 4 and it is standard procedure where I live to vaccinate for Hepatitis. The Hepatitus shot DOES have Thimerosol in it. I did feel somewhat nervous about that but felt that the benefits were still better.

    I even vaccinated for chicken pox (Varivax). I had been vaccinated for everything as a child, but there was nothing for chicken pox and I remember how horribly I suffered from the disease at age 8. I wanted to prevent my kids from that suffering. Several years ago, my younger was very ill for 2 weeks with pnuemonia and the flu. Everyday I was trying to figure out who would watch him because I couldn't stay off work for 2 weeks -- it was musical sitters. The day he was finally better and back at daycare, my older son's teacher tells me some bad news: One of the kids in the class is affected with chicken pox. I told her that he had been vaccinated. He and the only other vaccinated child were the only ones who never got it. THANK GOD -- because I would have had a nervous breakdown dealing with that so soon after my other son's illness.

    However, cost may be a factor too for some parents. I paid $100 for tha vaccination -- at least now it's covered on the regular schedule. All these shots should be free for those who can't afford them, but want them.

    I have NEVER regretted my decision to vaccinate my kids. And for those of you worried about autism -- vaccinations did not cause not son's autism -- he was born that way and I have read several studies which all proved that autism and vaccinations are not linked.

    Parents with autistic children are angry. We want to blame someone or something for it happening. We want answers. But, there are no answers yet. I do not believe that vaccines are the answer to "Why does my child have autism?"

    A small number of children die every year from these "childhood diseases." I could never live with myself if mine did because I chose not to vaccinate.

    04.08.09 - 05:58 AM
  • 463. Mary said:

    I'm actually on the pro-vaccination, but perhaps modified schedul side of it.

    Firstly, there is no REAL scientific proof that vaccinations in their *current* formulation are hazardous. In fact, all the studies I've seen show no connection to autism. The info that tries to connect to autism are personal stories and some writings with pseudo-science or studies that can't be trusted because their method is sooooo flawed.

    As for fevers, and such: Well, that is a known problem with vaccines in some children. My son is a touch sensitive and he had that at the start. But now each time his reaction is less and less. We just try to give him as few vaccines as possible at a time. I've had to come back repeatedly so he could get them all, but it worked out better for him to only deal with one, than say five, at a time.

    I'm also big on, later, seeing if you can get a titer rather than a booster. Because, sometimes, you don't actually NEED a shot even though the schedule says you do. Why use up a vaccine someone else might need?

    04.08.09 - 05:59 AM
  • 464. Wendy said:

    My great-uncle Jim has just been given 6 months to live. His life has been dramatically shortened by childhood Polio - a disease we no longer have to worry about because of vaccinations.

    He won't see his daughter marry, or any of his future grandkids.

    People who willingly let their children be at risk for these things (I sincerely hope they have no plans to ever leave the borders of this country!) and put others at risk?

    You either have to be really stupid, or extremely unaware.

    Now I hear in the media that all this business about autism & vaccinations MIGHT just be a bunch of hooey. Hmmmmm.

    04.08.09 - 05:59 AM
  • 465. Carrie said:

    We have followed the regular vaccination schedule with the exception of MMR. We have delayed it, but not because of supposed link to Autism. I am allergic to the combined shot (or atleast to a perservative in it). My sister is allergic to it and so is my mother. The three of us have been boosted with the combined shot (I needed a booster for college and then again for IVF when It was discovered that I was still not immune to measles and rubella). With both boosters I had to be hospitalized. My sister had her college booster within a month of my horrific reaction. Will we still vaccinate- yes, but with a single dose separated vaccine (with limited perservatives). We have decided to wait until her language skills are strong enough to clearly comminucate feelings of pain and illness. At 2.5 we are almost there. Depending on her reaction we may or may not complete the series. The thought of kicking up anaphalaxis scares me.

    04.08.09 - 05:59 AM
  • 466. Lola said:

    As someone who is a passionate about vaccinations, I am so glad that you have opened discussion about this topic. I have seen babies choke and stop breathing from pertussis (whooping chough), teenagers lose limbs from meningitis and adult women struggle with cervical cancer. I am not old enough to have seen polio and measles first hand, but I can imagine how scary it must have been.

    I see vaccination as one of the most natural things a body can do. With vaccinations we are putting a little bit of disease in the body in order for the body to build up immunity. This is what the body is supposed to do and we know this from the most elementary science class. It works.

    What many people may not know is that there are many different types of vaccines from different manufacturers. Not all DTP, HIB, Flu, etc. vaccines are the same in providing the best protection and the least amount of side effects. Usually, when your physician/hospital purchases vaccines they have chosen to buy them from a specific manufacturer. And once that manufacturer is chosen, the schedule is set and it is often to the exclusion of vaccines from other manufacturers. We are all given the CDC sheets when vaccinations are given, but when are we given the vaccine manufacturer’s product information sheet? Your physician may know what vaccines he/she is giving your child, but does he/she know who made them? Do they know why they should know?

    Also, we talk a lot about the debate about vaccinating our children, but what about ourselves? Teenagers and adults need vaccinations, too. If you have a newborn in the house, has your pediatrician or OB/GYN discussed with you that you can indeed pass pertussis to your child? It happens every day. I can't imagine the feeling of knowing that my child passed what could be a fatal disease to his classmates, but I don't even what to think about if I passed that disease to him.

    04.08.09 - 06:00 AM
  • 467. Ashley said:

    I have to say I agree with you. I never knew anyone against vacinations until I started talking to my (distant) cousin. She was very against it and said stuff about the goverment and such. Didn't make much sense to me. And the fear of hurting other becuase of my choice not to vacinate. Well I can't do that. My childern will be vacinated.

    04.08.09 - 06:06 AM
  • 468. Maggie said:

    I wholeheartedly agree with you as well. I actually get angry when people don't vaccinate because they are risking the health of many others, not just their own children, such as babies too young to be vaccinated and people with compromised immune systems. People who would be at risk for complications if they contract an infectious disease. I tell parents I meet who don't want to vaccinate to at least get the polio vaccine, if nothing else. People who get immunized in countries where the live vaccine is still used can shed the virus and unvaccinated people will be at risk.

    04.08.09 - 06:07 AM
  • 469. Cee said:

    I don't have kids, but I like to watch your Momversation episodes (oh how I loathe that word and all cutesy mom-related blogging vernacular) because I like to see what outfits you pick out and your hair.

    cheers!

    04.08.09 - 06:08 AM
  • 470. ang said:

    I too heard the story on This American Life on NPR. I thought both sides had an equal voice, but what really hit me was the family that had to be quarantined and miss work and that was that. A choice that was forced on them for just being in the right place at the wrong time!

    I also thought that the ending phrase (that someone already pointed out) about neither party changing their views after hearing about the other side was interesting.

    We're currently trying to get pregnant and of all the things we've talked about, we realized we had never talked about vaccination. After this story was over, we both turned to each other and had this look on our faces and I said "I know I sound judgmental and this doesn't sound like a question, but I'm vaccinating any baby that comes out of me, you're cool with that, right?" and w/o missing a beat, he said "damn straight". Then we both kind of sighed in relief because we both felt THAT strongly about it that we already had visions of us "duking it out" if we disagreed.

    Sure, as a "worst case scenario" girl, the stories of autism freak me out. I don't think I'd ever double up on the vaccines. As so many already pointed out - there are risks, but there are risks with MANY things.

    I usually feel that these things are individual choices (as you said, breastfeeding or formula feeding, and no one knows the circumstances, i.e. maybe the baby never latched on so it HAS to be formula fed) but I feel vaccinations ARE about the greater good.

    Thank you for your post!!

    04.08.09 - 06:09 AM
  • 471. Karl said:

    I have to say that this argument puzzles and astonishes me. I honestly don't see why there is any room for argument.

    No vaccination = dead children. We have thousands of years worth of dead children to prove this link.

    Vaccination != autism. There is absolutely no credible (emphasis on credible) link between the two. One might as well claim that driving children around in SUV's causes autism; after all, SUV popularity rose about the same time as the autism rates. There are zillions of possible environmental causes, even if you leave aside under-diagnosing which is the mostly likely "cause" of the increased rates. Linking vaccination to autism on anecdotal evidence is statistical nonsense, and if it leads to dead children, it's criminal.

    04.08.09 - 06:10 AM
  • 472. One Sided Momma said:

    Great post, thanks for touching on such a hot topic.

    I feel the answer to parental fears of autism is not in avoiding vaccincations altogether. I can understand their fears, as a mother of a 2.5 year old and a new baby, believe me, I've had them myself. I feel that we should spend more time and more money on researching a gene that predisposes babies who may be born with low immune systems, thus putting them at more risk for live vaccinations than other "healthier" babies. As I understand it, there has been some research done that indicates this could be a reason that some babies react so poorly to the now popular "doubling up" of vaccinations. If we had a test that determined which babies carried this gene, then THOSE babies' parents could then decide on the "alternative" schedule for vaccinations.

    Obviously, we are far from a perfect answer to this problem but as more children are being labeled with autism and the spectrum widens, parents nationwide should be concerned.

    Thanks again, Heather for bringing this to our attention as it should stay in the forefront for research.

    04.08.09 - 06:13 AM
  • 473. Amy said:

    I want to comment on what JAS (comment #169) asked: should parents whose children are unfortunate enough to experience vaccination side effects be helped with the costs this burden places on them? Obviously.

    There is so much talk here about how choosing not to vaccinate is a first world luxury. This is true. As a Canadian though, I believe that Americans are living without the first world benefits of universal health care necessary to make the decision. I suspect that parents contemplating not vaccinating ie. "I'd rather sit in the ER with a sick child than deal with autism forever" are making a somewhat rational economic decision. Perhaps unconsciously (or consciously) these parents know that their 'health insurance' (those were disdainful quotation marks) will cover chicken pox and measles more fully and easily than the expensive and ongoing IBI treatments for autism.

    As a not-yet-parent I will be more than willing to assume any and all possible side effects of vaccinating my children because in doing my part for greater societal protection my society values my contribution enough to 'pay it back' in the form of universal health care.

    In the US parents of children with autism face so many challenges; marital strain, financial strain, etc, etc, etc. It's wrong, of course, but I can understand how a parent can still be wary despite there being no link between autism and vaccines because the potential burden is so great. And, of course, having a child with autism certainly isn't the worst thing but I can say honestly that I would prefer not to have that challenge in my life. For parents who will have to face such a diagnosis with few resources, well, I can't even imagine.

    04.08.09 - 06:17 AM
  • 474. Maggie said:

    I know someone whose Mom died of measles. I don't know what the backstory was, but basically, to hear the heartache in this woman's voice when she says that she doesn't understand why people don't vaccinate is enough to give anyone pause.

    Meanwhile, I understand that many people feel that same heartache about the autism connection. Yet I know some Mothers whose children are on the autistic scale who do not believe it was anything to do with vaccines.

    I think that essentially, more research needs to be done, because what is out there now (vs 5 years ago) is saying more and more that there is no link. Mostly, that the vaccine may have REVEALED the autism earlier, but not that it CAUSED it.

    04.08.09 - 06:19 AM
  • 475. Anonymous said:

    You have daughter(s). Do you have thoughts about the Gardisil vaccine that guards against cervical cancer? I know you're not there yet, but will you vaccinate your girls?

    04.08.09 - 06:19 AM
  • 476. Lindy said:

    Bravo, Dooce. Now when I feel like I'm getting frustrated with friends who are being pushy about the no-vaccine thing (I'm due with my first kid the same week you are), I will have this post, which I plan to print out and read through. It's articulate, measured, thoughtful, and accurate. Thanks.

    04.08.09 - 06:19 AM
  • 477. Mel said:

    I vaccinated all four of my children following the CDC recommended schedule. I would do it again.

    I can observe, though, that the number of vaccines has increased dramatically over the eleven year span between my oldest and youngest children. In the first two years of his life, my oldest son had 12 shots. In the same time frame, my youngest had close to 20. It seemed overwhelming to me, even though I had been through the process three times before. Additionally, "recommended" vaccines keep increasing. Our pediatrician recently recommended my 12-year-old daughter begin the 3-shot HPV series. I also was required to have my middle children given boosters for the chicken pox vaccine before school started. So, I can see how parents look at that LONG list of vaccines and get nervous.

    That said, vaccination is, in my opinion, the single greatest public health victory. Ever.

    04.08.09 - 06:23 AM
  • 478. helmetnona said:

    I'm an epidemiologist, not yet a mother. What you're talking about is herd immunity--protect your child, protect all children. Vaccinations are the smart way to go for everyone's interest.

    04.08.09 - 06:23 AM
  • 479. Anonymous said:

    I have made sure my kids got every single vaccine they were suppose to get. My best friend has not, and our children play together frequently. In the back of my mind, I do worry about her kids getting sick and jeopardizing my kid's health. It is really hard to support and totally disagree with someone you care about. Great post - great explanation of exactly how I feel.

    04.08.09 - 06:27 AM
  • 480. J said:

    well put.

    04.08.09 - 06:27 AM
  • 481. Nikki said:

    Right on Sista! I am 6 months pregnant with my first child and my husband and I have already made the decision to have our infant vaccinated. I work in a lab that develops vaccines, so I know how important it is to prevent outbreaks like that Measles case. The idea of hear immunity does not work if everyone forgoes vaccinating their child!

    Thanks for opening this topic up for discussion on your blog. I think more mothers need to be properly educated by someone other than the crazed media.

    04.08.09 - 06:31 AM
  • 482. Anonymous said:

    Perhaps already said, so forgive if this is the case.

    In response to "Kay" (#143 in the comments) who said: "...he deserves to be able to interact with others his age, no matter how limited his abilities may be. And I refuse to take that small joy away from him because of the risk it might pose to him, or others."

    Don't you believe that's a little selfish in light of the fact that, if ill with an infectious disease due to non-vaccination, MY child (or anothers) may become sick, disabled or die? Please don't misunderstand, I'm very empathic to your son's health/disability but not when placing your child's "joy" above the HEALTH of others.

    I think the bigger picture & question is, "Where is the line in the sand: does one child's health supercede the well-being of the "community?"

    04.08.09 - 06:33 AM
  • 483. Wendy Martin said:

    I clap my hands to you. Exactly!! My mother-in-law lost a sister to polio. These diseases are real and deadly. That's why vaccine's were made. I asked my very experienced, awesome pediatrician about autism and vaccines (I have a half-brother who is autistic). She said there is no conclusive evidence, that the study was put together by a group of lawyers who had special interest in showing an association between vaccinations and autism.
    Great post!

    04.08.09 - 06:34 AM
  • 484. Becky said:

    I. Cannot. Agree. With. You. More. Like Asha said, there is no scientific evidence. I have yet to be persuaded NOT to vaccinate. I have discussed this with our doctor in depth and I feel that the risks of contracting (and maybe SPREADING) these diseases FAR outweigh the potential risks.

    That said, there are reasons to do a delayed schedule - these vaccinations are for healthy children. If your child is sick I can understand delaying. But never NOT doing them.

    04.08.09 - 06:35 AM
  • 485. Jennifer McGuire said:

    Thank you for writing this. Failure to immunize is one of my hot-button topics. You have a lot of courage to open up this discussion -- not that I'm surprised!

    04.08.09 - 06:37 AM
  • 486. Jennifer said:

    I'm sure a lot of the comments have been strong, to say the least. (I haven't read any)

    I agree with you--your stand is the same as mine. I believe modern vaccinations are a miracle of medicine, I believe they should be administered to all children (who can tolerate them) and I believe it is dangerously naive to pretend that you are protected if "everyone else's child" gets them. A look back at history, and witnessing the horror these illnesses can bring should make you terrified of the alternative.

    04.08.09 - 06:37 AM
  • 487. The Domestic Goddess said:

    Please, for the love of all that is good and holy, vaccinate your kids! I had an UNVACCINATED infant who ended up in the hospital and was almost killed because he was exposed to something that can be easily prevented from a vaccination. I know this is something that remain very controversial. Especially since the first words out of everyone's mouths when I tell them my kids are both autistic are, "Are they vaccinated?" And my answer is, "YES! Because I didn't want them to die from some horrible disease!"

    Look, my life isn't easy. But it's mine. My kids are happy and loved. They don't have leukemia. They have autism. I really don't' think our life is bad. Why does everyone think my life is so horrible?

    Don't get me started on my friends who don't vaccinate and have autistic children. Why is it no one ever talks about that?

    04.08.09 - 06:39 AM
  • 488. Miss Peas said:

    Word, word, word, Heather.

    If we had to see the ravages of Polio every day, I highly doubt anyone wouldn't rush to get their children vaccinated.

    The fact that we can even HAVE this conversation is a testament to how well vaccines work.

    It absolutely bananas that people like Jenny McCarthy are allowed a platform to spew some of the most misinformed, alarmist information out there.
    Why is anyone even listening to her? She's not a medical professional! And yet she's all over television basically stating she'd rather have our children die from horrible preventable diseases than develop autism.

    Are people serious?
    They'd honestly risk their child's life for quack science?

    This anti-vaccination lunacy has gone on long enough.

    04.08.09 - 06:39 AM
  • 489. chiquita said:

    I understand the desire for parents of autistic children to have a cause, a reason, for what has happened to them. But as was mentioned above, the science doesn't hold water. There are plenty of exposures to stuff (technical term) totally unrelated to vaccines. Also, the breastfed babies don't need vaccinations doesn't hold up unless you are going to keep them isolated (which isn't good for a growing baby.) I did a slightly modified schedule and feel fine about it.

    04.08.09 - 06:39 AM
  • 490. aggiegrad96 said:

    That was very well written. I am with you - while I understand why some parents choose to not vaccinate, I choose to vaccinate for some of the same reasons you mentioned. I'm a member of a great mom's discussion board called idob.org and this topic comes up for debate over and over again. Before joining that board, I had no idea that people ever chose not to immunize - it was quite an eye opening thing for me.

    04.08.09 - 06:40 AM
  • 491. Kim said:

    I'll share my story...I was anxious about vaccines, I think most moms are but our first had all of them and did just fine - didn't even have a fever or crankiness. However, our second had quite a bad recation with his four month shots (I think he had the same with his two month shots but because he was so little we just chalked up his screaming to being a newborn). After his four month shots he screamed, and I mean screamed, not just cried for hours, he refused to eat, and he slept for 12 hours staight, after which I had a hard time waking him up. To put it mildly, it was terrifying. After doing a bit of research we concluded that he had a somewhat typical recation to the pertussis vaccine. While this was very concerning, we weren't sure what to do since I didn't want to go without vaccinating. So...we chose to break them up. Our second received every vaccine one at a time and it was perfect! It meant more trips to the doctor's office but he had zero reactions. This has lead me to believe (based on other articles that I have read as well as our experience) that it's not the vaccines but the amount that they receive all at once. I think some kids just can't handle so much at once.

    Our second, now five, just had his last DPT vaccine and his arm blew up like a balloon! (He's never had a problem with the others) It could have been dangerous...our doctor's initial recation was to take him to the ER but since he was not running a fever and did not seem to be in pain we just watched it for a few days and iced his arm. Doctor thinks some of the pertussis vaccine got under his skin vs. into the arm and caused the reaction. A week later and he's fine.

    So...we've had some issues from vaccines but that would not lead me to pass on them. At the end of the day, vaccines are a good thing. I do, however, have strong feelings about giving a two month old seven vaccines at once. If we had a third, I would space out the shots again...I really do think that makes a huge difference for some children.

    Thanks for sharing both sides of the story here...good stuff!

    04.08.09 - 06:41 AM
  • 492. sheryl said:

    I have asperger syndrome. My brother has asperger syndrome. One of his two sons has asperger syndrome. Our mother is schizophrenic. Our mother's mother was schizophrenic. My sister is neither schizophrenic nor has asperger syndrome. None of her children show signs of asperger syndrome nor schizophrenia.

    We were all vaccinated. I have read a lot of material about vaccinations over the past 8 years. I have read again and again whatever research I have been able to get my hands on re the relationship of asperger syndrome/ autism spectrum and schizophrenia.

    I have been very involved with several autism support groups over the past 3 years.

    Here's what I think: We'll never really know - in our current lifetimes. We don't have control. People are born with certain traits and genetic predispositions, and it's not currently (nor will it be anytime soon) possible to know what kicks off certain neurological and developmental "tracks".

    I think the "we don't have control" part is the hard part. Others have said here that they feel helpless, or at least that's what I hear. Others have said that when one is a parent one doesn't want to accept/believe that one's biology is partly responsible for any damage to one's child or that child's potential.

    The same underlying force that drives one to reproduce is responsible for defining specific attributes of one's offspring, including their predisposition to any combination of potential issues or benefits.

    Even if one knew for certain that vaccinations or no vaccinations would lead to a specific outcome for our own children, the idea that we know what we're doing is pretty much completely a moot point.

    I wouldn't want to be part of a super-illness or epidemic. The science is pretty clear on what can happen if a disease is not currently likely to spread *but does spread because not enough people have resistance to it*.

    I get where parents who have autistic kids are coming from. I can also see that dead kids is a worse scenario than autistic kids.

    04.08.09 - 06:42 AM
  • 493. Katriina said:

    I completely agree with you. I immunized my son. I did break up a few of the shots so there weren't so many at a time, but I would never risk my child's life or someone else's by not vaccinating.

    04.08.09 - 06:42 AM
  • 494. manicmama said:

    I was in a mom's group where I was the "minority" for vaccinating my children. I am really happy to see this topic brought up without flaming. My kids have an amazing Pediatrician that I trust more than I trust myself sometimes. She loves my children, you can see it in her eyes when she holds them. I do not believe she would recommend treating my kids in a way that may harm them.

    04.08.09 - 06:44 AM
  • 495. Nathan Pralle said:

    I sincerely urge parents out there who want to have a say in how vaccinations are applied to their childrento keep searching until they find a physician who is good enough to sit down, listen to any concerns, and explain everything VERY thoroughly like the doctor we have. I always thought she was a good pediatrician, but my heart grew 3x larger when we asked about our son's vaccs and she didn't once make us feel ignorant or stupid for questioning them. She took the time to explain everything, back up her statements with real research, and to formulate a safe and steady vacc plan that will get our son full immunized, not on the "recommended" schedule, but on a modified schedule due to his multiple allergies and sensitivities.

    If you do not have a peds doc willing to do the above, find another. It's been worth 10 times the amount she gets paid for the peace of mind and assurance every time we go and take our son in to be seen.

    04.08.09 - 06:45 AM
  • 496. Randall said:

    I couldn't agree with you more. Especially the part about how not vaccinating is a first world luxury. I would bet if any mother had seen the effects of polio or the sounds of whopping cough as a child she would have a much different outlook on the benefits of these vaccines.

    04.08.09 - 06:46 AM
  • 497. Mrs. Q. said:

    I do believe that doctors and parents should be able to work together to plan a vaccination schedule that makes sense for their family-- breaking up vaccinations to allow a baby's immune system to better tolerate doses; exploring alternatives to common allergens; discussing options if there is a family medical history that suggest autism or other disorders.

    At the same time, I strongly believe that people who don't choose to immunize their children against LIFE-THREATENING diseases do so at the expense of ALL our children's health. It makes me angry.

    If a parent chooses to forgo the flu, varicella or HPV vaccine, I'm OK with that, since thy are questionably-effective or not tested on the long-term; however, if something can KILL children and it easily-preventable, can we, as parents, just accept that there is a responsibility for the greater good?

    04.08.09 - 06:49 AM
  • 498. c8smomsam said:

    Thanks Heather! What a great subject to get a lot of feedback on. I agree with you on this one too. My reasoning is how horrible I would feel if my child died from one of these easily preventable diseases. How could I live with the guilt that I could have prevented the outcome? Or...someone elses child getting fatally ill from something my child gave them. I think that vaccinating in some form is best, it's all about having a healthy kiddo!

    04.08.09 - 06:50 AM
  • 499. Anonymous said:

    Heather, Once again I commend you for basic common sense. Too many people drink the Kool-aid fed by Oprah and others concerning vaccinating small children. As a pre-school teacher, I appreciate when parents study all sides and make the decision that works for them....

    04.08.09 - 06:51 AM
  • 500. erika said:

    I have three children, the first had her first year of vaccinations and no more, the second had one series, and the third has not been vaccinated at all. I am not going to enter the debate of what you should or shouldn't do because I am not here to try to change anyone's mind. However, I can say I don't understand the complete trust so many place in pharmaceutical companies and in the advice of doctors without doing their own research. I have seen firsthand how money talks in this country, and I think everyone should pay more attention to whose money is going where and realize that pharmaceutical companies and most hospitals are corporations, and not make decisions based solely on the advice of corporations who are profiting from your decision to vaccinate. So whether you choose to vaccinate or not to, please educate yourself and make an informed decision.

    04.08.09 - 06:52 AM
  • 501. Rachel B. said:

    I agree with you here! I have a three month old am vaccinating on a modified schedule. I do not agree with some of the agressive vaccination schedules that some doctor's do, but I do understand the importance of protecting my little girl! One note about the case study you talked about...if you are vaccinating on a modified schedule, then you should consider postponing leaving the country with your little one until ALL applicable vaccinations have been received. Great post, very well written!

    04.08.09 - 06:52 AM
  • 502. Anonymous said:

    My pediatrician grew up and studied medicine in what was East Germany.

    As an intern, she treated wardsful of children suffering from diseases that we here in the G8 nations are now arguing about vaccinating our children against: measles, mumps, rubella, polio, etc., etc., etc.

    She watched little kids struggle and die -- long, agonising, painful deaths -- from diseases that we now know how to avoid, and seriously questioned her choice of vocation after she spent days trying to save her tiny patients to no avail. (Thank heavens she stayed with it -- she's awesome, and we're happy to have found her.)

    She watched parents, prostrate with grief and guilt, struggle with depression, alcohol abuse, and suicide. (leaving the surviving parent to raise the surviving children alone) - and sometimes the surviving families disintegrate because of the guilt and blame and grief between the parents. Everybody loses.

    She's walked the walk, so I have no choice but to listen when she talks the talk.

    And HPV vaccine? You can talk to me about the validity of HPV vaccines when you've been treated for HPV and cancer, as my sister and I, and a number of my close friends have been. That's fine -- you wanna believe your daughter will be celibate until her wedding night? (don't forget to invite the Easter Bunny and the Tooth Fairy to her wedding.) What if she's raped? What if her husband brings it to her -- either from a prior relationship, or if he strays? What if he is out of the picture (divorce or she ends up a widow) -- and she marries again? You don't have to be a slut to end up with HPV...and the treatment isn't any fun. Happily, my sis and I are both alive and healthy...and we know we're the lucky ones. The alternative is painful treament, and if they can't fix it, results in another long, painful death that's as hard on the family as it is the victim...and you want to inflict that on your daughter? Are you going to raise her children for her?

    I appreciate the fact that there has been primarily intelligent, grownup discourse on this topic...but please, please...get your kids vaccinated, whether it's on the recommended or an altered schedule...but do it.

    04.08.09 - 06:52 AM
  • 503. Meredith said:

    This was an excellently written and eloquent post. I agree with you when you say that parents who choose not to vaccinate are relying on those who do to keep their kids from being exposed to serious illness. For our family, that wasn't enough of a guarantee and we chose to vaccinate.

    04.08.09 - 06:53 AM
  • 504. Elizabeth at Type A Mommy said:

    Wow, Heather, I'm impressed. I knew you were well-spoken and could articulate a point well, but I'm floored by how spot on you were on this post. Not only do you communicate your point extremely well, but it's exactly my feeling on the vaccine debate. I understand that it's a very personal decision for parents to make, but I think many parents don't realize how their decision to not vaccinate can impact other families. This was a great post to make people think - and kudos to you for sounding so non-judgmental. That's really tough to do, regardless of what side you're on in this very heated debate.

    ** Applause **

    04.08.09 - 06:56 AM
  • 505. Heather said:

    Heather: Thank you for writing such a thoughful and wise piece and allowing all these women to chime in with their experiences, opinions and the like. What an amazing group of women you have reading your words, thank you for opening this up to comments.

    It is comforting to see that so many of us think alike and are tolerant and understandingand are educating ourselves on this topic. I preferred to follow my ped's advice and vaccinate on schedule. Her office will not take a patient if you do not follow their schedule, but they will also consider the right time to vaccinate ie: not when a child is ill.

    I am now pregnant with #2 and will follow the same as I did with #1 because we want to keep all children healthy. If it means we vaccinate to protect against that 5% that does not, then we will do our part.

    You're a wise women and brave to open up this topic. THANK YOU!

    PS: Saw you at B&N in NYC last month and really enjoyed hearing you read from your book! The curled hair and red lipstick only added to the excitement of seeing you in person!!!

    04.08.09 - 06:59 AM
  • 506. Martha said:

    In some situations vaccinating a child are a "damn if you do and damn if you don't". but you don't know till it's done.
    Family history,the child's health (recent/ongoing cough,cold,flu,virus symtpoms,irritability,sleeplessness etc have to be taken into consideration-even "milestones" should be looked at.

    There should be a VACCINATION CHECKLIST (like all OR's should have pre-op checklists)

    I think all children should be vaccinated, if healthy.
    If there is a family hx- be judicious- try a month later in starting the series, smaller doses to start, then building up.
    New parents should STOP taking your newborns to MALLS to shop! While natural immunity is great, again be judicious with a newborn.
    (Just so you know, dogs can't be out in "general population" until after their second needle-we protect them!
    I also have had a pup with "puppy strangles" a reaction to the vaccinations-so it does happen)

    I am 53 years old and my twin brother died at age 7 months
    in a large city in Canada-in a well known pediatric hospital-& our Doctor was Chief of Infectious diseases!
    -no one knew that there would be complications. My twin was not quite up to his milestones (almost- but not quite) but we both received the series of injections. He died after the 3rd needle. This was 1/2 a century ago-and i don't know if things have changed that much.
    It's tough when you worry about these needles BUT it's TOUGHER if a child dies of a disease for which there is a vaccination.

    04.08.09 - 07:02 AM
  • 507. Ms. Single Mama said:

    Hi Heather:

    I actually stalked you on the street during SXSW - you were waiting to eat dinner and I ran up to you like a maniac. I can attest that you definitely looked tired as hell (yet still totally lovely and pregnant).

    So... one thing - my father, a DO practicing in the 70's, 80's and 90's before he died of cancer in 1997 didn't have a one of us immunized (there are six). And it had nothing to do with a government conspiracy.

    He believed strongly that immunizing children before the age of five could actually weaken their immune system. There are some vaccines today - like the one for Measles that he would clearly support giving early on but vaccines for HPV and such... ridiculous.

    This is a great post. I'm glad you're taking on this topic because too many of us ignore it. We, as moms, should be talking and discussing these issues without passing judgment.

    And - for the record - I met in the middle of my father's beliefs and waited until my son was 18 months old for his first immunizations (aside from Measles). He made it until then without one fever, one cold or one vomity sickness.

    04.08.09 - 07:03 AM
  • 508. Loretta said:

    I really like your point about those who don't vaccinate counting on others to vaccinate. The funny thing to me is that autism always emerges around the time kids get vaccinated because that's when their social skills start too. It's a weak correlation and has no scientific basis. Great post!

    04.08.09 - 07:04 AM
  • 509. Susan Raihala said:

    Thank you SO MUCH for making such a clear statement of my own opinion on this issue. A recent outbreak of whooping cough in our area put infants and those with compromised immune systems at risk. Immunized children acted as symptomless carriers for the disease, which allowed it to spread very quickly through the school system and out into the wider community.

    My second child has autism. His symptoms, had we known what to look for, began as early as 3 months of age...before the aggressive vaccine schedule kicks in. Both my children are fully vaccinated, and both are extremely healthy.

    If a family's decision not to vaccinate only affected that family, then, yes, I'd say it's a "personal choice." But that decision can result in the death of their own children and the death of other innocent bystanders.

    04.08.09 - 07:06 AM
  • 510. webgrrlie said:

    i just have a word or two to say that someone has probably already said, BUT... i do not have children, and i'm not planning on them. however, if i were to have children, i WOULD have them vaccinated. i'm 40 y.o., i was vaccinated, and, hey, i'm still alive, and actually, no side-effects.

    for those of you who choose NOT to vaccinate your kids, i would say to you, "please, contain your entire home in a bio-sphere. grow your own food, mill your own textiles, make your own clothes. home-school your children. do not take them out of the bio-sphere, EVER. find another home-schooled kid to marry them off to."

    never, EVER do i want to be in contact with you or your family, because by choosing not to vaccinate YOUR kids, you've made that decision for the ENTIRE world, and that's just selfish and stupid.

    04.08.09 - 07:11 AM
  • 511. stacey said:

    i'm 33 and never had chicken pox as a kid. i caught it at 28 when i was barely a few weeks pregnant with my second son. the effects of chicken pox on a developing fetus can be devastating. my husband and i had to consider terminating the pregnancy. luckily for all of us, my case was very mild and the timing was such that the baby's risk was minimal. he's now an extremely healthy 5 year old. did i vaccinate my kids? damn right.

    04.08.09 - 07:12 AM
  • 512. Meg said:

    Well said. Fully agreed on every single point. I know so many parents who choose NOT to vaccinate their children that I was terrified to bring my infant daughter around their older toddlers (who attend schools and daycares) until she was fully vaccinated herself. And that's a darn shame.

    04.08.09 - 07:16 AM
  • 513. jennie said:

    I am a mother who has choosen not to vaccinate her child. I have a boy and the studies show that boys are more apt to get autism than girls. That was my first concern. As I did more research when I was pregnant I noticed how aggressive the vaccine schedule was and how ONE SIZE FITS ALL. I do not agree with that. My son was born at week 39, weighing only 5lbs 12oz. I am tiny and he did not have much room to get any bigger without me popping. So how can ONE SIZE FIT ALL. I constanly worry about him in public catching something from another child. I am willing to take that worry because I feel good about my decision not to vaccinate. I am not saying I will never vaccinate I am just not choosing to do so at this time in his life. He also stays at home with his grandmother while my husband and I work outside the home.

    04.08.09 - 07:19 AM
  • 514. Jessi said:

    I completely agree. I feel that the real reason we have vaccines is to protect the "herd" not just to protect individuals.

    I think a lot about my great-grandmother who lost two children to polio and had 4 children who were forever affected by it. She saw the advent of the polio vaccine and she saw the disease fade into oblivion. I wonder what she would say about parents choosing not to vaccinate against it. I can't imagine it would be good.

    I also met a woman a few years back whose daughter was born with a serious and lifethreatening heart complication. At the time that I knew her, the little girl was five years old and had never been to a birthday party, a Chuck-e-cheese, an amusement park, a children's museum or a story time at the library. Why? Because it was literally life-threatening for her to be exposed to chicken pox, measles or any other "childhood illness." In the past few years, many parents in their community had chosen to forego vaccinations and this poor child was nearly housebound. When I met them, the mother was about to start homeschooling. She was pretty adamant about the necessity of vaccinations, too.

    I understand that we don't really know what causes autism (although I tend to believe that it is not vaccines) and that there are sometimes religious or other issues that influence parents, but it seems to me that it is playing with fire to choose possible death from polio or another disease over possible autism.

    All this being said, I do believe that parents should have the choice. But I also believe that we are very, very close to seeing huge resurgences of these diseases as more and more parents rely on a herd immunity that no longer exists.

    04.08.09 - 07:19 AM
  • 515. Susan S. said:

    Heather,

    You continually open my views on what it means to be a parent and challenge my beliefs on right vs. wrong. I appreciate these posts and believe that they will, hopefully someday, make me a better, well-informed mother who is able to compare such decisions.

    I'll let it be known, that I have always thought children should be vaccinated. Not taking advantage of modern medicine and technology can often cause more problems in the future. Understanding how the body functions, how children react to vaccinations, and generally furthering the medical knowledge base could lead to the cures for autism, cancer, and other diseases in the future! There is always an exception, however, and parents should be able to work with their doctors in these special cases.

    04.08.09 - 07:22 AM
  • 516. Anne Lindenfeld said:

    Concerns over the link to the MMR vaccination and the effect of a rising body load of infant vaccines was something I wrestled with when my son was an infant 12 years ago. Ours is a solidly autism spectrum family, so I was reading everything I could on the subject. (One nephew with Aspergers, one with severe autism, a borderline Aspergers father, etc.) I found a developmental pediatrician who didn't look at me like I had an extra head when I questioned him on vaccines' possible link to autism, and he agreed that we should "unbundle" the vaccines given to my son. This doctor believed that by giving the infant immune system a lengthier time to adjust to the vaccines, we might be able to avoid overwhelming my baby's system and thereby reduce any chance of autism onset. In other words, rather than giving him the MMR and DPT, he had individual vaccines (eg one for measles, one for mumps, one for diptheria, etc.) We spaced out the vaccines to give his immune system a chance to adjust to the vaccines. We also made sure that he only got jabs that were thimersol-free.

    I believe that this was the right approach to take for our family. We both protected our child and the public from avoidable disease and we gave our son (what I believe) was a good shot at not triggering an autistic response. In the end, he had significant developmental delays, but he did not exhibit autistic behavior.

    According to our doc at the time, the only reason we bundle vaccinations and adhere to the current aggressive vaccinating schedule for infants is because the CDC doesn't trust parents to come back over and over to get separate vaccinations. In many cases the CDC is right. However, the CDC also directs docs to give infants adult dose vaccinations, which may also contribute to detrimental immune responses from some infants. At least that is what some scientists believe, as do I. At the end of the day, I believe that we could all do with a more balanced approach from the CDC...and better oversight of the pharmaceutical industry. For instance, making sure they stop selling flu vaccines containing thimersol to school systems -- still a regular practice.

    04.08.09 - 07:22 AM
  • 517. Whitney said:

    Heather,

    As a soon-to-be-married woman, I've thought occasionally about children, though I still consider myself quite naive when it comes to subjects like vaccinations. I've heard so many little tidbits of information here and there about the likelihood of vaccinations leading to autism in young children. With so many moms voicing their opinions about this, what I took away from it was that if we refused to vaccinate, it would send a clear message that moms didn't want to inject their children with unsafe vaccinations. Maybe then would more money be invested in medical research that would result in safer vaccinations. Those little tidbits left me on the fence with this issue.

    That being said, reading your post today completely opened my eyes. Like I said, I don't have children, in fact I'm many years away from having children so my knowledge is limited because I've yet to research this, but I never thought about the innocent babies that so frequently come in contact with children who aren't vaccinated. It's scary, actually, to think that another parent's decision to not vaccinate could actually lead to the death of my baby one day. It's really sad.

    Thanks for opening my eyes about this one. If you were looking to change even one mind about this topic, you've done it.

    04.08.09 - 07:22 AM
  • 518. Lou said:

    Heather - saw you on Oprah and you rocked, btw.

    As for this topic - broken record here, but again - ROCKING IT. I couldn't have put my own feelings on the subject any better. Yes. Yes. Yes.

    Let me step out a little further and with no intention of offending anyone, just be flat honest ... I really have a hard time when the few parents (moms) I know that are very anti-immunizations get on their soap boxes and go off on their tangents calling educated, well studied, highly inteligent scientists all kinds of names and completely disregarding their YEARS of schooling, research and work ... and these moms know nothing about science, medicine, scientific method, medical research, etc. AND have no formal education themselves. Sorry, but what another anit-immunization mom told you in the checkout line is not science!!! I know not all anti-immunization minded parents are like I've described ... but I know many that are. JMHO

    04.08.09 - 07:24 AM
  • 519. Plano Mom said:

    I echo the comments commending you for a well written discussion on a very complex issue. I want to add another perspective, one from a child who started a rubella epidemic in her town. When I was a child, the rubella vaccine was still very new and had not been mandated yet. I first started showing rubella symptoms while my entire grade was in music class. By the time my illness was discovered and I was isolated, several children had already been exposed. My school was one of the first to receive the new rubella vaccine. 40 years later I still remember it because I was then known as the girl who started the epidemic. I have given every vaccine available to both of my children, if only to spare them the social horror...

    04.08.09 - 07:24 AM
  • 520. Georgia Ketchmark said:

    I haven't viewed the video, but I will tell you my tale.

    Firstly, I believe in vaccination. I was fully vaccinated as a child and was never ill with any childhood disease save chickenpox which I recovered nicely from. At ten years of age, I got a tetanus shot which caused extreme pain in my left arm, shoulder, upper torso, neck and head. My parents thought it was normal and that I was exaggerating the pain.

    At sixteen I cut my arm pretty badly and received another tetanus shot. The same symptoms returned only worse and my throat swelled such that I couldn't breathe without turning my head completely to the right. Once again, my parents felt I was exaggerating my symptoms and allowed me to just get through it. I can't describe the pain in my head, neck, torso and hip - I felt blinded, sick, swollen, like half a person, literally.

    Upon the second month anniversary of my first son's birth, I strolled into the pediatrician's office ready to submit my infant for the first round of protection against disease. Among the immunizations he received were live oral polio and DPT. Of course I expected the screams, the tears, the discomfort and my arsenal of baby tylenol, adult tylenol, Pedialyte were all at home waiting.

    Sure enough, he clenched his hands (and feet!), flexed his arms and legs in and screamed for all he was worth.

    He maintained that position for two days straight and while awake the following three. His eyes clenched shut and didn't open for days. He spiked a fever, vomited regularly, etcetera, etcetera. You've heard it all before, I'm sure.

    We went to the ER when his fever hit 105. We were sent home with a pat on the back for the noob parents and reassurance that he'd be right as rain.

    Slowly, he seemed to recover but was never quite the same. He developed a bad cold which he had to take antibiotics for.

    We went for his second shots and had a similar but worse experience. Once again, we were told to go home, give him cold water baths for the fever, pedialyte, etcetera. The following morning, he was delirious in fever. I decided right then that I would not get him more shots until we found out what went wrong.

    Problem is this ... no doctor wants to help me find what went wrong. My son NEVER received the MMR vaccine, so I won't claim that the measles vaccine causes autism, but SOMETHING hit my son.

    I have video of him making eye contact as a baby, giggling at me, reaching out to touch my face; then post-vaccine the vacant stare, the constant gutteral hum, lack of returned affection.

    I want to be perfectly clear: I want my son vaccinated SAFELY. I have repeatedly told my story to any doctor or health care professional who would listen and asked them for a reference to any immunologist or other doctor who would help me find out what went wrong so I don't endanger my son with further vaccinations. The response I've gotten is either they think I'm "one of those anti-vaccine kooks" or that I should just let them inject him and if he has a problem, bring him to the hospital (like that did him any good the first time around).

    It has been speculated by the local health sciences university that me and my son both had a diphtheria reaction and should not get regular tetanus shots (which contain the diphtheria toxoid) ... and the last Tetanus toxoid shot I received (please don't ask what I had to go through to get it) did not give me any reaction.

    So ... nobody knows in our sprawling metropolis complete with medical school how to find out what my son reacted to, nor do they care to help me find out how to.

    I suppose I can travel the world to find out - and I likely will travel to find out ... when I have saved up enough money and we don't have to hospitalize him again for another breakdown.

    I did not vaccinate my daughter but she has not traveled outside the US - we are set to start her schedule. My third son has a different father and is fully vaccinated. Neither of my younger two has any developmental, brain or other disorder.

    So, world: I WANT MY CHILDREN TO BE SAFELY VACCINATED. I WILL PAY EXTRA MONEY TO GET THEM SAFELY VACCINATED AND I WILL NOT DO SO UNTIL IT IS DETERMINED SCIENTIFICALLY WHAT OUR REACTION TRIGGER IS.

    If anyone in the Pacific Northwest reads this and can refer me to someone within reasonable proximity (I'll go as far as Southern California, so a 1,000 mile radius) please feel free to reply to me or send me the referral directly.

    Because I want my children vaccinated for their safety and the safety of all around us.

    Thanks.

    04.08.09 - 07:24 AM
  • 521. Mari said:

    The problem is that the current generation of parents have not experienced epidemic illness. My parents remember being terrified of polio, of children who never walked again. My grandparents lost siblings and friends to disease outbreaks. It was common. We are lucky to be born when we were, but unfortunately, memory is a great motivator. Maybe they should show films of people dying with those diseases in health classes. It wasn't pretty.

    04.08.09 - 07:25 AM
  • 522. Amy said:

    I've struggled with both sides of this controversy myself. Ultimately, both her other mom and I decided to vaccinate our little one, but we do it on a modified timetable that was recommended by our pediatrician in which all vaccines are administered by the "suggested age," they are just spaced differently and not all given at the same time, which is what some people also link with autism. For our family, this simply meant 2 additional visits to the pediatrician's office before 2 years of age and a vaccination given at one of the well baby exams during which a vaccination otherwise wouldn't have been given.

    04.08.09 - 07:25 AM
  • 523. Marlene said:

    Heather,

    I couldn't agree w/ you more on the topic of vaccinating our children. I honestly don't buy it that vaccinations are causing autisim in our children. I feel more strongly that what is in the food, water and other things we put into our bodies on a daily basis have more effect on our unborn children, and babies.

    I believe that science can be a VERY useful and good "tool" in our society if it's put towards preventing and curing diseases. ( among other things, but that's a different topic ) I understand that in a "free country" parents are allowed to basically do whatever they feel is right for their child, but by doing so, they're not only putting their children at risk for catching potentially deadly illness's, but other children as well. I just don't think it's a gamble worth taking and truly wish more parents would look at the big picture, not the "here & now". Diseases NEED to be controlled & contained, end of story.

    Thank you for all the topics you put forth to help people think and reflect. We do not all agree all the time, but lady, you have got some big balls and somedaqy I hope to meet you, shake your hand, and tell you thank you! Thank you so much for your balls.

    Marlene

    04.08.09 - 07:25 AM
  • 524. Michelle said:

    Heather, I'm glad you went further into your explanation. I have to admit I was really peeved after watching your momversation the other day. Partially because you hate when people tell you how to raise your child and here you were being judgemental. I turned around and wrote a blog about it, in response you your momversation. I hope I explained myself well enough, and I hope you read it.
    http://sneathenfamily.blogspot.com/2009/04/vaccinations.html

    I agree that people who choose not to vaccinate because of the herd mentality are not doing anyone any favors...

    04.08.09 - 07:27 AM
  • 525. Jill said:

    GOOD ON YOU for standing your ground. Both my boys were vaccinated and actually my 16 year old just had another booster shot last week. I don't understand parents that don't vaccinate either. They are just reacting with fear. I love your line that parents that choose not to vaccinate are counting on others to keep their children disease free.

    Just to bring up another contraversy...if you have a boy will you circumsize him? (Maybe you know its a girl, I can't remember) Again, I had both my boys done, felt very guilty about it at the time, but am still glad that I did. Recently studies have shown that "cut" males have a lower chance of contacting STD's and AIDS. Plus I know older boys and men that had to have it done later in life and it's a lot more painful then!!

    Curious to hear your thoughts on the subject.

    04.08.09 - 07:28 AM
  • 526. Val said:

    I'm one of those parents who has to depend on the larger population to vaccinate their kids for whooping cough. My son had a severe reaction (turned gray, unresponsive, limp, etc.) from that vaccine after his first or second shot, and his pediatrician and I agreed that it wasn't worth the risk to give him any more. He is up-to-date on all other vaccines, and I fully agree with you that all kids should at least be attempted to be vaccinated.

    04.08.09 - 07:29 AM
  • 527. Leslie said:

    Heather you are brave for opening up this topic but we need brave people. I discussed this issue with my doctor for Paige who is going to be 9 in May. And again with my son Max who will be 3 in August. I was concerned for both children and asked several different doctors on many occassions as well as doing some internet research. I feel badly for those who experience the side effects from the vaccines (or any medication) and those who have autistic children. My doctors strongly advised against not vaccinating as the risks for side effects are small and based on all the research they have read and their experiences as pediatricians have NOT seen a link to autism. Autism rates have risen sharply say in the last 10ish years but vaccines have been used widely for 20 some years. Parents everywhere generally want to do what is right for their children and to protect them but some risk is involved in everything we do. Protecting children around the world is a responsibility we should take seriously and take that risk for the greater good.
    I havent spent time reading what Jenny McCarthy feels about vaccines but I do know she is a strong believer in restricting food and food additives and this having a strong relationship to his improved autistic behaviors.
    I am sure this is being researched somewhere.

    Take care all.

    04.08.09 - 07:33 AM
  • 528. ma2 one said:

    Well, you only have two left in the holly grail of
    off-topic discussions.

    You have taken a very logical unheated sane approach to this topic. Thanks!

    I'm waiting for:
    Circumcision.
    Abortion.

    ;)

    04.08.09 - 07:34 AM
  • 529. Middle Aged Woman said:

    My fight is for fresh, non-preserved immunizations. Then, I am all for them. Until then? I am a teacher of autistic children. More of them every year.

    04.08.09 - 07:38 AM
  • 530. amy said:

    A lot of folks have mentioned statistics, and I believe that is the heart of the matter. People have no educated grasp of statistics. Let's just assume that there is a link between vaccines and autism, you are more likely to get in a car accident and DIE on the way to the ped's office, then you are to get autism from a vaccine. Does that mean you stop driving? Of course not, we take that risk every single day. You are more likely to get hit by lightening than win the lottery, yet millions play, every day. People have no basic understanding of statistics, yet claim to be making 'educated' decisions. You can provide to me all the scientific articles and studies available on the internet you want, you are still making your decision based on _feelings_ and not science.

    04.08.09 - 07:40 AM
  • 531. becky said:

    I agree w/the statement that it's a "first world luxury" to decide not to vaccinate our children. i do not judge anyone who chooses not to.

    I am having my daughter vaccinated on a modified schedule. Pediatricians office did NOT like it one bit. Gave me a really hard time. But...the last time I checked, we are still a MOSTLY free country, and it was my choice. I stood by it.

    It IS an agressive schedule. Based on a lot of fear. Fear that has come for good reason. My parents lived in fear of Polio, still. So, yeah, I get it. But I can't pump my young vulnerable child who is still developing full of chemicals. I just can't see that. And that is where I still DO believe this is an individual choice. Just LIKE breastfeeding or co-sleeping or whatever.

    The measles case you mention? I am certain that the vaccine hasn't "taken" for obscure cases here and there and led to infections in kids who were vaccinated. I've heard of kids getting sick that way. None of this means that there is widespread measles/whooping cough/polio.

    04.08.09 - 07:43 AM
  • 532. Texchic said:

    I was vaccinated as a child and I vaccinated my children as scheduled, and never gave it a second thought. My mother, a schoolteacher, was exposed to Rubella while pregnant with my younger sister, and despite all her doctor's precautions and a gamma globulin injection, she gave birth to a child with extreme disabilities. My sister has been diagnosed as a Rubella-syndrome child, and has epilepsy, cerebral palsy and hemiplasia, deafness and severe mental retardation as a result. It makes me wonder what her life could have been like if the unvaccinated child at my mother's school had never become infected. Instead, she will likely be institutionalized for the rest of her life.

    04.08.09 - 07:44 AM
  • 533. Amy said:

    Dooce, as a mother and a physician, I couldn't agree with you more. Everyone who chooses not to vaccinate is counting on those of us who do. If one day everyone decided not to vaccinate, we'd go back to the middle ages with people dying in their 20s and huge infant mortality rates. They should be thanking all of us who vaccinate for protecting them.

    04.08.09 - 07:44 AM
  • 534. Erica said:

    As I understand it, the thing that concerns many members of the autism community about vaccinations is the apparent unwillingness of the medical establishment to consider alternatives to the current vaccination procedures. NOBODY wants to see outbreaks of measles, rubella etc. But NOBODY wants to see their children harmed in anyway, and if thousands of parents are concerned that vaccinations may have harmed their children, we should pay attention to those concerns.

    So, I think a lot of the anger at parents who choose not to vaccinate is misplaced. Get angry at the medical establishment for not committing to do the research that could make vaccines safer for ALL of our children. Get angry at the medical establishment for not making tests for vaccine sensitivity a routine part of the vaccination process. We should ALL be working to apply pressure on the medical establishment to do these things precisely because of the wider public health implications. This is in the best interest of all of our children.

    04.08.09 - 07:44 AM
  • 535. Babs said:

    I am an RN and have vaccinated all three of my children. I have family members that have made different choices and that is in fact their right.

    I thought it was interesting what one of your readers had to say about the luxury of living in the developed world and exercising her right to take advantage of this luxury. There are two things I would just like to add to this discussion.

    First is this, the only reason anyone has the right to exercise that luxury is because the vast majority of people in the US do not, and get their children vaccinated. In other words, the only reason a minority few can afford to opt out of vaccines is because the rest of us vaccinate our kids.

    The second thing is this, if you have ever lived in the third world, and I have lived in several developing countries for prolonged periods, you will get your kids vaccinated. Because when you see first hand what it looks like when the minority of people vaccinate their children and see children DIE of completely preventable illnesses, you start to rethink those incredibly small percentages of adverse reactions.

    04.08.09 - 07:47 AM
  • 536. Anonymous said:

    To Erika (#500)-

    I agree. I'm so surprised that you are the FIRST post out of 500 to point this out.

    What I don't understand is the amount of trust people have in the medical world and in hospitals and in "research." Don't get me wrong, hospitals and medicine are a wonderful thing, but that doesn't mean that doing the "right" thing can get lost in the lust for the almighty dollar.

    Where do most people think all of this research that eveyone is talking about in these posts comes from? Universities. So it must be reliable, right? Well not exactly. You see, universities have to have FUNDING for research and being that the funding is coming primarily from private and corporate interest rather than the federal government (not that that makes much difference, the government is throughly tangled with corporate interests, as we all [should] know) not all research is going to be granted funding. Especially research that goes against the interests of the people or corporations handing out the money.

    This makes me suspect. I'm naturally suspect of people in power, of people with money. You have to be. What's truly irresponsible is trusting people without thinking long and hard about what is fueling their conclusions and their agenda.

    Here's an example: I live in the fine city of Chicago. I have a dear friend who works in goverment. He has told me that the crime rate goes up and down depending on who is in office to take the heat. They like the guy, murders become logged at suicides and the "crime rate" goes down. They want the guy out, everything is logged a murder and crime skyrockets. This doesn't hit news because they know that if the credibility of the police department is damaged in the public eye, no one will believe anything they say and they will lose their control. Above all else, this control is to be maintained, and for obvious reasons. Know that this trend of crime is being recorded as truthful statistics and many sociologists are doing "research" based on this faulty information.

    This is one example. This happens everywhere, everyday. This is not "wacky conspiracy theory." This is reality, people. Be weary. Don't take anyone's word for anything, whether they have "reasarch" to back it or not until you are POSITIVE you can trust it.

    I'm not positive I can trust much coming out of medical journals or university research. I, instead, trust myself to think critically and not believe a damn thing at face value, no matter how "credible" the source.

    04.08.09 - 07:48 AM
  • 537. Jen from Oz said:

    I want to say that I completely agree with you. I have several friends who have chosen not to immunize, and it really frustrates me. I agree that there may be risks from the vaccines, but the risks of the diseases they prevent are hundreds of times worse! I know this is controversial, but sometimes I feel that they are taking advantage of those of us who do vaccinate. If everyone else takes the (very) slight risk of vaccination, then their child is protected by "herd immunity" at no risk to them. I feel for the parents of the children exposed to measles at the doctor's office or at school, especially when they are so young that a) they haven't been able to have the full immunization and b) their immune systems are weaker. I know my friends who don't immunize figure if their kids get, say chicken pox, they'll just deal with it. What about the other parents with children exposed who DON'T want to deal with it? I feel it's really selfish on their part to expose everyone else.

    04.08.09 - 07:48 AM
  • 538. Scout798 said:

    I don't have children myself, unless you count a step ... and his mom had to do all the hard work with that one. Many of my friends have kids though and it truly isn't until recently that this has become an issue ...

    I have a friend who is VERY vocal against and because its the only way to have her daughter enrolled in day care, has signed a religious waver.

    I have family members who spent months questioning but ultimately went with a delayed schedule. My brother and his wife (she is Swedish) decided that they didn’t want to risk it, both of them had been vaccinated and were ok ... so, they went on the Swedish/European schedule which is much more delayed.

    I am engaged to a man who, god help his soul, believes in science over everything else. His son has been vaccinated for everything under the sun. His feeling is, you would keep them from harm any other way ... why leave them open to going through these horrible diseases. I mean, if he ever travels in more remote countries ... whoa.

    My own personal experience with this was in high school ... many years ago ... there was one girl who, for religious reasons, was never vaccinated and whose parents signed a religious waver. She came down with the measles ... and the entire boarding school was quarantined for a week. They lined us up in the gym and whoever couldn't prove they had 2 MMRs, they stuck us in the arm and vaccinated us on the spot. Man, parents these days would have FREAKED out about that one. Never mind the fact it was New England Championship weekend and loads of other things ... that poor girl was never truly a part of that school again. She was scorned. I felt awful for her.

    I get it ... I do.

    If you are ever interested ... there was a good episode of Private Practice that addressed this very issue. I know ... its cheesy drama tv ... but this one was moving and addressed all sides of the issue.

    04.08.09 - 07:52 AM
  • 539. wendy@areyoubreathing.com said:

    Vaccinations. I'm so glad we're done with those, in regards to our babies anyways. I chose vaccinations, because while there is risk with vaccinations, it seemed the lesser risk to us. Plus, the more people who get vaccinated the better. If people stop getting vaccinated diseases and deaths would be much worse. We did do a slower vaccination schedule, so it was a little less overwhelming for our kids, and for us.

    On the other side, for those people, whose children have suffered from vaccines, I have no answer for them. And it's a horrible thing. Life is unpredictable and challenging in Earth school, especially with kids.

    04.08.09 - 07:53 AM
  • 540. Sue Schlegelmilch said:

    Heather,

    As a long time reader, (and mostly lurker), of your site, I felt compelled to comment on this topic. I want to commend you on your thought-provoking stand on childhood immunizations.
    I, myself, am in a fairly unique position. As a health-care provider, (I am a Certified Nurse Midwife in Orem, Utah) and a mother to a child with an autism spectrum disorder, I have tirelessly conducted my own research related to this issue. I can say (and I do say-over and over again to patients who have concerns over immunizations with their brand new babies) I wouldn't change what I did with my own kids-if I could. I would immunize them again-even if I believed (and I don't) that those immunizations caused my son's autism.
    I worked as a Registered Nurse for years before I went back to grad school, and one of the worst things I ever saw was an 8 year old girl with Whooping Cough. Her parents had chosen not to vaccinate her. She struggled for oxygen with every single breath with the sheer terror of her struggle showing in her eyes. So, again, yes I would absolutely vaccinate my children.
    On another note, and another controversial topic, I highly recommend the Gardasil vaccine for HPV, the virus that causes most cervical cancer. The current guidelines are to vaccinate all females between the ages of 9-26. A lot of people (especially in Utah Valley) think they (or their children)are not at risk for HPV, because it is mostly sexually transmitted, but if they had ever seen anyone lose a battle to cervical cancer, I would hope they would protect themselves and their children, regardless of their religous beliefs. Sorry for the long post-obviously a topic I feel strongly about!

    04.08.09 - 07:54 AM
  • 541. Leesha said:

    I agree completely. There was never a question of whether or not we would immunize our children, as we both knew that we would. It infuriates me that my sister-in-law doesn't immunize her children (although less because of the controversies or possible side-effects and more because she's too cheap to pay the copay and too damn lazy to even take her kids for check ups, but that's another rant) so that she puts my son (and soon to be second son) in danger.

    I know there is a choice, and the freedom to choose what is best for your child. I wish, however, that if a mother or father makes the choice to not immunize their children, they would be as responsible as some of the people who have commented and keep their children quarantined so that their choice is less likely to negatively impact the lives of others.

    My grandfather was furious at us for vaccinating Elijah because a friend of a friend's child had gotten Autism presumably from a vaccine. My stance is I would rather have my son be autistic and alive, than have him die of a disease that could have been prevented.

    04.08.09 - 07:55 AM
  • 542. Stepford Mommy said:

    Ok, I'm fully aware that nobody is going to read the 538th comment on this topic but I need to get it off my chest anyway. I was afraid to immunize my daughter. While pregnant I interviewed more than one Pediatrician until I found one who would comply with my immunization plan.

    My choice was not to forego the shots all together but rather to delay them by a few months and then to do them one at a time. In other words, rather than the MMR we went in 3 times and got one dose of Measles then a week later a dose of mumps then a week later a dose of rubella.

    The doctor pointed out that this was more needles, more co-pays and more visits but I knew that godforbid any bad reaction was to happen at least I'd know that I'd done all that I could to keep from over taxing her immune system all at once.

    The FDA has tested vaccines and found them safe. I've read the studies. What I have failed to find is a study of the safety of injecting small children with multiple (individually safe) vaccines. Just because each on its own is ok doesn't mean they're safe to give all at the same time.

    There- I said it. And even knowing that nobody is going to read the 538th comment.

    04.08.09 - 07:56 AM
  • 543. Emily said:

    I don't have any kids yet [and not really planning on it for at least a little while :) ] but it is so interesting to hear these perspectives on controversial issues from Heather and from all of the reader's experiences! I have a nephew w/ Autism and so I realize how difficult it can be to care for a little one with autism, but on the other hand my father (who was born in 1930) had polio since the vaccination wasn't even created yet, and didn't have the use of his legs since age 1. Not that either condition is completely devastating as my dad still accomplished many successes and had a great life and my nephew is coming a long way in his therapy and schooling, but still it really makes you wonder which risk is greater to take. What REALLY amazes me also is the push-and-pull between "wow, look how far we have come in medicine" and "have we really come that far at all?"

    Thanks for the interesting read(s)! :)

    04.08.09 - 07:57 AM
  • 544. Amanda said:

    Thank you Heather for this honest email. As one poster stated, I did not feel that you were being judgemental, but rather honest.

    I don't have kids. But I have thought about this question many times... which is worse? vaccinating or not? And I still don't know what I would chose to do. Its been interesting to see I am not the only one out there who finds the topic confusing.

    04.08.09 - 08:00 AM
  • 545. Matty said:

    Heather, et al;

    The following statement struck me.

    "If you've decided that the risks are too great to vaccinate your child then you are counting on the rest of us who are willing to take those risks to decrease the chances that your child will be exposed to these diseases. You are counting on us. Maybe what I don't understand (in reference to my statement in the video) is the act of and willingness to give up that control."

    This basic paradigm, when taken out of the context of vaccinations and applied to any number of issues is a great argument. It gets to the very core of the fact that many people's frame of reference on any problem is often times too narrow. One has to examine the advances and sacrifices of generations before us and realize that if we give these up we will find ourselves facing problems and horrors that we never had to, but they did.

    04.08.09 - 08:01 AM
  • 546. Meagan D said:

    Heather this is the most well written opinion that I have ever read, I am continuously impress with your way with words.

    I am as well allergic to the "P" in the old DTP vaccine and was very scared about giving my children that particular vaccine as well. They have changed it for the reason that there are a lot of us out there that had issues with the "P" part of the shot. That is one thing that I can say is that the drug makers do pay attention to frequent side effects and try to make the immunizations better, it may take decades to make the change but it will happen. I have 2 children both of whom I have vaccinated with no ill effects and if I were given the opportunity to do it again, I would. I have personally witnessed how horrible polio is watching my friend’s mother struggle daily with the entire right side of her body paralyzed. I don’t think that I would be able to live with myself if I had not vaccinated and put my children’s health and livelihood at risk.

    Thank you yet again for being “brave” enough to talk about a subject that is so very controversial.

    04.08.09 - 08:03 AM
  • 547. Anonymous said:

    Absolutely brilliant. As usual.

    04.08.09 - 08:04 AM
  • 548. Lee said:

    I have a 19 month old son who has been vaccinated on a "modified" schedule since birth (he was premature and subsequently has had chronic health issues his entire life). He has had atypical negative reactions to all but two of the vaccines he has received. Having him get the MMR vaccine was a terrifying week for us because part of my job is as a medical researcher and I have read all the horror stories about children whose "light" suddenly went out after this vaccine. Fortunately, he was fine.

    I am also lucky enough to know many families with autistic children who say they knew from well before they had the first vaccine that something about their child wasn't right. Until there is a definitive cause identified, I can understand and sympathize with the fear. But as the parent of a chronically ill child who has almost died more than once...I can console myself with the fact that autism is treatable and isn't fatal...devastating yes, but I would rather have my child with me in whatever capacity he is capable than to bury him because of a disease I could have prevented with a quick shot in the leg. One of those scenarios I can live with.

    04.08.09 - 08:05 AM
  • 549. laura said:

    now that my boys are older i would actually LOVE to vaccinate them, but i can't.

    they are allergic.

    allergic as in anaphylactic shock and both of them nearly DIED FROM THE SHOTS and spent days in the NICU.

    but the fear of tetanus and other diseases scare the shit out of me - but do i risk their lives by getting the shots? or risk their lives from not?

    it's a hard-ass decision.

    04.08.09 - 08:05 AM
  • 550. KJ said:

    So, vaccinations. Yeah, I have something to say about that. First off, I fully understand where you are coming from. And, I realize that people’s perceptions of issues are mostly formed by their past experiences. I think it’s fantastic that you feel the way you do about vaccinations, because that means you have a healthy, bright child who was JUST FINE with her vaccinations. And that is truly a marvel of modern science.

    Where I am coming from is slightly different. There is 15 years between me and the youngest member of my family. My beautiful brother, Graham, who when he was just 2 would sweetly follow a “Please” with a “…and Mommy is beautiful!” After his last MMR shot, the light in his eyes was gone. Now, at age 13, he doesn’t speak at all. He is quite high on the autism spectrum, and for years we have wondered about that vaccination.

    Maybe Graham was predisposed to autism and the vaccination kicked things off. Maybe it was other environmental factors. Maybe it was because my parents were in their late 30s with Grant was conceived. Maybe it is genetic. Maybe…

    The thing is, I am absolutely hesitant about vaccinations. I am getting married this fall, and my fiancé and I cannot wait to have children. I am truly wrestling with the thought of “Do we vaccinate?” If it IS genetic, will our baby be predisposed to autism? Could we prevent it by not vaccinating? I know what studies have said. And maybe vaccinations had NOTHING to do with Graham’s autism. But, shouldn’t my firsthand experience count for something? For at least my own situation? Everybody’s, of course, is different.

    I can see both sides of the coin. Which is why it makes the decision so difficult…

    Thank for providing a place for voicing our opinions, Heather. Conversations about these issues are so important.

    04.08.09 - 08:09 AM
  • 551. Shannon said:

    I have great fear and trepidation every time I see those needles go into my son's little legs. But I know deep down in my heart I am doing the right thing. It's very difficult to quite the thunderous crowd in my mind shouting, "You are potentially making him very sick...look what you're doing to that poor boy...you have no idea what they're injecting into him...you're taking a HUGE risk...What the hell are you doing?" But ya know, I just have to turn to them and say, "Shut the hell up!" I've read the copy of "Mothering" magazine that dedicated its issue to the discussion of vaccinations and I had to toss it aside and forget about it because THAT information felt much more risk taking than going ahead with the shots.

    04.08.09 - 08:12 AM
  • 552. Anonymous (#536) said:

    And to Erica (#534) and Middle Aged Woman (#529):

    EXACTLY!

    We all want the same thing: healthy children! It's unfair for parents who choose to vaccinate to be angry with those who don't and not the MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENT. I'm sorry, but I'm not willing to put chemical preservatives and heavy metals like mercury and aluminum into my baby. I'm just not. This goes against every single grain of common sense in my brain.

    Until non-preserved vaccinations are a possibility, I'm not taking the risk. And it goes beyond vaccines, people. I also don't put chemical FOOD preservatives in my child either. We don't do harmful dyes or chemicals in anything from shampoo, soaps, food, drinks, etc. We also don't drink fluoride. It's harmful in toothpaste which carries the warning, "Do not swallow and contact a poison control center in case of accidental ingestion" but the same amount of fluoride that is in a pea size of toothpaste is in an 8 oz glass of water. And you're supposed to have 8 of those a day.

    There are chemicals everywhere that people eat and drink without even thinking about it and vaccines are not exempt. I don't want to see the reemergance of infectious diseases, but right not it's not something I have to worry about. Right now, I'm worried about my childs health TODAY, not future generations. Call me selfish, call me what you want, but if our government were as concerned as you all are about people opting out of immunization, maybe they would listen to our concerns and change the way they do business. Until clean vaccines are a reality, you can count me out.

    04.08.09 - 08:12 AM
  • 553. Anonymous said:

    When I was five, a family in my neighborhood lost their son after he was vaccinated. Yes, vaccination deaths are very rare but they do happen. And it has always stuck with me how dangerous vaccinations can be, let alone the still unclear connection with autism.

    Look, you vaccinated Leta and she turned out fine. Consider yourself lucky. Just don't stand behind your healthy child and ask other parents to make the same decision you did, Heather. Or question their motives. Don't let your inflated ego keep you from remembering one thing: You don't have all the answers.

    04.08.09 - 08:15 AM
  • 554. Leslie said:

    Sorry if this is a repost, but the NPR show "This American Life" did a story about the CA measles outbreak. I vaccinated both my kids but that story actually made me have the opinion shift that you did.

    Can hear for free at: http://tinyurl.com/axmblw

    (if link doesn't work, the show name was 370: Ruining It For the Rest of Us)

    04.08.09 - 08:18 AM
  • 555. karen said:

    I try to eat organic food, keep my kids healthy in lots of other ways, but when it comes to vaccinations, I wholeheartedly believe you should do it. Most autism theories have been proven not to be linked to vaccinations and while it must be terrifying not to fully know the source of autism, infecting other people (babies, kids, older people - anyone with weakend immune systems) is not ok. It's deadly (whooping cough has come back and newborns die from it) and it's not ok, in my mind, for a parent, to choose to expose other people to serious diseases because of your own personal beliefs.

    04.08.09 - 08:19 AM
  • 556. Lisa said:

    This subject is such a grey area... I wish it could be as cut & dry. Vaccinate or not. As a nurse I try to stay informed. I've looked up studies (which show no direct cause thimersol and increased autism). I know people who's kids have autism. What I get frustrated with is things like when Jenny McCarthy went on Oprah and claimed "my son is my science" when stating that vaccines gave her kid autism. Correlation is not causation and one story is not science.

    I remember when my daughter was little and they offered Oral polio vaccine or injected polio vacine. I, as the mom, had to decide which one to give. I was at a loss. I didn't know what to do (at the time I was not a nurse). I read the info and tried to make the best choice. I gave the shot, even though it would be painful. Now the Oral polio is no longered offered because cases of rare paralysis with it.

    I don't know what exactly causes autism. I think it's probably multifactoral but I wonder what research will find in the future.

    04.08.09 - 08:25 AM
  • 557. Nicole said:

    Coming from a completely emotional standpoint: while I can see both sides of the story I have not vaccinated my third child. My oldest son went through all his vaccinations fine, my daughter had hers as well and showed no adverse reactions to them. She, however, is severly autistic. I don't really believe her vaccines played much of a part to her autism, not entirely anyways. But the thought of my youngest son becoming like my daughter is terrifying. It's enough to make me selfishly think I can deal with measles, just not another autistic child. I think I may start to vaccinate him soon though, as he is entering kindergarten in the fall.

    I do wish everyone could understand that some people who don't vaccinate have very good reasons for it.

    04.08.09 - 08:27 AM
  • 558. Anonymous said:

    Hi Heather,
    I can't imagine that you'll read all of these comments, but wanted to add my opinion as well. I have a strong opinion about vaccines because my son has a problem with his immune system and can not receive live virus vaccines. That means no chickenpox or MMR or he would get sick from the shot itself. Because of his immune system he has trouble fighting infections as it is. He has been hospitalized every year since birth with something, usually pneumonia for 3-5 days at a time. If he was infected with chicken pox or measles he would be sicker than most kids and would be hospitalized, he could even die. So it terrifies me that we will be starting kindergarten next year with children whose mother's choose not to vaccinate them, putting us at risk of serious disease. My son gets tested every six months to see if his t-cells have increased enough for him to receive these vaccines. Unfortunately it looks like he will have to wait a few more years, and until then we are depending on herd immunity to keep him safe. I hate not being in control, but we have no choice.

    04.08.09 - 08:28 AM
  • 559. Sue Ellen said:

    As a mother of a child on the autistic spectrum I agree that we need SAFE vaccinations. My son, who babbled happily and was vocally ahead, quit speaking after his bundled MMR. You can tell me all you like about the vaccine/autism connection being a hoax but I lived it and live it every day; he changed and I have video to back me up. I love my boy dearly but my only regret in life is that one bundled shot. What if he would have been the genius to cure cancer or AIDS but because of that one shot the world is denied his ability to do the research?

    I know what autism looks like - we didn't have so many incidences of children on the spectrum when I was growing up; it's not just having a greater awareness that boosts today's numbers. Listen to the moms that tell you that bundled MMR vaccines are not for everyone in the same way that not everyone can eat peanuts; for some the results can be devastating. I believe in fresh, unbundled vaccines in the same way I believe in eating organically grown produce and antibiotic-free meat. As parents we have to live with our decisions ... and so do our children.

    Vaccines - YES! Bundled - NO!!!

    04.08.09 - 08:30 AM
  • 560. Anonymous said:

    My brother wasn't born when I had mumps, and has therefore never had them, leading to worries that if he gets them now he might become infertile.
    My mother has changed her mind nowadays and says she would vaccinate if she had to go through it again. When I have children they will be getting the standard schedule. When I travelled overseas I made sure I had all the vaccinations needed before I travelled.
    A good reference for information is neurodiversity.com, also some of the bloggers at sciencebasemedicine.org.
    Best wishes for the rest of the book tour and the birth of your second daughter!

    O and btw... I want to share this with the other mothers here that need a little extra cash and you want to earn it online for free:
    Go to www.tinyurl.com/cg4ohp

    04.08.09 - 08:30 AM
  • 561. Bouldermama said:

    I rarely comment here but this is a topic I feel very strongly about. I chose - and will choose with my 2nd - to vaccinate. I am one of those moms who worked with my pediatrician to alter the schedule a bit so there weren't so many shots at once, and it worked for us. But I live in Boulder, CO which is a MECCA for parents who use the "herd" philosophy. My daughter's daycare/preschool has a sign over the door as you walk in that says "Over 65% of the children here have not been vaccinated."

    Heather, I really thank you for putting into words exactly how I feel about this topic. I have actually forwarded this entry to friends I've had this discussion with as a way to explain how I feel when I haven't been able to verbalize it well myself. I appreciate - and try not to judge - the parents who choose the other route. But when it comes to putting my child in danger, I too get extremely frustrated. Thanks Heather, as always, for your insight.

    04.08.09 - 08:31 AM
  • 562. Taryn said:

    I am actually extremely new to your site. I just heard about it when I saw your appearance on Oprah.

    I have a child with autism and I thought it was kind of interesting that the first time I visit your site you have posted something on the immunizations and autism. Being that I do have a child with austim I've heard so many thoughts on whether or not immunizations are the cause.

    I whole heartedly believe that my son was not affected by the shots. He had symptoms from the very beginning. But that doesn't mean that I don't believe that there are some children out there that immunizations could be the cause.

    But I wanted to comment on here because in all of the online forums, chats, etc. I've never saw where someone posted anything about their feelings one way or another on immunizations where people didn't start almost rioting over it!

    I loved your comments and the comments a lot of people have said on here! Especially #90! Well said!

    04.08.09 - 08:33 AM
  • 563. Jillian Beers said:

    I am a new mommyblogger. I am going to throw my two cents in here. Right now I am studying holistic medicine in college. My whole reasoning is an intense pulle to treat myself and my family naturally. However, I do not dispel modern medicine what so ever. My oldest son has Asperger's. I was shocked and amazed at the aggressive vaccination schedule with him. There are several factors that can cause autism. My own theroy mainly has to do with genetics and triggers. With my youngest son, we still vaccinate, but do so on a less agressive schedule. The pediatrician was very helpful and understanding of my fears and concerns. My oldest was very sensitive to the vaccines as he broke out with horrible fevers as well. My youngest is up to date on his vaccines, but did not endure the barage all at once. So, I think that vaccinations are absolutely necessarry for our children to thrive, but I think as parents we need to educate ourselves. Do the homework, talk with your pediatrician. I believe that being informed is very powerful. Also, I am learning every day the little things you can do to help your child if they have autism. Hope is not at all lost if autism affects your child. Forgoing vaccinations entirely is way too dangerous to even fathom right now. I am not going to judge those who do though, because in all honesty I know how scary autism is. We need more discussions like this. I think everyone could learn from each other!

    04.08.09 - 08:34 AM
  • 564. Kim said:

    This "conversation" is terribly one-sided. For the few of you who seem open-minded enough to view the other side and who don't blindly trust the FDA and their practitioners (which is equally or more dangerous than not vaccinating) please check out these websites. www.nvic.org www.thinktwice.com and www.mercola.com There are links to other websites on those as well.

    Its fine to say that the loss of a few children (and its more than a few if truth be told... but it never is) is acceptable for the "greater good" until your child is the one sacrificed. And lets not even bring up the complications that may come up later in life because of the vaccines.

    No one should have the right to tell you to put your child's life at risk because other children might get sick. Especially when the information is so skewed by a multi-billion dollar industry that is only regulated by those who profit from it. Come on people, do some THOROUGH research. Learn about how vaccines are made, who makes them, who tests them, who publishes the "studies" showing they are safe, check out the information on the vaccine injury compensation, the court process, and who is held liable (it is NOT the vaccine industry, tax payers pay any compensation awarded!). As of right now, the vaccine industry is completely liability-free regardless of injury or death. There is NO ACCOUNTABILITY. I am not saying no one should vaccinate, but the system is FATALLY flawed and someone needs to do something about it and it starts with us- parents.

    For those of you who feel that there are some vaccines that are important enough to do, which I completely understand, please check out the form on the NVIC website you can bring to your doctor's office and go over it with them before doing it. The more information you have the better. Most parents that vaccinate just do what they're told because they trust their doctors. Doctors are not infallible. I have two family members who are critically ill from following "doctor's orders."

    04.08.09 - 08:35 AM
  • 565. Anonymous said:

    I want to share this with the other mothers here that need a little extra cash and who want to earn it online for free:
    Go to www.tinyurl.com/cg4ohp and check it out.

    04.08.09 - 08:35 AM
  • 566. Amy said:

    Childhood vaccinations no longer contain thimerosal (its active ingredient is ethylmercury). See the following website regarding the difference between ethylmercury and methylmercury and for an interesting discussion about autism and childhood vaccinations.

    http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4055

    04.08.09 - 08:38 AM
  • 567. taryn in ny said:

    I went ahead an vaccinated my little boy on the regular schedule despite the nervousness I was feeling before and after his birth regarding the vaccinations and the scare of autism etc. I tried several times to open up a conversation with my pediatrician and he downplayed my concerns and made me feel like I was over-reacting. Nonetheless I went ahead with the vaccinations. At his 2 yr well visit we were told that some of the vaccines my son had received may or may not have been compromised and we could sign a waiver to not re-vaccinate OR we could revaccinate not knowing how much of the vaccination actually worked the first time and giving a full dose the second time. That didn't sit well with me so in that case... I chose NOT to revaccinate. Shortly after my son was bit by a dog and needed a tetnus. Tetnus was part of the original vaccines that may or may not have been compromised. I chose to have him only vaccinated with the tetnus and not the 2 way or 3 way vaccine (whatever that was I can't even remember) I just didn't feel good about giving him more doses of something when we weren't sure if the originals worked. The fridge they kept these vaccines in was "too cold" but the temps in the fridge varied so there was a great chance nothing was wrong with any of the vaccines.

    In any case with future children I may spread the schedule out a bit but they WILL BE vaccinated. It just seems like too much in too short a time to me.

    XOXOXO

    04.08.09 - 08:41 AM
  • 568. katehopeeden said:

    I have three daughters, all of whom are vaccinated.
    My youngest daughter has Asperger's, something that we began noticing when she was almost four.
    I didn't then, nor do I now believe this is a result of her vaccination. Children begin showing signs of Autism or Spectrum disorders around the same age that they are usually vaccinated.
    There hasn't been a link proven that I am aware of.

    For me, it's simple. If there are diseases out there that can KILL my kid, I'm going to do my damndest to prevent them from getting them.
    And truthfully if I knew that my daughter's AS had been caused by her vaccinations, I would still be greatful that she didn't die from measels or pollio or any other HORRIBLE disease that could have easily taken her life had she not been vaccinated. She is an amazing kid and because she is vaccinated, I know she can grow into an amazing adult.
    ~K

    04.08.09 - 08:42 AM
  • 569. donanell said:

    I know that studies have shown no corelation between vaccinations and autisim, but I personally would rather risk my son contracting autisim and living a full life than risk him contracting an archaic disease that may kill him. Call me selfish, I want to have my son in my life as long as I can.

    04.08.09 - 08:43 AM
  • 570. Kim Siever said:

    FWIW, my four siblings and I contracted measles, mumps and chicken pox all at the same time. We ranged in age from 7-3. Our house was quarantined. We were infected by vaccinated children (well, except for chicken pox), and we ended up infecting no other children.

    04.08.09 - 08:47 AM
  • 571. Jenna said:

    Wow... To share a little tip to all mothers that are struggling to afford things I recommend you sign up here to start earning cash today for free online by taking surveys, doing offers, and playing games:
    http://tinyurl.com/d9nd2d

    04.08.09 - 08:47 AM
  • 572. Dale said:

    This question was a really had one for me with both of my boys. I wrestled with it up until the day of my first's 2 month appointment, when I had to tell the doctor if we would vaccinate or not. We did. And I am thankful, because not 1 month after my boy had his first shots, my husband and I came down with Influenza type B - very rare, and while we were just sick it's fatal in infants. My boy was fine. Complete freaky fluke.

    With #2 I figured I'd just go the same route, except he ended up in the hospital for a week at 8 weeks old with RSV and has had chronic breathing problems since then.

    With both kids we opted to do the vaccinations but altered the schedule AND did not opt to vaccinate for the smaller ones (roto, chickenpox).

    I'm happy with our decision, which as I said did not come lightly. I have a firm belief that our bodies can handle what comes their way, but there are times when we need additional help. I'm a homebirth mom who may homeschool, grows an organic garden, buys local beef and chicken, bakes our own bread, etc - but we vaccinated. It's a balance - do what feels right for your family.

    04.08.09 - 08:47 AM
  • 573. Ramsey said:

    I live in the Bay Area and last year the East Bay Waldorf School was shut down (by the health department) because of a Whooping Cough out break. A large number of parents had not vaccinated their kids and the illness spread quickly. They were not allowed to reopen the school until vaccines were give, this got a lot of those parents up in arms. You would think after watching their kids suffer they would get a clue and do whats best for the community at large. After all isn't that one of the things Waldorf teaches.

    04.08.09 - 08:48 AM
  • 574. Molly Chase said:

    My son is fully immunized on the schedule recommended by his pediatrician. His sister, who I am currently pregnant with, will be as well. I believe very strongly that as a parent and a citizen I have a responsibility to be an accountable member of my community, and part of that is protecting my children and neighbors against preventable, devistating diseases, in the most effective and promising ways available.

    Frankly, I don't worry about autism any more than I worry about things like a satellite crashing into my house. I chose a pediatrician whose experience, compassion, and education I trust, and her recommendations carry the weight of those things. I don't blindly follow her recommendations, incidentally; I am well-educated on the subject and I'm aware of the perceived links, and I don't think they outweigh the risks of not vaccinating to my children. I can prevent a host of illnesses by vaccinating my children. There are lots of other things I can't prevent, and I won't fool myself into thinking I can. I was never able to find unbiased information telling me that failure to immunize would protect my children against autism or anything else; everything I read along those lines was questionable research at best and at worst, completely biased, doing more harm to the cause than good.

    My son was exposed to whooping cough when he was six months old by a baby whose parents chose not to vaccinate. The baby died, and three other unvaccinated children were extremely ill. In no way is this an "I-Told-You-So" to non-vaccinating parents, but the grandmother of the baby who died, who is a friend of my mother's, says that she has no greater regret in her life than not insisting that her children reconsider the importance of vaccinating (their other children have now been vaccinated.) It was a truly awful, frightening experience that I most devoutly hope no parents ever experience again.

    I agree with you wholeheartedly, Heather.

    04.08.09 - 08:49 AM
  • 575. erica said:

    A delayed vaccination schedule is fine for those that chose it. An important reason to vaccinate at an early age is due to an infants weakened immune system and the fatal effect that these diseases could have on an infant if contracted. It is so important to vaccinate your child if you ever plan on having them in large populations with other peoples children. Varicella (chicken pox) and Measles are not the same as the illnesses we had as children. Due to the mutation of these viruses, because of vaccinations, it is important that your child be vaccinated for their own safety. Don't get me wrong, I raise my children as natural as possible and I work in the healthcare field, but vaccinations is the one thing that I would never consider budging on.

    04.08.09 - 08:49 AM
  • 576. jenna said:

    Wow... To share a little tip to all mothers that are struggling to afford things I recommend you sign up here to start earning cash today for free online by taking surveys, doing offers, and playing games:
    http://tinyurl.com/d9nd2d

    04.08.09 - 08:49 AM
  • 577. Kim Siever said:

    Furthermore, the health of none of us five children had been compromised in anyway. We all have enjoyed average levels of health our entire lives.

    04.08.09 - 08:50 AM
  • 578. Mallory said:

    I understand the need to vaccinate the herd in order to protect the vulnerable. At 20 weeks gestation, I contracted chicken pox that almost killed me. I had had the chicken pox vaccination, and it clearly didn't work.

    I will not, WILL NOT, WILL NOT jeoprodize my individual child's health in order to protect the herd. No one else should either. If none of did, pharmaceutical companies would quickly remove the thimerisol, 2-phenoxyethanol, aluminum, etc... that is so controversial.

    04.08.09 - 08:52 AM
  • 579. Stephanie said:

    I have friends who have not vaccinated their children, and one in particular who believes her son got autism the day he got his first vaccination. But multiple recent studies have repeatedly proven that vaccination is not one of the causes of autism, negating the original (highly controversial) study that set off the hysteria in the first place.

    That said, I know there are risks with vaccination. Of course parents should work on a immunization timetable that they are comfortable with. But in my opinion, the risks from the vaccine are far less than the risks of NOT vaccinating your children! I agree with you completely Heather.

    04.08.09 - 08:53 AM
  • 580. Andrea said:

    We were in San Diego on vacation with my then 3 year old at the time of the MMR outbreak and honestly, I can think of no other time that I've been more thankful for having my child vaccinated.

    And there is no link between vaccines and autism. The guy who did the "study" said himself just a few months ago that there was no evidence linking autism to vaccines.

    Heather, you said this much more eloquently than I ever could and I agree with you 100%.

    04.08.09 - 08:53 AM
  • 581. Ruby Tuesday said:

    A quick reply on #297, Sarah Dandelion's post.

    The Pertussis vaccine (aka Whooping Cough) is one of the least effective vaccine's out there, some statistics say only 50%. This means that many children who are vaccinated still contract the illness. And therefore, there are more cases of children with pertussis, regardless of immune status.

    04.08.09 - 08:53 AM
  • 582. Lynne said:

    Just an FYI... Another outbreak of measles in Pittsburgh. Check out this link... story below... about four cases diagnosed this month.

    http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09094/960646-53.stm

    State confirms fourth measles case at Children's Hospital
    Saturday, April 04, 2009
    By Sadie Gurman, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
    Health officials said yesterday that they are investigating a fourth case of measles at Children's Hospital, where the infection might have occurred.

    A news release from the state Department of Health did not offer any information about the age or whereabouts of the latest infected person.

    The department announced Tuesday that two Westmoreland County preschoolers and their 33-year-old father had been diagnosed with measles.

    The health department said the exposure to measles might have occurred in the Children's Hospital emergency room on March 10, or between 8 p.m. March 21 and 11 a.m. March 22; between 6 p.m. on March 25 and 5 a.m. March 26; or between 5 p.m. on March 28 and 4 a.m. on March 29.

    It might also have happened at the hospital's third-floor Ear Nose and Throat Specialty Clinic on March 23, according to the health department.

    Anyone known to have been in those areas at those times are "being contacted for evaluation as a precaution," the health department said.

    Measles is a highly communicable rash illness caused by a virus transmitted by direct contact with infectious droplets or, less commonly, by airborne spread.

    Symptoms include a runny nose, watery eyes, cough and a high fever.

    The incubation period is seven to 18 days, but a person is contagious for four days prior to the appearance of the rash and remains contagious four days after the rash appears. The rash will usually last four to seven days.

    Sadie Gurman can be reached at sgurman@post-gazette.com or 412-263-1878.
    First published on April 4, 2009 at 12:00 am

    04.08.09 - 08:55 AM
  • 583. Mary said:

    I often wonder if it is not the fault of the Mother in some way for maybe smoking, drinking, excess medication, not taking care of herself etc that leads to autism and many other negative effects children experience. I do believe some children experience side effects from the vaccines but those cases are few and far between.

    If my child were effected by a non vaccinated child, would I have the right to sue the Mother who chose to neglect common sence thereby endangering my child? If, I did not have the right and my child became sick and god forbid developed serious medical conditions because of this particular Mother what would I do? I take being a Mother very seriously and deciding to have a child I promised that I would do everything in my power, move hell and high water to protect my child and if someone chose to put my child in danger then I take that as an act of war.

    04.08.09 - 08:58 AM
  • 584. WJA said:

    Very well said.

    04.08.09 - 08:58 AM
  • 585. Alexandra said:

    Well said. I was one of those mothers who tried to refuse vaccines. I didn't want my baby to be another statistic. My PPD didn't help that either! Luckily for me, I'm married to a soon to be pharmacist and his background in the medical field lead him to convince me of the importance. I didn't always agree, but slowly he got me to come to terms with it. Then when my baby was just over a year old, we moved and my sons new pediatrician was so patient with me. She did extra research on my behalf to find the best way possible to explain things in a way I could understand without feeling pressured. I wish she could be every one's doctor!!

    What ultimate got me, was when she told me a story similar to the one you posted about. And the idea of having the health of my son in someone else's hands is just too horrifying to take a chance like that.

    04.08.09 - 08:59 AM
  • 586. Jack & Jill Put Up A Blog said:

    I 100% agree with you and came to that conclusion having heard the measles story you mentioned when it happened. I still struggle with the idea, but realized it is the right thing to do for your community. Sometimes it is NOT all about you...go figure.

    04.08.09 - 09:01 AM
  • 587. Teva Stone said:

    Thank you! Thank you for saying that so logically. I couldn't agree more and tho I do respect people's opinion to do what they want with their children but they are relying on us to vaccinate in order to keep their children safe. These diseases aren't as a big of a threat because of vaccinations - and we are all here today thanks to them.

    So thank you again!

    04.08.09 - 09:06 AM
  • 588. Anonymous said:

    Wow... To share a little tip to all mothers that are struggling to afford things I recommend you sign up here to start earning cash today for free online by taking surveys, doing offers, and playing games:
    http://tinyurl.com/d9nd2d

    04.08.09 - 09:07 AM
  • 589. Jaclyn Bailey said:

    With well over 200 comments at this point, I doubt that anyone will read my comment, but I feel compelled to make it anyways.

    I have a son with Aspergers Syndrom. I delayed his immunizations, not out of fear of causing Autism, but because we had alot going on in our lives at the time, and I lost track of things like immunizations. He was almost two when I began his immunizations. Up until then he was a happy, social child with no behavioural or social delays. Then I began his immunizations and he started changing. A friend recommended that I look into the symptoms of Aspergers (which her son had) and on more than 90% of the characteristics, it was like someone had written a book about my son and had just omitted his name from the book.

    Do I think the immunizations caused my sons autism? Honestly, I dont know. I was so caught up in the chaos of our lives that it is possible I didnt notice the appearance of the characteristics until our lives slowed down, which just so happened to coincide with the time I started his immunizations.

    I will, however continue to immunize my children. The baby I am expecting later this month will be immunized on schedule. My daughter is catching up on her immunizations (again we moved during her "sheduled times") My autistic son is all caught up and will continue to receive any other immunizations the doctors offer us.

    My reasoning? I got chickenpox as a child. It almost killed me. I have delirious memories of my mom crying while wiping me down with cold water, desperately trying to bring down my 106 degree temperature. She didnt have insurance for us (she was a single mother of 2 at the time, barely able to pay our bills!) and couldnt afford to take me to the hospital. Then just as I started to finally get better and my fever finally dropped below 102 for the first time in a week, my two years younger brother came down with the chickenpox too. I remember her crying into my hair as she brushed it after yet another cool bath. She was scared to death that she was gonna loose one of her babies, her whole world at the time, to a disease that she couldnt afford the vaccine for.

    When I became pregnant with my first child, my mom begged me to immunize. She didnt want me to ever have to go through what she had gone through. She drove me to appointments when I couldnt afford the gas to get to the doctors office.

    The immunizations may have forever altered the brain of one of my children,( I dont know for sure if it was the fault of the immunizations after all...) but I thank GOD that I will (with any luck) never have to suffer the way my mother did, while she held her children praying to God not to take her babies from her. I will take an altered life over an ended life ANY DAY!

    04.08.09 - 09:08 AM
  • 590. Anonymous said:

    To Kim (#564):

    Thank you for this post. It was so eloquently written. Brilliant, really. I appreciate your insight and courage and feel that your post helped make me a better, well-informed parent.(Just thought I would spread some of the nauseating ass-kissing around.)

    Anyway, you hit the nail on the head. It is up to US PARENTS to refuse to walk blindly into the world of immunization just because our doctor says so. Having immunization to a deadly disease it a great thing, but what is this mentality that we are to take chances and risks for some to benefit the rest? Maybe the rest of you are willing to take chances for your children, but I'm not, especially when things can be done differently.

    Nothing will ever change if we just follow the herd and not ask questions. Vaccines CAN BE safer. But it costs more money and the people in charge aren't willing to make that sacrifice and hold the Grand Pubahs of the world accountable. This isn't good enough for me. And it shouldn’t be for you either. If you decide to vaccinate, there is of course a benefit to that choice. However, don't think that because you think vaccines are great and you've made up your mind to vaccinate that your job is done. It's still up to you to make sure your kids are getting the BEST VACCINE POSSIBLE so we can lessen ANY risk that may exist to our kids. If we don't ask questions and stay on top of our game as parents, our only option will be to take what we can get.

    My hat's off to those of you who refuse to lie down and just take it. Thank you for speaking out against the crowd to make positive changes that benefit us all, including those children whose parents choose to vaccinate.

    04.08.09 - 09:08 AM
  • 591. Misty said:

    I wholeheartedly agree with you, but have an even simpler reason. I would rather my child develop autism or deal with a horrible rash, than die from something like measles that I could have prevented.

    We have this discussion a lot as my best friend's son has been diagnosed with autism and she is struggling with the overload of information. I personally do not believe vaccinations are causing autism, if they were we would have seen this decades ago, but it's difficult when you are faced with your own child being diagnosed when there is no science telling you why he has autism.

    Bottom line, my kids are vaccinated, and I encourage all parents to vaccinate.

    04.08.09 - 09:09 AM
  • 592. Erika said:

    Okay, I'm not a parent, so let's get that out there....but I'm a fan of logic and the safety of our children and my future children, so when I read this I was absolutely shocked.

    I wracked my brain, thinking hard about everything I knew about Autism and vaccinations, and could not think of anything that had changed in vaccinations since my generation (which shows far less cases of autism) were being done.

    So, I went researching (my favorite thing to do!)

    For those who really want to think hard about this, PLEASE check out these two links:

    The first is all about the Mercury levels in immunization. Please note that while we have had small amounts of it in MMR and TDP vaccines, it was not until the 90's that autism spiked...why?

    In the 90's, the vaccine for Hep B and a specific flu virus were added to the reccommended schedule for childhood vaccines, TRIPLING the amount of Mercury our children are exposed to through vaccinations. I was offered this vaccine myself in Highschool, but refused.

    Well, my next step was to head over to the CDC and find out exactly what the schedule looks like and when these Hep B shots are administered. Should be Middle or Highschool age, right?

    Unfortunately, it's not. Please check out this PDF of the schedule, which you all may or may not have seen. Hep B is administered at extremely young ages now....I personally do not believe the MMR or TDP shots have anything to do with Autism.

    But if you look at the first link I've provided, you will see a chart comparing the symptoms of mercury poisoning to the symptoms of Autism.

    ....I for one will most definitely be altering this schedule for my own children. I believe MMR and TDP shots are dire for the wellness of our nation...but Hep B is not, and I would prefer to at the very least, avoid giving it to my children when they are under 6 years old.

    Links:

    http://www.nationalautismassociation.org/thimerosal.php

    http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/recs/schedules/downloads/child/2009/09_0-6yr...

    All that aside...this was really well written, and I thank you for putting this information out there and inspiring us to look into it more deeply! I had no idea they had made the schedule so aggressive since I was little!

    04.08.09 - 09:10 AM
  • 593. Kimberly said:

    I wholeheartedly agree with the majority of the commenters here, and especially agree with commenters #418 and #518. I AM a scientist by trade and it aggravates me to no end listening to people spout off and lecture ME about what they rabidly regard as 'science' based on scare tactic heresay. There is a method to the madness people. Vaccinations are SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN to be more effective than not. Fact, not heresay. I will however, say that concerns that parents have are always warranted and you should always speak to a doctor if you have questions and want to become more educated on the matter.

    04.08.09 - 09:12 AM
  • 594. Angus said:

    Our two sons are fully immunized at 5yrs and 2 yrs. Number three due to arrive in about 4wks will be as well.
    I have been tested time and time again, as well as had the vax 4 times in 5 years, and am simply not immune to rubella. This is very scary for me. There was an outbreak when I was expecting our first son and luckily I wan't affected.

    04.08.09 - 09:13 AM
  • 595. Diana said:

    Thank you for your well written and well thought out post. My thoughts have followed the same evolution as yours, and my son (and our next kid-in-waiting) follow the recommended schedule. I really think it is our responsibility to vaccinate to protect those who CAN'T, not those who WON'T.

    04.08.09 - 09:14 AM
  • 596. Kristi said:

    I think that people have become very scared of diseases that are no big deal simply because there are vaccinations for them.

    There is an old Brady Bunch episode where all the kids get the measles. It's played for exactly what it was: a nuisance. The kids ring bells and drive Alice and Carol batty, but it's simply no big deal. They're uncomfortable for a while and then they get over it.

    At the end of the show, Alice and Carol make a big chart on a chalkboard of which kids have had what disease, and they mark off a bunch of diseases (for which we now have vaccines) on a big long list as they chuckle over the hurdle they've overcome. They do not freak out and fear death. They just accept these diseases as a standard part of life.

    I think that most families' experiences with most of these diseases in the pre-vaccine days was probably what many of us experienced with chicken pox in our childhoods: it wasn't fun, but we got through that childhood rite of passage just like so many other parts of life.

    Sometimes people will become very ill and die from common diseases. That is tragic and I can only imagine the pain of being the mother of a child in that situation. But the reality is that most people will overcome illness through their bodies' own natural processes and standard treatments, and they will thereby gain immunity. The fact that the weak are culled from the herd is a cruel but natural process.

    Regarding the research, I think that we need to understand where the research funding comes from. Vaccine manufacturers have deep pockets and their primary motivation is to maximize profit. Parents of children with reactions to vaccines have pennies in comparison. It's disingenuous to think that the research is unbiased. Look at the decades that the tobacco companies were able to stonewall anti-smoking legislation with their "research." Consider how many FDA-approved drugs get pulled from the market when, after several years in real world use, it turns out that they have all sorts of harmful and lethal effects.

    I read everything I could get my hands on when I was considering whether to vaccinate my children. Armed with that information, I could listen to my gut and make the right decision for us.

    04.08.09 - 09:17 AM
  • 597. Amy said:

    My youngest was born at 26 weeks. I did a lot of research and with help from his pediatrician decided to have the MMR given as separate shots instead of one group. Everybody has an opinion and as you have well learned-most have no problem trying to shove it down your throat. I think you opened up a great topic.

    04.08.09 - 09:17 AM
  • 598. karen said:

    I completely support any parent who decides to not vacinate their children - but it is also their reponsibility to notify anyone and everyone with an unvacinated infant that they may come into contact that their child has not gotten their shots.

    This may sound harsh - but how could you live with yourself if your child infected an unprotected infant? How could you possiblly ever expect that parent to forgive you.

    So - by all means, made your choice....just don't make MINE!

    04.08.09 - 09:18 AM
  • 599. Kendra said:

    I was so proud of you for making the statement "I don't understand parents that don't vaccinate their kids". Too bad you had to retract a little. The bottom line is that there's no scientific proof that the vaccines cause autism and not vaccinating does more harm than good. If vaccines cause autism, then how do they explain studies that prove otherwise? How about the study that found un-vaccinated kids in 3rd world countries have the same autism rate as vaccinated kids in the US? I have vaccinated all 3 of my kids with no problems. I'm worried that not vaccinating will backfire on these parents. I'm worried about the kids.

    04.08.09 - 09:20 AM
  • 600. Jen at Baby Contest said:

    Great points and a good explanation of why your opinion is so.

    04.08.09 - 09:21 AM
  • «
  • ‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • ›
  • »

You must have a dooce® Community account to leave a comment.

If you've already registered, login.

If this is your first time posting here, snag a free account.

Heather talks about public tantrums (from kids) on today's Momversation.

  • RIP Louis Mortimer Armstrong: http://bit.ly/1R4tv6
  • Hugs and kisses to you, too! RT: @Monkey_Tree: @dooce he probably committed suicide because he was tired of LISTENING TO YOU WHINE.
  • Our fish just died. And I'm sitting here crying. And it wasn't even my fault!

Text Ads

Put your text ad on dooce.com


Footer Books by Heather B. Armstrong
It Sucked and Then I Cried by Heather B. Armstrong

It Sucked and Then I Cried

Amazon

Barnes & Noble

Other Vendors

Things I Learned About my Dad in Therapy by Heather B. Armstrong

Things I Learned About My Dad in Therapy

Amazon

Barnes & Noble

Elsewhere

  • flickr
  • Twitter
  • Recently

    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009

    © 2001 - 2009 Armstrong Media, LLC. All rights reserved. Powered by Drupal. Hosted by Liquidweb. Footer Feedicon RSS Feed Footer FM badge Advertise on dooce®